The influence of perceptual speed regulation on speed perception, choice, and control: Tunnel wall characteristics and influences

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 69-78

  Manser, M P ^a   Hancock, P A ^b  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Speed maintenance; Speed perception; Speed regulation; Tunnel; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SPEED; SPEED CONTROL; TEXTURES;

SPEED MAINTENANCE; SPEED PERCEPTION; TUNNEL WALLS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

VEHICULAR TUNNELS;

ACCELERATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AIR AND AIR RELATED PHENOMENA; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SAFETY; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; VISION;

ACCELERATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFINED SPACES; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SAFETY; TRANSPORTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750349712     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Argent K.R. Transverse pavement markings for speed control and accident reduction. Transport. Res. Rec. 773 (1980) 11-14
2. Carmody, J., 1996. Design issues related to road tunnels. Research Report CTS TA 805.C37 1996. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
3. Cavallo V., and Laurent M. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception 17 (1988) 623-632
4. Chapanis A. Some generalizations about generalization. Hum. Factors 30 3 (1988) 253-267
5. Cohen J., and Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ pp. 45-46
6. Denton G.G. A subjective scale of speed when driving a motor vehicle. Ergonomics 9 (1966) 203-210
7. Denton G.G. The influence of adaptation on subjective velocity for an observer in simulated rectilinear motion. Ergonomics 19 (1976) 409-430
8. Denton G.G. The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Perception 9 (1980) 393-402
9. Drakopoulos A., and Vergou G. Evaluation of the Converging Chevron Pavement Marking Pattern at One Wisconsin Location (2003), American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC
10. Fambro D.B., Koppa R.J., Picha D.L., and Fitzpatrick K. Driver perception-brake response in stopping sight distance situations. Transport. Res. Rec. 1628 (1998) 1-7
11. Fitzpatrick, K., Brewer, M.A., Parnham, A.H., 2002. Left-turn and rumble strip treatments for rural intersections. Project Summary Report 0-4278-S. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System.
12. Fitzpatrick K., Lienau T.K., and Fambro D.B. Driver eye and vehicle heights for use in geometric design. Transport. Res. Rec. 1612 (1998) 1-9
13. Griffin L.I., and Reinhardt R.N. A Review of Two Innovative Pavement Patterns that have been Developed to Reduce Traffic Speeds and Crashes (1996), American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC
14. Haddon W. On the escape of tigers. An ecologic note. Technol. Rev. 72 (1970) 44-47
15. Hancock P.A. The tale of a two-faced tiger. Ergon. Des. 13 3 (2005) 23-29
16. Hancock P.A., and Manser M.P. Time-to-contact: more than tau alone. Ecol. Psychol. 9 4 (1997) 265-297
17. Keppel G. Design and Analysis. A Researcher's Handbook (1991), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey pp. 351-352
18. Krammes, R.A., Fitzpatrick, K., Blaschke, J.D., Fambro, D.B., 1996. Speed: understanding design, operating, and posted speed. Research Report 1465-1. Project No. 1465. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
19. Landy F.J. Psychology of Work Behavior. 4th ed. (1989), Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA
20. Manser M.P., and Hancock P.A. The influence of approach angle on estimates of time-to-contact. Ecol. Psychol. 8 1 (1996) 71-99
21. Manser M.P., Hancock P.A., Kinney C., and Diaz J. Understanding of driver behavior through the application of advanced technological systems. Transport. Res. Rec. 1573 (1997) 57-62
22. Maroney S., and Dewar R. Alternatives to enforcement in modifying the speeding behavior of drivers. Transport. Res. Rec. 1111 (1987) 121-126
23. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, 2003. Traffic Safety Facts 2003: Speeding. Department of Transportation Publication No. DOT HS 809 771. Washington, DC.
24. Osaka N. Speed estimation through restricted visual field during driving in day and night: naso-temporal hemifield differences. In: Gale A.G., Smith P.J., Haslegrave C.M., Taylor S.P., and Freeman M.H. (Eds). Vision in Vehicles II (1988), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam 351-352
25. Retting R.A., Persaud B.N., Gardner P.E., and Lord D. Crash and injury reduction following installation of roundabouts in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 91 (2001) 628-631
26. Rose, E.R., Ullman, G.L., 2003. Evaluation of dynamic speed display signs (DSDS). Research Report FHWA/TX-04/0-4475-1. Federal Highways Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.
27. Schiff W., and Arnone W. Perceiving and driving: where parallel roads meet. In: Hancock P.A., Flach J., Caird J., and Vicente K. (Eds). Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems vol. 2 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1-35
28. Schmidt R.A., and Lee T.D. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 4th ed. (2005), Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
29. Sivak M. The information that drivers use: is it indeed 90% visual?. Perception 25 9 (1996) 1081-1089
30. Törnros J. Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel-a validation study. Acc. Anal. Prev. 30 4 (1998) 497-503
31. Zaidel D., Hakkert A.S., and Barkan R. Rumble strips and paint strips at a rural intersection. Transport. Res. Rec. 1069 (1986) 7-13