Predictors of success and recidivism in a home incarceration program

The Prison Journal

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 326-344

  Stanz, Robert ^a   Tewksbury, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248606387     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885500080003006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ball, R. A., & Lilly, J. R. (1986). Theoretical examination of home incarceration. Federal Probation, 50 (10), 17-24.
2. Baumer, T. L., Maxfield, M. G., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1993). A comparative analysis of three electronically monitored home detention programs. Justice Quarterly, 10 (1), 121-142.
3. Beck, J. L., Klein-Saffran, J., & Wooten, H. B. (1990). Home confinement and the use of electronic monitoring with federal parolees. Federal Probation, 54 (4), 22-33.
4. Blomberg, T. G., Waldo, G. P., & Burcroff, L. C. (1987). Home confinement and electronic surveillance. In B. R. McCarthy (ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance (p. 169). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
5. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 41 (3), 332-346.
6. Byrne, J. M., Lurigio, A. J., Baird, C., Markley, G., Cochran, D., & Buck, G. S. (1989). Effectiveness of the new intensive supervision programs. Research in Corrections, 2 (2), 1-75.
7. Cooprider, K. W., & Kerby, J. (1990). A practical application of electronic monitoring at the pretrial stage. Federal Probation, 54 (1), 28-35.
8. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997a). The cost effectiveness of using house arrest with electronic monitoring for drunk drivers. Federal Probation, 61 (3), 19-22.
9. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997b). Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24 (3/4), 35-51.
10. Durham, A. M. (1994). Crisis and reform: Current issues in American punishment. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. English, K., Chadwick, S. M., & Pullen, S. K. (1994). Colorado's intensive supervision probation: Report of findings. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12. English, K. K., & Mande, M. J. (1991). Empirical support for intervention strategies in community corrections. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 7 (2), 95-106.
13. Erwin, B. S. (1990). Old and new tools for the modern probation officer. Crime & Delinquency, 36 (1), 61-74.
14. Fay, S. J. (1993). The rise and fall of tagging as a criminal justice measure in Britain. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 21 (4), 301-317.
15. Gassaway, T. (1989). Home incarceration is cost-effective. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 2 (3), 1, 4-7.
16. General Accounting Office. (1993). Intensive probation supervision: Crime-control and cost-saving effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17. Helm, B. (1993). Jail policy committee population reports. Louisville, KY: Jefferson County Department of Corrections.
18. Holman, J. E., & Quinn, J. F. (1990). Offender mental health status and electronic monitoring. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 3 (4), 1-6.
19. Holman, J. E, & Quinn, J. F. (1992). Dysphoria and electronically monitored home confinement. Deviant Behavior, 13 (1), 21-32.
20. Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1992). Drug treatment and electronically monitored home confinement: An evaluation of a community-based sentencing option. Crime & Delinquency, 38 (2), 158-170.
21. Kuplinski, J. R. (1990). Electronic offender monitoring in Virginia. Richmond, VA: Department of Criminal Justice Services.
22. Lab, S. P. (1992). Crime prevention: Approaches, practices, and evaluations (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
23. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime & Delinquency, 39 (4), 462-484.
24. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & Smith, R. C. (1992). The Pride, Inc., Program: An evaluation of 5 years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation, 56 (4), 42-47.
25. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., & Wright, J. (1987). Home incarceration with electronic monitoring in Kenton County, Kentucky: An evaluation. In B. R. McCarthy (ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance (pp. 189-203). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
26. Mainprize, S. (1992). Electronic monitoring in corrections: Assessing cost effectiveness and the potential for widening the net of social control. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34 (2), 161-180.
27. Maxfield, M. G., & Baumer, T. L. (1990). Home detention with electronic monitoring: Comparing pretrial and postconviction programs. Crime & Delinquency, 36 (4), 521-536.
28. Maxfield, M. G., & Baumer, T. L. (1992). Pretrial home detention with electronic monitoring. Evaluation Review, 16 (3), 315-332.
29. McCarthy, B. R. (1987). Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
30. Payne, J. (1989). Home incarceration: An alternative to jail overcrowding. Large Jails Network Bulletin, 1 (2), 19.
31. Quinn, J. F., & Holman, J. E. (1991a). The efficacy of electronically monitored home confinement as a case management device. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 7 (2), 128-134.
32. Quinn, J. F., & Holman, J. E. (1991b). Purpose versus practice in the use of electronically monitored home confinement. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 15 (1), 157-171.
33. Renzema, M. (1992). Home confinement programs: Development, implementation, and impact. In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 41-53). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Roy, S. (1995). Juvenile offenders in an electronic home detention program: A study on factors related to failure. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 8 (2), 9-17.
35. Roy, S. (1997). Five years of electronic monitoring of adults and juveniles in Lake County, Indiana: A comparative study on factors related to failure. Journal of Crime and Justice, 20 (1), 141-160.
36. Schmidt, A. K., & Curtis, C. E. (1987). Electronic monitors. In B. R. McCarthy (ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance (pp. 137-152). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
37. Selzer, M. L., & Barton, E. (1977). The drunken driver: A psychosocial study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2, 239-253.
38. Somander, L. (1995). Year of intensive supervision with electronic monitoring: Results for the period August 1994-July 1995. Norrkoeping, Sweden: Sweden National Prison and Probation Administration.
39. Turner, S., Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1992). Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 38 (4), 539-556.
40. Vaughn, J. B. (1987). Planning for change: The use of monitoring as a correctional alternative. In B. R. McCarthy (ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance (pp. 153-168). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
41. Vingilis, E. R. (1983). Drinking drivers and alcoholics: Are they from the same population? In R. G. Smart, F. Glaser, Y. Israel, H. Kalant, R. E. Popham, & W. Schmidte (eds.), Research advances in alcohol and drug problems (Vol. 7, pp. 299-342). New York: Plenum.
42. von Hirsch, A. (1990). The ethics of community-based sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 36 (1), 162-173.
43. Whittington, M. (1986). Adult home detention as an alternative to incarceration. Orange County, CA: Orange County Probation Department.