Compatibility effects in stopping and response initiation in a continuous tracking task

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2148-2161

  Morein Zamir, Sharon ^a   Nagelkerke, Paul ^a   Chua, Romeo ^a   Franks, Ian ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33750317079     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500416375     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alluisi, E. A., & Warm, J. S. (1990). Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 3-30). North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
2. Bedard, A., Nichols, S., Barbosa, J. A., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (2002). The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 93-111.
3. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2004). A Simon-effect with stationary moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 39-55.
4. Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Kerzel, D. (2005). Is direction position? Position- and direction-based correspondence effects in tasks with moving stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 467-506.
5. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124-143.
6. Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. (1962). Donder's B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 575-578.
7. Cavina-Pratesi, C., Bricolo, E., Prior, M., & Marzi, C. A. (2001). Redundancy gain in the stop-signal paradigm: Implications for the locus of coactivation in simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 932-941.
8. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
9. Ehrenstein, W. H. (1994). The Simon effect and visual motion. Psychological Research, 56, 163-169.
10. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
11. Eriksen, B., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters in the identification of target letters in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
12. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
13. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
14. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
15. Greenwald, A. G. (1970a). A double stimulation test of ideomotor theory with implications for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 392-398.
16. Greenwald, A. G. (1970b). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
17. Greenwald, A. G. (1972). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
18. Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342.
19. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
20. Henry, F. M., & Harrison, J. S. (1961). Refractoriness of a fast movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 13, 351-354.
21. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
22. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
23. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral Brain Science, 24, 849-878.
24. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
25. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
26. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253-270.
27. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
28. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
29. Ladefoged, P., Silverstein, R., & Papcun, G. (1973). Interruptibility of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1105-1108.
30. Lappin, J. S., & Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 805-811.
31. Logan, G. D. (1981). Attention, automaticity, and the ability to stop a speeded choice response. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Logan, G. D. (1982). On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 778-792.
33. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 214-249). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
35. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
36. Logan, G. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 107-112.
37. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203.
38. Marzi, C. A., Bisiacchi, P., & Nicoletti, R. (1991). Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1163-1177.
39. Michaels, C. F., & Stins, J. F. (1997). An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 333-360). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
40. Morein-Zamir, S., & Meiran, N. (2003). Individual stopping times and cognitive control: Converging evidence from a new stop signal paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 469-490.
41. Morein-Zamir, S., Nagelkerke, P., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., & Kingstone, A. F. (2004). Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1030-1040.
42. Morein-Zamir, S., Nagelkerke, P., Chua, R., Franks, I. M., & Kingstone, A. F. (in press). Measuring online volitional response control with a continuous tracking task. Behavioral Research Methods.
43. Nigg, J. T. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571-598.
44. Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 411-425.
45. Prinz, W. (1997). Why Donders has led us astray. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 247-268). North-Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
46. Proctor, R., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
47. Proctor, R., Reeve, T. G., & van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 727-741). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48. Proctor, R., & van Zandt, T. (1994). Human factors in simple and complex systems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
49. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Band, G. P. H., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptive behavior: Effects of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 315-337.
50. Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Simon, R. J. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
52. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. In W. C. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (Vol. 30, pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
53. Sturmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1746-1759.
54. van den Wildenberg, W., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 253-266.
55. van den Wildenberg, W., van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2002). Reduced response readiness delays stop signal inhibition. Acta Psychologia, III, 155-169.
56. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
57. Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 205-213.
58. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Effect anticipation in action planning. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention & performance XIX (pp. 645-672). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.