Implicit and explicit attitudes toward athletes with disabilities

Journal of Rehabilitation

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 33-40

  White, Michael J ^a   Jackson, Vance ^a   Gordon, Phyllis ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750100431     PISSN: 00224154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Antonak, R. F. (1980). Psychometric analysis of the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons scale, Form-O. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 23, 169-176.
2. Antonak, R. F. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13(2), 22-29.
3. Antonak, R. F. (1985). Construct validation of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 16(1), 7-10, 48.
4. Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1995). Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 25-38.
5. Bellezza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1986). Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 299-303.
6. Cannon, B. J., & Szuhay, J. A. (1986). Faking can elevate scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30(2), 120-123.
7. Chan, F., Wang, M. H., Thomas, K. R., Wong, D., Chan, C. C. H., Lee, G., & Lui, K. (2002). Conjoint analysis in rehabilitation counseling research. Rehabilitation Education, 16, 179-195.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
10. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
11. Davis, F. (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interactions by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9, 120-132.
12. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
13. Draine, S. (2003). Inquisit (Versions 1.33) [Computer Software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
14. Draine, S. (2005). Inquisit (Version 2.0) [Computer Software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
15. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
16. Evans, J. H. (1976). Changing attitudes towards disabled persons: An experimental study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 19, 572-579.
17. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
18. Feldman, D., Gordon, P. A., White, M. J., & Weber, C. (2002). The effects of people-first language and demographic variables on beliefs, attitudes and behavior intentions toward people with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 33, 18-25.
19. Fiske, S. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 55-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Gething, L., Lacour, J., & Wheeler, B. (1994). Attitudes of nursing home administrators and nurses towards people with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 60, 66-70.
21. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
22. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
23. Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
24. Hardin, B., & Hardin, M. (2003). Conformity and conflict: Wheelchair athletes discuss sport media. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 246-259.
25. Howard, D. J. (1992). Gift-wrapping effects on product attitudes: A mood-biasing explanation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 197-224.
26. Kolodziej, M. E., & Johnson, B. T. (1996). Interpersonal contact and acceptance of persons with psychiatric disorders: A research synthesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1387-1396.
27. Leite, W. L. & Beretvas, S. N. (2005). Validation of Scores on the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 140-154.
28. Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1328-1333.
29. Livneh, H. (1985). Factor structure of attitudes toward people with disabilities - A replication. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 53-58.
30. Olkin, R., & Howson, L. J. (1994). Attitudes toward and images of physical disability. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 81-96.
31. Rao, S. (2004). Faculty attitudes and students with disabilities in higher education: A literature review. College Student Journal, 38, 191-198.
32. Rubin, S. E., & Roessler, R. T. (1995). Foundations of the Vocational Rehabilitation Process (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
33. Rusch, F. R., Wilson, P. G., Hughes, C., & Heal, L. W. (1995). Interaction of persons with severe mental retardation and their nondisabled co-workers in integrated work settings. Behavior Modification, 19(1), 59-77.
34. Thomas, A. (2001). The multidimensional character of biased perceptions of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 3-9.
35. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
36. Vargo, J. W., & Semple, J. E. (1984). Honest versus fake scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale - Form A. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 27, 182-185.
37. Wilson, P. R. (1968). Perceptual distortion of height as a function of ascribed academic status. Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 97-102.
38. Wong, D. W., Chan, F., Cardoso, E. D. S., Lam, C. S., & Miller, S. M. (2004). Rehabilitation counseling students' attitudes toward people with disabilities in three social contexts: A conjoint analysis. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47, 194-204.
39. Wright, B. A. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
40. Yuker, H. E. (1986). The Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale: Susceptibility to faking. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 200-204.
41. Yuker, H. E. (Ed.). (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer.
42. Yuker, H. E., & Block, J. R. (1986). Research with the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scales: 1960-1985. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Center for the Study of Attitudes toward Persons with Disabilities.
43. Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Campbell, W. J. (1960). A scale to measure attitudes toward disabled persons. Albertson, New York: Human Resources Foundation.