The revolving prison door for drug-involved offenders: Challenges and opportunities

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 462-485

  Harrison, Lana D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044528495     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128701047003010     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Apsler, R., & Harding, W. M. (1991). Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug abuse treatment: Current status and recommendations for future research. In National Institute on Drug Abuse, Drug Abuse Services research series, No. 1: Background papers on drug abuse financing and services approach. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. Avants, S. K., Margolin, A., Koste, T. R., & Singer, J. L. (1993). Changes concurrent with initiation of abstinence from cocaine abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 10(6), 577-583.
3. Ball, J. C., Rosen, L., Flueck, J. A., & Nurco, D. N. (1981). The criminality of heroin addicts when addicted and when off opiates. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The drug crime connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Ball, J. C., Shaffer, J. W., & Nurco, D. N. (1983). Day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12(1), 119-142.
5. Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. New York: Columbia University, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
6. Blumstein, A., & Beck, A. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Correctional populations in the U.S., 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
8. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Felony criminal case processing, 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
9. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Beck, A. J. (2000). Prisoners in 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Bonczar, T. P. (1997). Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Brown, J. M., & Langan, P. A. (1999). Felony sentences in state courts, 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
12. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Ditton, P. M. (1999). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Harlow, C. W. (1998). Profile of jail inmates, 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Mumola, C. J. (1999). Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Mumola, C. J., & Bonczar, T. P. (1998). Substance abuse and treatment of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16. Bureau of Justice Statistics/Wilson, D. J. (2000). Drug use, testing, and treatment in jails. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17. Caulkins, J. P., & Reuter, P. (1997). Setting goals for drug policy: Harm reduction or use reduction. Addiction, 92, 1143-1150.
18. Cotton, P. (1994). Hindsight and new data converge on drug policy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(13), 992-993.
19. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62(1), 3.
20. Gebelein, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of rehabilitation: Promise and perils of drug courts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21. General Accounting Office. (1997). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Washington, DC: Author.
22. General Accounting Office. (2000). State and federal prisoners: Profiles of inmates characteristics in 1991 and 1997. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Gerstein, D. R., Johnson, R. A., Harwood, H. J., Fountain, D., Suter, N., & Malloy, K. (1994). Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
24. Harrison, L. D. ( 1992). The drug-crime nexus in the USA. Contemporary Drug Problems, 19(2), 203-246.
25. Harrison, L. D., & Martin, S. S. (in press). Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for state prisoners formula grant: Compendium of program implementation and accomplishments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, and the National Institute of Justice.
26. Harwood, H., Fountain, D., & Livermore, G. (1996). The economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse in the United States 1992. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
27. Harwood, H. J., Hubbard, R. L., Collins, J. J., & Rachal, J. V. (1988). The costs of crime and the benefits of drug abuse treatment: A cost-benefit analysis using TOPS data. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (pp. 209-235) (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph No. 86) (DHHS Pub. No. [ADM]89-1578). Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office.
28. Harwood, H. J., Napolitano, D. M., Kristiansen, P., & Collins, J. J. (1984). Economic costs to society of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
29. Holder, H. D. (1987). Alcoholism treatment and potential health care cost saving. Medical Care, 25(1), 52-71.
30. Holder, H. D., & Blose, J. O. (1992). The reduction of health care costs associated with alcoholism treatment: A 14-year longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 293-302.
31. Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., Flynn, P. M., Anderson, J., & Etheridge, R. M. (1997). Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 261-278.
32. Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
33. Inciardi, J. A. (1992). The war on drugs II: The continuing grip of heroin, cocaine, crack, crime, AIDS, and public policy. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
34. Inciardi, J. A., Horowitz, R., & Pottieger, A. E. (1993). Women and crack-cocaine. New York: Macmillan.
35. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(2), 261-278.
36. Inciardi, J. A., & Pottieger, A. E. (1986, Winter). Drug use and crime among two cohorts of women narcotics users: An empirical assessment. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 91-106.
37. Inciardi, J. A., & Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Kids, crack and crime. Journal of Drug Issues, 21(2), 257-270.
38. Inciardi, J. A., & Pottieger, A. E. (1998). Drug use and street crime in Miami: An almost twenty-year retrospective. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1839-1870.
39. Johnson, B. D., Goldstein, P. J., Preble, E., Schmeidler, J., Lipton, D. S., Spunt, B., & Miller, T. (1985). Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin users. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
40. Jones, K. R., & Vischi, T. R. (1979). Impact of alcohol, drug abuse and mental health treatment on medical care utilization: A review of the research literature. Medical Care, 17(Suppl. 12).
41. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for inprison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79, 337-351.
42. Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, and the National Institute of Justice.
43. Lipton, D. S., & Johnson, B. D. (1998). Smack, crack and score: Two decades of NIDA-funded drugs and crime research at NDRI 1974-1994. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1779-1816.
44. Lipton, D. S., Pearson, F. S., & Wexler, H. K. (2000). Final report: National evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for state prisoners program from onset to midpoint (Rep. to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
45. Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A, Saum, C. A., & Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. The Prison Journal, 79, 294-320.
46. Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (1993a). Case management approaches for criminal justice clients. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), Drug treatment and criminal justice (pp. 81-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (1993b). A case management treatment program for drug involved prison releasees. The Prison Journal, 73(3/4), 319-331.
48. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1992). Extent and adequacy of insurance coverage for substance abuse services (Institute of Medicine Rep.: Treating Drug Problems). In Drug Abuse Services research series. No. 2, Vol. 1. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration; National Institute on Drug Abuse.
49. Nurco, D. N. (1998). A long term program of research on drug use and crime. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1817-1838.
50. O'Brien, C. P., & McClelland, T. A. (1996). Myths about the treatment of addiction. Lancet, 347, 237-240.
51. Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse, The Prison Journal, 79, 384-410.
52. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(1), 72-96.
53. Pettiway, L. E. (1987). Participation in crime partnerships by female drug users: The effects of domestic arrangements, drug use, and criminal involvement. Criminology, 251, 741-766.
54. Rice, D. P., Kelman, S., Miller, L. S., & Dunmeyer, S. (1990). The economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness: 1985 (Rep. Submitted to the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy of the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). San Francisco: Institute for Health and Aging.
55. Robinson, L., & Travis, J. (n.d.). Managing prisoner reentry for public safety. Unpublished manuscript.
56. Simpson, D. D., Davage, L. J., Lloyd, M. R., & Sells, S. B. (1978). Evaluation of drug abuse treatments based on first year follow up (NIDA Services Research Monograph Series No. ADM 78-701). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
57. Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration. (2000). Substance abuse treatment in adult and juvenile correctional facilities: Finding from the Uniform Facility Data Set 1997 Survey of Correctional Facilities. Rockville, MD: Author. Available: www.samhsa.gov/csat/csat.htm
58. Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. The Prison Journal, 79, 321-336.