Multi-objective optimisation of the protein-ligand docking problem in drug discovery

GECCO 2006 - Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1793-1800

  Oduguwa, A ^a   Tiwari, A ^a   Fiorentino, S ^a   Roy, R ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug Discovery; Evolutionary Computing; Multi objective Optimisation; Protein Ligand Docking

Indexed keywords

DRUG PRODUCTS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION;

DRUG DISCOVERY; MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION; PROTEIN LIGAND DOCKING;

PROTEINS;

EID: 33750266274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1143997.1144287     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Clark, D. E. Evolutionary Algorithms in Molecular Design. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. Wiley, GmbH, 2000.
2. Deb, K. Multi-objective Optimisation Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Willey & sons, Chichester, UK, 2001.
3. Del Carpio, C. A., and Yoshimori, A. MIAX: A system for assessment of macromolecular interaction. Genome Informatics, 11 (2000), 205 - 214.
4. Eisenstein, M., and Katchalski-Katzir, E. On proteins, grids, correlations and docking. C.R. Biologies, 327 (2004), 409-420.
5. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optmization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1989.
6. Hillisch, A. and Hilgenfield, R. Modern Methods of Drug Discovery, Springer Verlag, Germany, 2003.
7. Jackson, R. M., and Sternberg, J. E. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. Journal of molecular Biology, 250(1995), 258-275.
8. Jones, G., Willet, P., et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. Journal of Molecular Biology, 267 (1997), 727-748.
9. Kitchen, D. B., Decernez, H., et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and application. Nature Review Drug Discovery, 3 (2004), 935-948.
10. Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: An overview. Drug Discovery Today, 7, 20 (2002), 1047-1055.
11. Maggio, E. T., and Ramnarayan, K. Recent developments in computational proteomics. Drug Discovery Today, 6, 19 (2001), 996-1004.
12. Needleman, S. B., and Wunsch, C. D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 42 (1970), 245-261.
13. Oduguwa, A., Tiwari, A. and Roy, R. An overview of soft computing techniques in drug discovery. In 9th online world conference on soft computing in industrial applications, Online, 2004.
14. Tiwari, A., Roy, R., Jared, G. and Munaux, O. Evolutionary-based techniques for real-life optimisation: Development and testing. Applied Soft Computing (ASC) Journal, 1, 4F (2002), 301-329.
15. Oshiro, C. M., Kuntz, I. D., et al. Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 9, 1 (1995), 113-130.
16. Oyama, T., Kitano, K., et al. Mining association rules related to protein-protein interactions. Genome Informatics (2000), 358-359.
17. Pegg, S. C. H., Haresco, J. J., et al. A genetic algorithm for structure-based de novo design. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 15 (2001), 911-933.
18. Schleyer, P. V. R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. John Wiley, 1998.
19. Schneider, G., Clement-Chomienne, O., et al. Virtual screening for bioactive molecules by evolutionary de novo design. Angewandte Chemie, 39 (2000), International Edition in English, 4130-4133.
20. Taylor, J. S. and Burnett, R. M. DARWIN: A program for docking flexible molecules. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 41 (2000), 173-191.
21. Verkman, A. S. Drug discovery in academia. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology, 286 (2004), C465-C474.