Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand

Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 742-746

  Bangtrakulnonth, Aroon ^a   Pornrungwong, Srirat ^a   Pulsrikarn, Chaiwat ^a   Boonmar, Sumalee ^b   Yamaguchi, Keiji ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c HOKKAIDO INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750202847     PISSN: 01251562     EISSN: 26975718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Aspinall ST, Hindle MA, Hutchinson DN. Improved isolation of Salmonella from faeces using a semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11: 936-9.
2. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45: 493-6.
3. Boonmar S, Bangtrakulnonth A, Marnrim N, Kusum M, Suksitviwattana A. The isolation of Salmonella in fresh meat by standard conventional method and MSRVmethod. Proceedings of the 22 ndTVMA, 20-22 November 1995: 218-30.
4. Boonmar S, Bangtrakulnonth A, Marnrim N, Amatayakul C. Isolation of Salmonella in meat product by Standard Conventional Method (SCM) and Modified Semisolid Rappaport Vassiliadis method (MSRV). Food (Thai) 1997; 2: 88-97.
5. Boonmar S, Bangtrakulnonth A, Pornruangwong S, Samosornsuk S, Kaneko K, Ogawa M. Significant increase in antibiotic resistance of Salmonella isolates from human beings and chicken meat in Thailand. Vet Microbiol 1998; 62: 73-80.
6. Boonmar S, Bangtrakulnonth A, Khositanon W, Pornruangwong S, Watanatraibhob P, Suphasindhu V. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonella isolates from beef, pork, chicken and rats in Thailand. Kasetsart Vet 2000; 10: 6-13.
7. Braun C, Kostka V, Balks E, Redmann T, Helmuth R. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers. J Vet Med Ses b 1998; 45: 245-50.
8. De Medici D, Pezzotti G, Marfoglia C, Caciolo D, Foschi G, Orefice L. Comparison between ICS-Vidas. MSRV and standard cultural method for Salmonella recovery in poultry meat. J Food Prot 1998; 45: 205-10.
9. National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth informational supplement. 2002.
10. Read SC, Irwin RJ, Poppe C, Harris J. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples. Poult Sci 1994; 73: 1617-21.
11. Voogt N, Raes M, Wannet WJB, Henken AM, Van De Giessen AW. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001; 32: 89-92.
12. White D, Shaohua Z, Sudler R, et al. The isolation of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella from retail ground meats. N Engl JMed 2001; 345: 1147-54.
13. Willinga D, Bermudez N, Hopkins E. Poultry on antibiotics: hazards to human health. [Cited 2005 Nov 7]. Available from: URL: www. siearraclub.org/ antibiotic.2002