Secondary analysis in social work research education: Past, present, and future promise

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 543-560

  Sales, Esther ^a   Lichtenwalter, Sara ^b   Fevola, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b GANNON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750417908     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2006.200404136     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berger, R. (2002). Teaching research in practice courses. Social Work Education, 21, 347-358.
2. Center for Human Resource Research. (2001). NLSY79 users guide: A guide to the 19792000 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
3. Dale, A., Arber, S., & Proctor, M. (1988). Doing secondary analysis. London, UK: Unwin Hyman.
4. Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. New York: Free Press.
5. Graves, J. R. (1998). Secondary data analysis. In J. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Nursing Research (pp. 523-524). New York: Springer.
6. Green, R. G., Bretzin A., Leininger C., & Stauffer, R. (2001). Research learning attributes of graduate students in social work, psychology, and business. Journal of Social Work Education, 37,333-341.
7. Grinnell, R. M. (2001). Social work research and evaluation (6th ed.). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
8. Hardcastle, D. A., & Bisman, C. D. (2003). Innovations in teaching social work research. Social Work Education, 22(1), 31-43.
9. Hakim, C. (1982). Secondary analysis in social research. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
10. Heaton, J. (1998). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Research Update, 22, University of Surrey. Retrieved March 5, 2003, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/sru22.html
11. Hull, G. H., & Mokuau, N. (1994). Research in baccalaureate social work programs: A model for integration. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 10(1/2), 137-147.
12. Hyman, H. (1972). Secondary analysis of sample data. New York: Wiley.
13. Kiecolt, K. J., & Nathan, L. E. (1985). Secondary analysis of survey data. Newbury Park, CA
14. Knee, R. T. (2002). Can service learning enhance student understanding of social work research? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(1/2), 213-225.
15. Krysik, J. L. (2001). Secondary analysis. In R. M. Grinnell (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (6th ed., pp. 331-346). Itasca. IL: Peacock.
16. Lindsey, D. (1994). Mandated reporting and child abuse fatalities: Requirements for a system to protect children. Social Work Research, 18(1), 41-54.
17. Monette, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R. (2002). Applied Social Research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
18. Moriarty, H. J., Deatrick, J. A., Mahon, M. M., Feetham, S. L., Carroll, R. M., Shepard, M. P., & Orsi, A. J. (1999). Issues to consider when choosing and using large national databases for research of families. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(2), 143-153.
19. National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect (NDACAN). (2004). National survey of child and adolescent well-being special research meeting. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from www.ndacan.cornell.edu/NDACAN/Workshops.html
20. National Institutes of Health. (2003). Final statement on sharing research data (NOT-OD-03-032). Retrieved March 5, 2003, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html
21. National Institutes of Health. (2002). Frequently asked questions on data sharing. Office of Extramural Research. March 1, 2002. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://grants. nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_faqs.htm
22. National Institutes of Health. (1997). NIH Guide: Secondary Analysis of Existing Health Services Data Sets. 26(19), PA number: PA-97-066. Retrieved May 29, 2003, from http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-97-066.html
23. National Longitudinal Survey User Services. (2004). A User Workshop on the National Longitudinal Surveys. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://www.bls.gov/nls/userconfer-ence/y97userconf2004.pdf
24. Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Pollack, C. (1999). Methodological considerations with secondary analyses. Outcome Management for Nursing Research, 3(4), 147-152.
26. Reissman, C. (Ed.). (1994). Qualitative studies in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Rew, L., Koniak-Griffin, D., Lewis, M. A., Miles, M., & O'Sullivan, A. (2000). Secondary data analysis: New perspective for adolescent research. Nursing Outlook, 48, 223-229.
28. Riedel, M. (2000). Research strategies for secondary data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29. Royse, D. (2004). Research methods in social work (4th ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
30. Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., Padgett, D. K., & Logan, T. K. (2001). Program evaluation: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
31. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2005). Research methods for social work (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
32. Scott, D. (2002). Adding meaning to measurement: The value of qualitative methods in practice research. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 923-930.
33. Shepard, M. P., Carroll, R. M., Mahon, M. M., Moriarty, H. J., Feetham, S. L., Deatrick, J. A., & Orsi, A. J. (1999). Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(2), 154-167.
34. Sherman, E., & Reid, W. (Eds.) (1994). Qualitative research in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Sieppert, J. D., McMurtry, S. L., & McClelland, R. W. (2001). Utilizing existing statistics. In R. M. Grinnell (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (6th ed., pp. 347-646). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
36. Stewart, D. W. (1993). Secondary research: Information sources and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). NLSY Geocode data. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsgeo.htm
38. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003). Letter of agreement (Section VII [F]). Washington, DC: Author.
39. U.S. Census Bureau (2003). US Census Bureau 2000 financial report. Retrieved July 19, 2003, from www.census.gov
40. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Public use microdata sample: Technical documentation. Washington, DC: Author.
41. Webb, E., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
42. Weinbach, R. W. (2005). Evaluating social work services and programs. Boston: Pearson.
43. Yegidis, B. L., & Weinbach, R. W. (1996). Research methods for social workers (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Zablotsky, D. (2001). Why do I have to learn this if I'm not going to graduate school? Teaching research methods in a social psychology of aging course. Educational Gerontology, 27, 609-622.