Effect of recent genetic improvement on some analytical parameters of tomato fruit quality

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Volumn 37, Issue 15-20, 2006, Pages 2647-2658

  Ruiz, Juan J ^a   Valero, Manuel ^a   García Martínez, Santiago ^a   Serrano, María ^a   Moral, Raúl ^a  

^a MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Analytical parameters; Improvement; Quality; Tomato

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; FRUIT PRODUCTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PHOSPHORUS; POTASSIUM; SODIUM;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33750360921     PISSN: 00103624     EISSN: 15322416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00103620600823109     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Amorós, A., Zapata, P., Pretel, M.T., Botella, M.A., Almansa, M.S., and Serrano, M. (2004) Role of naphthalene acetic acid and phenothiol treatments on increasing fruit size and advancing fruit maturity in loquat. Scientia Horticulturae, 101: 387-398.
2. Bernacchi, D., Beck-Bunn, T., Eshed, Y., Lopez, J., Petiard, V., Uhlig, J., Zamir, D., and Tanksley, S.D. (1998) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato, I: Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from L. hirsutum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97: 381-397.
3. Causse, M., Buret, M., Robini, K., and Verschave, P. (2003) Inheritance of nutritional and sensory quality traits in fresh market tomato and relation to consumer preferences. Journal of Food Science, 68: 2342-2350.
4. Frary, A., Doganlar, S., Frampton, A., Fulton, T., Uhlig, J., Yates, H., and Tanksley, S.D. (2003) Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for improved fruit characteristics from Lycopersicon chmielewskii chromosome 1. Genome, 46: 235-243.
5. Fulton, T.M., Bucheli, P., Voirol, E., Lopez, J., Petiard, V., and Tanksley, S.D. (2002) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavor, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica, 127: 163-177.
6. Grandillo, S., Zamir, D., and Tanksley, S.D. (1999) Genetic improvement of processing tomatoes: A 20-year perspective. Euphytica, 110: 85-97.
7. Kalra, Y.P., Maynard, D.G., and Radford, F.G. (1998) Microwave digestion of tree foliage for multi-element analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19: 981-985.
8. Lecomte, L., Duffé, P., Buret, M., Servin, B., Hospital, F., and Causse, M. (2004) Marker-assisted introgression of five QTLs controlling fruit quality traits into three tomato lines revealed interactions between QTLs and genetic backgrounds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109: 658-668.
9. Levin, I., Gilboa, N., Yeselson, E., Shen, S., and Schaffer, A.A. (2000) Fgr, a major locus that modulates the fructose to glucose ratio in mature tomato fruits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100: 256-262.
10. Monforte, A.J., Friedman, E., Zamir, D., and Tanksley, S.D. (2001) Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 102: 572-590.
11. Ruiz, J.J., Alonso, A., García-Martínez, S., Valero, M., Blasco, P., and Ruiz-Bevia, F. (2005) Quantitative analysis of flavour volatiles detects differences among closely related traditional cultivars of tomato. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85: 54-60.
12. Scott, J.W. (1998) University of Florida tomato breeding accomplishments and future directions. Proceedings Soil and Crop Sciences Society of Florida, 58: 16-18.
13. Seah, S., Yaghoobi, J., Rossi, M., Gleason, C.A., and Williamson, V.M. (2004) The nematode-resistance gene, Mi-1, is associated with an inverted chromosomal segment in susceptible compared to resistant tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 108: 1635-1642.
14. Serrano, M., Guillén, F., Martínez-Romero, D., Castillo, S., and Valero, D. (2005) Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 2741-2745.
15. Tandon, K.S., Baldwin, E.A., Scott, J.W., and Shewfelt, R.L. (2003) Linking sensory descriptors to volatile and nonvolatile components of fresh tomato flavor. Journal of Food Science, 68: 2366-2371.
16. a gene for resistance to the tobacco mosaic virus. Euphytica, 99: 77-83.
17. Yates, H.E., Frary, A., Doganlar, S., Frampton, A., Eannetta, N.T., Uhlig, J., and Tanksley, S.D. (2004) Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species. Euphytica, 135: 283-296.