The missing mousterian

Current Anthropology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 777-803

  Dibble, Harold L ^a   McPherron, Shannon P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750121782     PISSN: 00113204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/506282     Document Type: Article

References (142)

1. Ambrose, S. H. 2002. Small things remembered: Origins of early microlithic industries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Thinking small: Global perspectives on mircolithization, ed. R. G. Elston and S. L. Kuhn, 9-30. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association. [JJS]
2. Amick, D., and R. P. Mauldin. 1989. Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's "debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation." American Antiquity 54:166-68. [ST]
3. Anderson-Gerfaud, P. 1990. Aspects of behaviour in the Middle Paleolithic: Functional analysis of stone tools from south-west France. In The emergence of modern humans, ed. Paul Mellars, 389-418. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [BLH]
4. Andrefsky, W., Jr. 1994. Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity 59:21-34. [GBT]
5. Andrefsky, W., Jr. ed. 2001. Lithic debitage: Context, form, and meaning. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. [ST]
6. Antoine, M. 1938. Notes de préhistoire marocaine. 14. Un cône de résurgence du Paléolithique moyen à Tit Mellil, près de Casablanca. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique de Maroc 12:3-95. [AB]
7. Ashton, N. M., J. Cook, S. G. Lewis, and J. Rose. 1992. High Lodge: Excavations by G. de G. Sieveking 1962-68 and J. Cook 1988. London: British Museum Press. [NA]
8. Bar-Yosef, O., and H. L. Dibble. 1995. Preface. In The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology, ed. H. L. Dibble and O. Bar-Yosef, ix-xiii. Madison: Prehistory Press. [GBT]
9. Bar-Yosef, O., and H. L. Dibble. 2005. Preface. In The definition and interpretation of Levallois variability. Madison: Prehistory Press.
10. Baumler, M. F., and L. B. Davis. 2000. Upon closer examination: Paleoindian behavioral inferences from a Folsom feature lithic assemblage at the Indian Creek occupation site, west-central Montana Rockies. Archaeology in Montana 41(2):17-62. [GBT]
11. Baumler, M. F., and L. B. Davis. 2004. The role of small-sized debitage in aggregate lithic analysis. In Aggregate analysis in chipped stone, ed. C. Hall and M. L. Larson, 45-64. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. [GBT]
12. Baxter, J. 2005. The archaeology of childhood: Children, gender, and material culture. Lanham, Md.: AltaMira Press. [JJS]
13. Belfer-Cohen, A., and N. Goren-Inbar. 1994. Cognition and communication in the Levantine Lower Palaeolithic. World Archaeology 26:144-57. [ST]
14. Beyries, S. 1988. Industries lithiques: Traceologie et technologie. 2 vols. British Archaeological Reports International Series 411. [BLH]
15. Binford, L. R. 1981. Bones: Ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic Press. [PV]
16. Binford, L., and S. Binford. 1966. A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist 68:238-95.
17. Bisson, M. S. 2000. Nineteenth-century tools for twenty-first-century archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic typology of François Bordes must be replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7:1-48.
18. Boëda, E. 1986. Approche technologique du concept Levallois et evaluation de son champ d'application. Ph.D. diss., Université de Paris.
19. Boëda, E. 1994. Le concept Levallois: Variabilité des méthodes. Monographie du CRA 9. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. [GBT]
20. Boëda, E., J. Connan, D. Dessort, S. Muhesen, N. Mercier, H. Valladas, and N. Tisnerat. 1996. Bitumen as a hafting material on Middle Paleolithic artefacts. Science 380: 336-38. [BLH]
21. Bordes, F. 1961a. Typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
22. Bordes, F. 1961b. Mousterian cultures in France. Science 134.
23. Bordes, F. 1975. Le gisement de Pech de l'Azé IV: Note préliminaire. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 72: 293-308.
24. Bordes, F., and M. Bourgon. 1951. Le complexe mousterien: Mousterien, Levalloisien, et Tayacien. L'Anthropologie 55: 1-23.
25. Bourguignon, L., 1997. Le Moustérien de type Quina: Nouvelle définition d'une technique, 2 vols. Ph.D. diss., Université de Paris X-Nanterre. [AT]
26. Bourguignon, L., J.-Ph. Faivre, and A. Turq. 2004. Ramification des chaînes opératoires: Une spécificité du Moustérien? Paléo no. 15. [AT]
27. Bourguignon, L., and A. Turq. 2003. Une chaîne opératoire de débitage discoïde sur éclat du Moustérien à denticulés aquitain: Les exemples de Champs de Bossuet et de Combe-Grenal c. 14. In Discoid lithic technology: Advances and implications, ed. Marco Peresani, 131-52. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1120. [AT]
28. Bouzouggar, A. 1997a, Matières premières, processus de fabrication et de gestion d'outils dans la séquence atérienne de la grotte d'El Mnasra I (grotte des Contrebandiers) à Témara (Maroc). Ph.D. diss., Université Bordeaux I. [AB]
29. Bouzouggar, A. 1997b. Économie des matières premières et gestion du débitage dans la séquence atérienne de la grotte des Contrebandiers à Témara (Maroc). Préhistoire et Anthropologie Méditerranéennes 6:35-51. [AB]
30. Bouzouggar, A., J. Kozlowski, and M. Otte. 2002. Étude des industries lithiques atériennes de la grotte El Aliya à Tanger (Maroc). L'Anthropologie 106:207-48. [AB]
31. Brézillon, M. 1968. La dénomination des objets de pierre taillée: Matériaux pour un vocabulaire des préhistoriens de langue française. Gallia Préhistoire suppl. 7.
32. Cahen, Daniel, Lawrence H. Keeley, and F. Van Noten. 1979. Stone tools, toolkits, and human behavior in prehistory. Current Anthropology 20:661-86.
33. Churchill, S. E. 2001. Hand morphology, manipulation, and tool use in Neanderthals and early modern humans of the Near East. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98:2953-55.
34. Clark, J. G. D. 1968. World prehistory: A new outline. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [SEC]
35. Clarke, D. L. 1986. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen. [PV]
36. Coon, C. 1951. Cave explorations in Iran. Philadelphia: University Museum Press.
37. Crew, H. L. 1976. The Mousterian site of Rosh Ein Mor. In Prehistory and paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel, vol. 1, The Avdat/Agev area, pt. 1, ed. A. E. Marks, 75-112. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.
38. Dauvois, M. 1981. De la simultaneité des concepts Kombewa et Levallois dans l'Acheuléen de Maghreb et du Sahara nord-occidental. In Préhistoire africain, ed. C. Roubet, H. Hugot, and G. Souville, 313-21. Paris: Éditions A.D.P.F.
39. Davidson, I., and W. Noble. 1993. Tools and language in human evolution. In Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution, ed. K. Gibson and T. Ingold, 363-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Debénath, A. 1988. Recent thoughts on the Riss and Early Würm lithic assemblages of La Chaise de Vouthon (Charente, France). In Upper Pleistocene prehistory of western Eurasia, ed. H. L. Dibble and A. Montet-White, 85-89. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
41. Debénath, A., and H. L. Dibble. 1994. The handbook of Paleolithic typology. Vol. 1. The Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
42. Delagnes, A., 1992. L'organisation de la production lithique au Paléolithique moyen: Approche technologique à partir de l'étude des industries de la Chaise-de-Vouthon (Charente). 2 vols. Paris: Université de Paris X-Nanterre. [AT]
43. Dibble, H. L. 1984. The Mousterian industry from Bisitun Cave (Iran). Paléorient 10:23-34.
44. Dibble, H. L. 1985. Raw material variability in Levallois flake manufacture. Current Anthropology 26:391-93. [AB]
45. Dibble, H. L. 1986. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52:109-17. [PV]
46. Dibble, H. L. 1988a. Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian. In Upper Pleistocene prehistory of western Eurasia, ed. H. L. Dibble and A. Montet-White, 181-87. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
47. Dibble, H. L. 1988b. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction patterns. In L'homme de Néandertal, vol. 4, La technique, ed. L. Binford and J. Ph. Rigaud, 49-59. Liège: Université de Liège. [PV]
48. Dibble, H. L. 1989. The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Middle Paleolithic. In The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans, ed. P. Mellars and C. B. Stringer, 415-32. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
49. Dibble, H. L. 1991. Local raw material exploitation and its effects on Lower and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In Raw material economies among prehistoric hunter-gatherers, ed. Anta Montet-White and Steve Holen, 33-48. University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology 19. [AB]
50. Dibble, H. L. 1995a. Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2:299-368.
51. Dibble, H. L. 1995b. Biache-Saint-Vaast, Level Ia: A comparison of approaches. In The definition and interpretation of Levallois variability, ed. H. L. Dibble and O. Bar-Yosef, 93-116. Madison: Prehistory Press.
52. Dibble, H. L. 1995c. Raw material availability, intensity of utilization, and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), ed. H. Dibble and M. Lenoir, 289-315. Philadelphia: University Museum Press.
53. Dibble, H. L., and O. Bar-Yosef, eds. 1995. The definition and interpretation of Levallois variability. Madison: Prehistory Press.
54. Dibble, H. L., and S. J. Holdaway. 1990. Le Paléolithique moyen de l'abri sous roche de Warwasi et ses relations avec le Moustérien du Levant. L'Anthropologie 94: 619-42.
55. Dibble, H. L., and S. McPherron. 2006. Truncated-faceted pieces: Hafting modification, retouch, or cores. In Tools versus cores: Alternative approaches to stone tool analysis, ed. S. McPherron, 50-71. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
56. Dibble, H. L., S. McPherron, P. G. Chase, W. Farrand, and A. Debénath. 2006. Anthropology, taphonomy, and the concept of Paleolithic cultures: A study of the Tayacian from Fontéchevade (Charente, France). PaleoAnthropology 2006:1-21.
57. Dibble, H. L., T. Raczek, and S. McPherron. 2005. Excavator bias at the site of Pech de l'Azé IV, France. Journal of Field Archaeology 30:317-28.
58. Dibble, H. L., and N. Rolland. 1992. On assemblage variability in the Middle Paleolithic of Western Europe: History, perspectives, and a new synthesis. In The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, behavior, and variability, ed. H. L. Dibble and P. Mellars, 1-20. Philadelphia: University Museum Press.
59. Dunnell, R. C. 1971. Systematics in prehistory. New York: Free Press. [PV]
60. Ensor, H. B., and E. Roemer Jr. 1989. Comments on Sullivan and Rozen's debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 54:175-78. [ST]
61. Fonton, M., V. Lhomme, and M. Christensen. 1991. Un cas de "réduction" et de transformation d'un outil au Paléolithique moyen: Un racloir déjeté de la grotte du Coustal à Noailles, Corrèze. Paléo no. 3, 43-47. [AT]
62. Frison, G. 1968. A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity 33:149-55.
63. Geneste, J-M. 1985. Analyse lithique d'industries moustériennes du Périgord: Une approche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolithique moyen. Ph.D. diss., Université de Bordeaux 1.
64. Geneste, J-M., and H. Plisson. 1996. Production et utilisation de l'outillage lithique dans le Moustérien du Sud-ouest de la France: Les Tares à Sourzac, vallée de l'Isle, Dordogne. In Reduction processes (Chaînes opératoires) for the European Mousterian: Proceedings of the International Round Table, Rome, May 26-28. 1995. ed. A. Bietti and S. Grimaldi, 343-68. Quaternaria Nova 6 [AT]
65. Gibson, Kathleen R., and Tim Ingold, eds. 1993. Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Gordon, D. 1993. Mousterian tool selection, reduction, and discard at Ghar, Israel. Journal of Field Archaeology 20: 105-218.
67. Goren-Inbar, N. 1988. Tool small to be true? Reevaluation of cores on flakes in Levantine Mousterian assemblages. Lithic Technology 17:37-44.
68. Goren-Inbar, N., and I. Saragusti. 1996. An Acheulian biface assemblage from Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel: Indications of African affinities. Journal of Field Archaeology 23:15-30. [ST]
69. Gowlett, J. A. J. 1984. Mental abilities of early man: A look at some hard evidence. In Hominid evolution and community ecology: Prehistoric human adaptation in biological perspective, ed. R. A. Foley, 167-92. London: Academic Press.
70. Hardy, B. L., M. Kay, A. E. Marks, and K. Monigal. 2001. Stone tool function at the Paleolithic sites of Starosele and Buran Kaya III, Crimea: Behavioural implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98: 10972-77. [BLH]
71. Henri-Martin, G. 1957. La Grotte de Fontechevade. Pt. 1. Historique, fouilles, stratigraphie, archéologie. Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine 28.
72. Hiscock, P. 1996. Mobility and technology in the Kakadu coastal wetlands. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 15:151-57. [PH]
73. Hiscock, P. 2004. Slippery and Billy: Intention, selection, and equifinality in lithic artefacts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14:71-77. [PH]
74. Hiscock, P. 2006. Blunt and to the point: Changing technological strategies in Holocene Australia. In Archaeology in Oceania: Australia and the Pacific Islands, ed. I. Lilley, 69-95. Oxford: Blackwell. [PH]
75. Hiscock, P., and C. Clarkson, n.d. Retouched notches at Combe Grenal (France) and the reduction hypothesis. American Antiquity. In press. [PH]
76. Holdaway, Simon, Barb Roth, and Shannon P. McPherron. 1996. Notched tool reuse and raw material variability in French Middle and Lower Paleolithic sites. American Antiquity 61:377-87.
77. Holloway, R. L. 1969. Culture: A human domain. Current Anthropology 10:395-412.
78. Holloway, R. L. 1981. Culture, symbols, and human brain evolution. Dialectical Anthropology 5:287-303.
79. Hovers, E. 2006. The many faces of cores-on-flakes: A perspective from the Levantine Mousterian. In Tools versus cores: Alternative approaches to stone tool analysis, ed. S. McPherron, 29-69. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
80. Kardulias, N., and R. Yerkes. 1996. Microwear and metric analysis of threshing sledge flints from Greece and Cyprus. Journal of Archaeological Science 23:657-66. [BLH]
81. Kohn, M., and S. Mithen. 1999. Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73:518-26.
82. Kuhn, S. L. 1992. Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity 57: 115-28. [WAN]
83. Kuhn, S. L. 1994. A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits. American Antiquity 59:426-42. [GBT]
84. Kuhn, S. L. 1995. Mousterian lithic technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [SEC, WAN]
85. Leakey, L. S. B. 1931. The Stone Age cultures of Kenya Colony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. McBrearty, S. L. Bishop, T. Plummer, R. Dewar, and N. J. Conard. 1998. Tools underfoot: Human trampling as an agent of lithic artifact edge modification. American Antiquity 63:108-29.
87. McBrearty, S., and A. S. Brooks. 2000. The revolution that wasn't: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution 39:453-563. [SEC]
88. McDonald, M. 1991. Systematic reworking of lithics from earlier cultures in the Early Holocene of Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt. Journal of Field Archaeology 18:269-73.
89. McPherron, S. P. 1994. A reduction model for variability in Acheulean biface morphology. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
90. McPherron, S. P. 1995. A re-examination of the British biface data. Lithics 16:47-63.
91. McPherron, S. P. 2000. Handaxes as a measure of mental capabilities of early hominids. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 655-63. [GBT]
92. McPherron, S. P. 2003. Typological and technological variability in the bifaces from Tabun Cave, Israel. In From prehistoric bifaces to human behavior: Multiple approaches to the study of bifacial technology, ed. Marie Soressi and Harold Dibble. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum Press.
93. McPherron, S. P., and H. L. Dibble. 2000. The lithic assemblages of Pech de l'Azé IV (Dordogne, France). Préhistoire Européenne 15:9-43.
94. McPherron, S. P., M. Soressi, and H. L. Dibble. 2001. Deux nouveaux projets de recherche à Pech de l'Azé (Dordogne, France). Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest 8:11-30.
95. Marks, A. E., and P. Volkman. 1983. Changing core reduction strategies: A technological shift from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in the southern Levant. In The Mousterian legacy, ed. E. Trinkaus, 13-34. British Archaeological Reports International Series 164.
96. Meignen, L. 1988. Un exemple de comportement technologique différentiel selon les matières premières: Marillac, couches 9 et 10. In L'homme de Neandertal, vol. 4, La technique, ed. L. Binford and J.-P. Rigaud, 71-80. Liège: ERAUL.
97. Mellars, P. 1969. The chronology of Mousterian industries in the Périgord region of south-west France. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35:134-71.
98. Mellars, P. 1996. The Neanderthal legacy: An archaeological perspective from Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
99. Moncel, M-H. 2003. Tata (Hongrie): Un assemblage microlithique du début du Pléistocène supérieur en Europe Centrale. L'Anthropologie 107:117-51.
100. Mora, R., I. De La Torre, and J. M. Moreno. 2004. Middle Palaeolithic mobility and land use in the Southwestern Pyrenees: The example of level 10 in La Roca Dels Bous (Noguera, Catalunya, Northeast Spain). In Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age, vol. 2, ed. N. J. Conard, 415-35. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag. [AB]
101. Morin, E. 2004. An experimental model for interpreting Levallois patterning and toolkit transport. In Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age, vol. 2, ed. N. J. Conard, 317-41. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag. [MV]
102. Morrow, T. A. 1996. Bigger is better: Comments on Kuhn's formal approach to mobile toolkits. American Antiquity 61: 581-90. [MV]
103. Moss, E. 1986. Aspects of site comparison: Debitage samples, technology, and function. World Archaeology 18:116-33. [ST]
104. Newcomer, M. H., and F. Hivernel-Guerre. 1974. Nucléus sur éclat: Technologie et utilisation par différentes cultures préhistoriques. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 71: 119-28. [AT]
105. Nielson, A. 1991. Trampling the archaeological record: An experimental study. American Antiquity 56:483-503.
106. Niewoehner, W. A. 2001. Behavioral inferences from the Skhul/Qafzeh early modern human hand remains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98: 2979-84.
107. Niewoehner, W. A. n.d. Neanderthal hands in their proper perspective. In Neanderthals revisited: New approaches and perspectives, ed. T. Harrison and K. Harvati. New York: Plenum. [WAN]
108. Niewoehner, W. A., A. H. Weaver, and E. Trinkaus. 1997. Neandertal capitate-metacarpal articular morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 103:219-33.
109. Nishiaki, Y. 1985. Truncated-faceted flakes from Levantine Mousterian assemblages. University of Tokyo Bulletin 4: 215-26.
110. Noble, W., and I. Davidson, 1996. Human evolution, language, and mind: A psychological and archaeological inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [PV]
111. Odell, G. H. 2001. Stone tool research at the end of the millennium: Classification, function, and behavior. Journal of Anthropological Research 9:45-100. [JJS]
112. Otte, M., D. Bonjean, and M. Patou-Mathis, 2001. Contractions temporelles au Paléolithique de Sclayn: L'utilisation de différents paysages. In Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age, ed. N. J. Conard, 267-91. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag. [MV]
113. Owen, W. E. 1938. The Kombewa culture, Kenya Colony. Man 38:203-5.
114. Ramenofsky, A. S., and A. Steffen, eds. 1998. Unit issues in archaeology: Measuring time, space, and style. Sall Lake City: University of Utah Press.
115. Roberts, M. B., and S. A. Parfitt, eds. Boxgrove: A Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex. London: Heritage.
116. Rolland, N. 1981. The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man 16:15-42.
117. Rolland, N., and H. L. Dibble. 1990. A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-99.
118. Roth, B., M. Lenoir, and H. Dibble. 1995. Description of the lithic assemblages. In The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), ed. H. Dibble and M. Lenoir, 41-159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, University Museum Press.
119. Sackett, J. R. 1981. From de Mortillet to Bordes: A century of French Paleolithic research. In Towards a history of archaeology, ed. G. Daniel, 85-99. London: Thames and Hudson.
120. Sandgathe, D. M. 2004. Alternative interpretation of the Levallois reduction technique. Lithic Technology 29:147-59. [GBT]
121. Schlanger, N. 1991. Le fait technique total. Terrain 16:114-30. [PV]
122. Schroeder, B. 1969. The lithic industries from Jerf Ajla and their bearing on the problem of a Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University.
123. Shea, J. J. 1988. Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology 15:441-50. [BLH]
124. Slimak, L., 2004. Les dernières expressions du Moustérien entre Loire et Rhône. Mémoire de Doctorat de l'Université de Provence. [AT]
125. Solecki, R., and R. Solecki. 1970. A new secondary flaking technique at the Nahr Ibrahim Cave site, Lebanon. Bulletin du Musée de Beyrought 23:137-42.
126. Sullivan. A. P., III, and K. C. Rozen. 1985. Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50: 755-79. [ST, GBT]
127. Taschini, M. 1979. La Grotta Breuil al Monte Circeo: Per un impostazione dello studio del Pontiniano. Origino 4:45-78. [WAN]
128. Texier, P.-J., J-P. Brugal, C. Lemorini, and L. Wilson. 1998. Fonction d'un site du Paléolithique moyen en marge d'un territoire: L'abri de La Combette (Bonnieux, Vaucluse). In Économie préhistorique: Les comportements de subsistance au Paléolithique, ed. J-P. Brugal, L. Meignen, and M. Patou-Mathis, 325-48. Sophia Antipolis: Editions APDCA. [MV]
129. Tixier, J. 1958-59. Les industries lithiques d'Aïn Fritissa (Maroc oriental). Bulletin d' Archéologie Marocaine 3: 109-244. [AB]
130. Tixier, J., M.-L. Inizan, and H. Roche. 1980. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée 1: Terminologie et technologie. Valbonne: Cercle de Recherches et d'Études Préhistoriques.
131. Tomášková, S. 2000. The nature of difference: History and lithic use-wear at two Upper Paleolithic sites in Central Europe. British Archaeological Reports International Series/Archaeopress. [ST]
132. Tomášková, S. 2005. What is a burin? Typology, technology, and interregional comparison. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12:79-115. [ST]
133. Tomka, S. A. 2001. The effect of processing requirements on reduction strategies and tool form: A new perspective. In Lithic debitage: Context, form, meaning, ed. W. Andrefsky Jr., 207-23. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. [GBT]
134. Tostevin, G. 2003. Attribute analysis of the lithic technologies of Stránská skála II-III in their regional and inter-regional context. In Stránská skála: Origins of the Upper Paleolithic in the Brno Basin, ed. J. Svoboda and O. Bar-Yosef, 77-118. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 47. [GBT]
135. Trinkaus, E., and I. Villemeur. 1991. Mechanical advantages of the Neandertal thumb in flexion: A test of a hypothesis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 84:249-60. [WAN]
136. Turq, A. 2003. Le Paléolithique inférieur et moyen entre les vallées de la Dordogne et du Lot. Paléo, suppl. 2. [AT]
137. Turq, A., and J. G. Marcillaud. 1976. Les racloirs à amincissement de type "Kostienki" de La Plane, commune de Mazeyrolles (Dordogne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 73:75-79.
138. Van Peer, P., and S. Wurz. 2006. The chaîne opératoire concept in Middle Palaeolithic lithic studies: Some problems and solutions. Meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, San Juan, Puerto Rico. http://www.saa.org/meetings/esymposium/197/11.pdf. [ST]
139. Vaquero, M., J. Vallverdú, J. Rosell, I. Pastó, and E. Allué. 2001. Neandertal behavior at the Middle Palaeolithic site of Abric Romaní, Capellades, Spain. Journal of Field Archaeology 28:93-114. [MV]
140. Villemeur, I. 1994. La main des Neandertaliens: Comparaison avec la main des hommes de type moderne morphologie et mécanique. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
141. Wynn, T. 1979. The intelligence of later Acheulian hominids. Man 14:371-91.
142. Wynn, T. 1985. Piaget, stone tools, and the evolution of human intelligence. World Archaeology 17:32-42.