A probabilistic account of logical metonymy

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 261-315

  Lapata, Maria ^a   Lascarides, Alex ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX THEORY; LARGE CORPORA; LOGICAL FORMS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; SYSTEMATIC VARIATION;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 0037735758     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089120103322145324     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abney, Steve. 1996. Partial parsing via finite-state cascades. In John Carroll, editor, Workshop on Robust Parsing, Prague. European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, pages 8-15.
2. Apresjan, J. D. 1973. Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 142:5-32.
3. Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson, and Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1):32-68.
4. Barzilay, Regina and Kathy McKeown. 2001. Extracting paraphrases from a parallel corpus. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, France, pages 50-57.
5. Bouaud, Jacques, Bruno Bachimont, and Pierre Zweigenbaum. 1996. Processing metonymy: A domain-model heuristic graph traversal approach. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pages 137-142.
6. Briscoe, Ted, Ann Copestake, and Bran Boguraev. 1990. Enjoy the paper: Lexical semantics via lexicology. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Helsinki, Finland, pages 42-47.
7. Burnage, Gavin. 1990. Celex-A guide for users. Technical report, Centre for Lexical Information, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
8. Burnard, Lou. 1995. The Users Reference Guide for the British National Corpus. British National Corpus Consortium, Oxford University Computing Service, Oxford, U.K.
9. Clark, Stephen and David Weir. 2001. Class-based probability estimation using a semantic hierarchy. In Proceedings of the Second Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
10. Collins, Michael and James Brooks. 1995. Prepositional phrase attachment through a backed-off model. In David Yarowsky and Kenneth W. Church, editors, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pages 27-38.
11. Copestake, A. 2001. The semi-generative lexicon: Limits on lexical productivity. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, Geneva.
12. Copestake, A. and E. J. Briscoe. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics, 12(1):15-67.
13. Copestake, A. and A. Lascarides. 1997. Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: The lexicon pragmatics interface. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the Eighth Meeting of the European Chapter for the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, pages 136-143.
14. Corley, Martin and Christoph Scheepers. 2002. Syntactic priming in English: Evidence from response latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(1):126-131.
15. Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
16. Daelemans, Walter, Antal van den Bosch, and Jakub Zavrel. 1999. Forgetting exceptions is harmful in language learning. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):11-43.
17. Fass, Dan. 1991. met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics, 17(1):49-90.
18. Godard, Danièle and Jacques Jayez. 1993. Towards a proper treatment of coercion phenomena. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio, pages 168-177.
19. Hobbs, Jerry R., Martin Stickel, Douglas Appelt, and Paul Martin. 1993. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2):69-142.
20. Inverson, Eric and Stephen Helmreich. 1992. An integrated approach to non-literal phrase interpretation. Computational Intelligence, 8(3):477-493.
21. Keller, Frank and Theodora Alexopoulou. 2001. Phonology competes with syntax: Experimental evidence for the interaction of word order and accent placement in the realization of information structure. Cognition, 79(3):301-371.
22. Keller, Frank and Ash Asudeh. 2002. Probabilistic learning algorithms and optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(2):225-244.
23. Keller, Frank, Martin Corley, and Christoph Scheepers. 2001. Conducting psycholinguistic experiments over the World Wide Web. Unpublished manuscript, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K., and Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
24. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Lapata, Maria, Frank Keller, and Scott McDonald. 2001. Evaluating smoothing algorithms against plausibility judgments. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, France, pages 346-353.
26. Lascarides, Alex and Ann Copestake. 1998. Pragmatics and word meaning. Journal of Linguistics, 34(2):387-414.
27. Leech, Geoffrey, Roger Garside, and Michael Bryant. 1994. The tagging of the British national corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japan, pages 622-628.
28. Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Li, Hang and Naoki Abe. 1998. Generalizing case frames using a thesaurus and the MDL principle. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):217-244.
30. Light, Marc. 1996. Morphological Cues for Lexical Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester.
31. Lodge, Milton. 1981. Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
32. Macleod, Catherine, Ralph Grishman, Adam Meyers, Leslie Barrett, and Ruth Reeves. 1998. Comlex: A lexicon of nominalizations. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of the European Association for Lexicography, Liège, Belgium, pages 187-193.
33. Markert, Katja and Udo Hahn. 1997. On the interaction of metonymies and anaphora. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya, Japan, pages 1010-1015.
34. McCarthy, Diana. 2000. Using semantic preferences to identify verbal participation in role switching alternations. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, pages 256-263.
35. McElree, Brian, Matthew J. Traxler, Martin J. Pickering, Rachel E. Seely, and Ray Jackendoff. 2001. Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition, (78)1:17-25.
36. Merlo, Paola and Susanne Stevenson. 2001. Automatic verb classification based on statistical distribution of argument structure. Computational Linguistics, 27(3):373-408.
37. Miller, George A., Richard Beckwith, Christiane Fellbaum, Derek Gross, and Katherine J. Miller. 1990. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4):235-244.
38. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12(1):109-132.
39. Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4):409-441.
40. Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge.
41. Pustejovsky, James and Pierrette Bouillon. 1995. Logical polysemy and aspectual coercion. Journal of Semantics, 12:133-162.
42. Resnik, Philip. 1993. Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
43. Resnik, Philip. 1999. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 95-130.
44. Resnik, Philip and Mona Diab. 2000. Measuring verb similarity. In Lila R. Gleitman and Aravid K. Joshi, editors, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pages 399-404.
45. Rooth, Mats, Stefan Riezler, Detlef Prescher, Glenn Carroll, and Franz Beil. 1999. Inducing a semantically annotated lexicon via em-based clustering. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, College Park, Maryland, pages 104-111.
46. Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammatically Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. Siegel, Eric and Kathleen McKeown. 2000. Learning methods to combine linguistic indicators: Improving aspectual classification and revealing linguistic insights. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):595-629.
48. Stevens, S. Smith. 1975. Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects. Wiley, New York.
49. Utiyama, Masao, Masaki Murata, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2000. A statistical approach to the processing of metonymy. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Saarbrücken, Germany, pages 885-891.
50. Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and Nominalizations. Mouton, The Hague, the Netherlands.
51. Verspoor, Cornelia Maria. 1997. Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K.
52. Weiss, Sholom M. and Casimir A. Kulikowski. 1991. Computer Systems that Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning, and Expert Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California.