Eye-rollers, risk-takers, and turn sharks: Target students in a professional science education program

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 819-851

  Martin, Sonya N ^a   Milne, Catherine ^b   Scantlebury, Kathryn ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM INTERACTIONS; KINDERGARTEN SCHOOLS; MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION (MSCE); TEACHING STRUCTURES;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 33750178522     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20154     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Barton, A.C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Clewell, B., Hannaway, J., Cosentino de Cohen, C., Merryman, A., Mitchell, A., & O'Brian, J. (1995). Systemic reform in mathematics and science education: An urban perspective. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
7. Cline, D.A. (1986). Target students in the science classroom: A case study. East Lansing, MI: East Lansing Institute for Research on Teaching.
8. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: the social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29-62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Felder, R.M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 286-290.
11. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Jones, M.G. (1990). Action zone theory, target students and science classroom interactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 651-660.
13. Kahle, J.B. (in press). Systemic reform: Research, vision and politics. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Kemper, T., & Collins, R. (1990). Dimensions of microinteractions. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 32-68.
15. Kincheloe, J.L., & McLaren, P.L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Ladner, M., & Hammons, C. (2001). Special but unequal: Race and special education. In C. Finn, A. Rotherham, & C. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 85-110). Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation and Progressive Policy Institute.
17. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
18. LaVan, S.-K., & Beers, J. (2005). The role of cogenerative dialogue in learning to teach and transforming learning environments. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: new roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 149-166). New York: Peter Lang.
19. Martin, S. (2005). The cultural and social dimensions to successful teaching and learning in an urban science classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
20. Martin, S. (in press). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom: Using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
21. Martin, S., Roberts, B., & Emig, B. (2005, January). Co-generating solutions with cogenerative dialogues in a Master of Chemistry Education program for high school science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Colorado Springs, CO.
22. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
23. Rich, A.C. (1979). On lies, secrets, and silence: Selected prose, 1966-1978. London: Norton.
24. Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2004, February). Cogenerative dialoguing and metaloguing: Reflexivity of processes and genres. Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [on-line journal], 5. Retrieved March 23, 2005 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/ fqs-eng.htm.
25. Sadker, D., & Sadker, M. (1985). Is the o.k. classroom o.k.? Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 358-361.
26. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Scribner's.
27. Scantlebury, K. (2005). Gender issues in coteaching. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 233-248). New York: Peter Lang.
28. Sewell, W.H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
29. Sewell, W.H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V.E. Bonell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 35-61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30. Seymour, E. (1992). "The problem iceberg" in science, mathematics, and engineering education: student explanations for high attrition rates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 230-238.
31. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
32. Swartz, E. (2003). Teaching white preservice teachers: Pedagogy for change. Urban Education, 38, 255-278.
33. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
34. Tannen, D. (1991). You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
35. Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and the subject in higher education. London: Open University Press.
36. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb. They're different. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
37. Tobin, K. (1988). Target student involvement in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 317-330.
38. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 21-44). New York: Peter Lang.
39. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J.J. (1987). The role of target students in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 61-75.
40. Villegas, A., & Clewell, B. (1998). Increasing the number of teachers of color for urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 31, 42-46.
41. Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 821-842.