The uses of the classroom observation schedule to improve classroom instruction

Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms: New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 72-96

  Waxman, Hersh C ^a   Padrón, Yolanda N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750314746     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616419.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Anderson, L. W. (1987). The classroom environment study: Teaching for learning. Comparative Education Review, 31(1), 69–87.
2. Brophy, J. E. (1979). Using observation to improve your teaching (Occasional Paper No. 21). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
3. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
4. Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5, pp. 163–198). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
5. Doyle, W. (1979). Making managerial decisions in classrooms. In D. L. Duke (Ed.), Classroom management (pp. 42–74). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
6. Evertson, C., & Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 162–207). New York: Macmillan.
7. Fraser, B. J., Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Assessment of learning environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI) (3rd ed.). Perth: Western Australian Institute of Technology.
8. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2000). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Longman.
9. Johnson, D. W. (1974). Affective outcomes. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance (pp. 99–112). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
10. Nuthall, G., & Alton-Lee, A.(1990). Research on teaching and learning: Thirty years of change. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 546–570.
11. Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1999). Classroom observations of the Five Standards of Effective Teaching in urban classrooms with English language learners. Teaching and Change, 7(1), 79–100.
12. Padrón, Y. N., Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1999). Classroom and instructional learning environment differences between resilient and non-resilient elementary school students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk ofFailure, 4(1), 63–81.
13. Schunk, D. H. (1992). Theory and research on student perceptions in the classroom. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 3–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Stallings, J. A., & Mohlman, G. G. (1988). Classroom observation techniques. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: Aninternational handbook(pp. 469–474). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15. Stallings, J. A., Needles, M. C., & Sparks. (1987). Observation for the improvement of student learning. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks toteachers(pp. 129–158). New York: Random House.
16. Tharp, R. G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice (Research Report No. 1). Santa Cruz: Center for Researchon Education, Diversity & Excellence, University of California.
17. Walberg, H. J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 214–229). New York: Macmillan.
18. Waxman, H. C. (1995). Classroom observations of effective teaching. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice (pp. 76–93). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of EducationalComputing Research, 14, 147–159.
20. Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1997). Classroom instruction and learning environment differences between effective and ineffective urban elementary schools for African American students. Urban Education, 32, 7–44.
21. Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1999). Classroom observation research and the improvement of teaching. In H. C.Waxman & H. J.Walberg (Eds.), New directionsfor teaching practice and research(pp. 107–129). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
22. Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. L., Anderson, L.W., & Weinstein, T. (1997). Classroom process differences in inner-city elementary schools. Journal of EducationalResearch, 91, 49–59.
23. Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. L., & Padrón, Y. N. (1995). Investigating the pedagogy of poverty in inner-city middle level schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(2), 1–22.
24. Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Lindvall, C. M., & Anderson, K. A. (1990a). Classroom Observation Schedule technical manual (rev. ed.). Philadelphia: Center for Research in Human Development and Education, Temple University.
25. Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Lindvall, C. M., & Anderson, K. A. (1990b). Teacher Roles Observational Schedule technical manual (rev. ed.). Philadelphia: TempleUniversity, Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
26. Weinstein, R. S. (1989). Perceptions of classroom processes and student motivation: Children’s views of self-fulfilling prophecies. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 187–221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Winne, P. H. (1985). Steps toward promoting cognitive achievements. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 673–693.