Secondary data analysis: New perspective for adolescent research

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 223-229

  Lynn, Rew ^a   Koniak Griffin, Deborah ^d   Lewis, Mary Ann ^d   Miles, Margaret ^b   O'Sullivan, Ann ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034263598     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mno.2000.104901     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Healthy People 2010 objectives: draft for public comment. Washington: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1998.
2. Search Institute. Starting out right. Minneapolis (MN): Search Institute; 1997.
3. Lobo ML. Secondary analysis as a strategy for nursing research. In: Chinn PL, editor. Nursing research methodology: issues and implementation. Rockville (MD): Aspen Publishers, Inc; 1986. p. 295-304.
4. Kiecolt KJ, Nathan LE. Secondary analysis of survey data. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985.
5. Elder GH, Pavalko EK, Clipp EC. Working with archival data: studying lives. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1993.
6. Youngblut JM, Casper GR. Focus on psychometrics: Single-item indicators in nursing research. Res Nurs Health 1993;16:459-65.
7. Ailinger R, Lasus H, Choi E. Using national data sets on CD-ROM to teach nursing research. Image J Nurs Sch 1997;29:17-20.
8. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 1997;278:823-32.
9. Blum RW, Rinehart PM. Reducing the risk: connections that make a difference in the lives of youth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Printing Services; 1997.
10. Young CH, Savela KL, Phelps E. Inventory of longitudinal studies in the social sciences. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1991.
11. Zill N, Daly M. Researching the family: Survey and statistical data on U.S. families. Washington (DC): Child Trends, Inc; 1993.
12. Szabo V, Strang VR. Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Adv Nurs Sci 1997:20(2):66-74.
13. Rew L. Perceived health status and its relationship to risk and protective factors in homeless youth. In press 2000.
14. Rew L. Friends and pets as companions: strategies for coping with loneliness among homeless adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. Submitted for publication 2000.
15. Wuerker AK. Longitudinal research using computerized clinical databases: caveats and constraints. Nurs Res 1997;46:353-5.
16. Strickland OL. Editorial: measurement concerns when using existing data bases. J Nurs Measure 1997:5:15-7.
17. Moriarity HJ, Deatrick JA, Mahon MM, Feetham SL, Carroll RM, Shepard MP, et al. Issues to consider when choosing and using large national databases for research of families. West J Nurs Res 1999;21:143-53.
18. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research: principles and methods. 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1995.
19. Jacobson AF, Hamilton P, Galloway J. Obtaining and evaluating data sets for secondary analysis in nursing research. West J Nurs Res 1993;15:483-94.
20. Pharris MD, Resnick MD, Blum RW. Protecting against hopelessness and suicidality in sexually abused American Indian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 1997;21:400-6.
21. McArt EW, McDougal LW Secondary data analysis - a new approach to nursing research. Image J Nurs Sch 1985;17:54-7.
22. Kocher KM, Thomas GW Retaining Army nurses: a longitudinal model. Res Nurs Health 1994;17:59-65.
23. Long KA, Weinert C. Descriptions and perceptions of health among rural and urban adults with multiple sclerosis. Res Nurs Health 1992;15:335-42.
24. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1963.
25. Shepard MP, Carroll RM, Mahon MM, Moriarty HJ, Feetham SL, Deatrick JA, et al. Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis: an example from research of families. West J Nurs Res 1999;21:154-67.
26. Stronski S, Neumark-Sztainer D, Ireland M, Ledoux S, Choquet M, Blum R. Self-reported weight status, body size perception and psychosocial concerns among adolescents in France and the US: a cross-cultural population based comparison. J Adolesc Health 1999;24:94.
27. Conn VS, Armer JM. Meta-analysis and public policy: opportunity for nursing impact. Nurs Outlook 1996;44:267-71.
28. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Thorofare (NJ): Charles B. Slack; 1974.
29. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. J Experiment Soc Psychol 1973;27:41-57.
30. Knapp TR. Quantitative nursing research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1998.
31. Julian TW, Knapp TR. The national survey of families and households: a rich data base for nursing research. Res Nurs Health 1995;18:173-7.