Rehabilitation counseling students' attitudes toward people with disabilities in three social contexts: A conjoint analysis

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 194-204

  Wong, Daniel W ^a   Chan, Fong ^b   Da Silva Cardoso, Elizabeth ^c,e   Lam, Chow S ^d,f   Miller, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^d ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^f City University of New York ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142695032     PISSN: 00343552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00343552040470040101     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abroms, K., & Kodera, T. L. (1979). Acceptance hierarchy of handicaps: Validation of Kirk's statement, "Special education begins where medicine stops." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 24-29.
2. Altman, B. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems, 28, 321-337.
3. American Marketing Association. (1992). Conjoint analysis: A guide for designing and interpreting conjoint studies. Chicago: Author.
4. Antonak, R. F. (1980). Psychometric analysis of the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons Scale, Form O. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 23, 169-175.
5. Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities-Methods, psychometric and scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6. Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning. New York: Free Press.
7. Benham, P. K. (1988). Attitudes of occupational therapy personnel toward persons with disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 305-311.
8. Brodwin, M. G., & Orange, L. M. (2002). Attitudes toward disability. In J. D. Andrew & C. W. Faubion (Eds.), Rehabilitation services: An introduction for the human service professional (pp. 174-197). Osage Beach, MO: Aspen.
9. Byrd, E. K., Byrd, P. D., & Emener, W. G. (1977). Students, counselors, and employer perceptions of severely retarded. Rehabilitation Literature, 38, 43-44.
10. Chan, C. C. H., Lee, T. M. C., Yuen, H. K., & Chan, F. (2002). Attitudes towards people with disabilities between Chinese Rehabilitation and Business Students - An implication for practice. Rehabilitation Psychology, 47, 324-338.
11. Chan, F., Hedl, J. J., Parker, H. J., Lam, C. S., Chan, T. N., & Yu, B. (1988). Differential attitudes of Chinese high school students toward three major disability groups: A cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 34, 267-273.
12. Chan, F., Wang, M. H., Thomas, K.R., Wong, D., Chan, C. C. H., Lee, G., et al. (2002). Conjoint analysis in rehabilitation counseling research. Rehabilitation Education, 16, 179-195.
13. Chen, R., Brodwin, M. G., Cardoso, E., & Chan, F. (2002). Attitudes toward people with disabilities in the social context of dating and marriage: A comparison of American, Taiwanese, and Singaporean college students. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68(4), 5-11.
14. Cheung, F. M. (1990). People against the mentally ill: Community opposition to residential treatment facilities. Community Mental Health Journal, 26, 205-212.
15. Chubon, R. A. (1982). An analysis of research dealing with attitudes of professionals toward disability. Journal of Rehabilitation, 48(1), 25-30.
16. Cook, D. (1998). Psychosocial impact of disability. In R. M. Parker & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond (3rd ed., pp. 303-326). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
17. Dooley, D. M., & Gliner, J. A. (1989). Perception of disability labels: Effect of attitude and stimulus presentation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 34, 259-270.
18. Estes, J., Deyer, C. A., Hansen, R. A., & Russell, J. C. (1991). Influence of occupational therapy curricula on students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(2), 156-158.
19. Frank, R., & Elliott, T. (2002). Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Garske, G. G., & Thomas, K. R. (1990). The relationship of self-esteem and contact to attitudes of students in rehabilitation counseling toward people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 67-71.
21. Gilfoyle, E. M., & Gliner, J. A. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped children: Impact of an educational program. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 5, 27-41.
22. Gottlieb, J., & Gottlieb, B. W. (1977). Stereotypic attitudes and behavioral intentions toward handicapped children. American Journal of the Mentally Deficient, 82, 65-71.
23. Grand, S. A., Bernier, J. E., & Strohmer, D. C. (1982). Attitudes toward disabled persons as functions of social context and specific disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 27, 165-174.
24. Green, P. E., St. Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103-123.
25. Hammond, K. R., McClelland, G. H., & Mumpower, J. (1980). Human judgment and decision making. New York: Praeger.
26. Hunt, B., & Hunt, C. S. (2000). Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of undergraduate rehabilitation and business majors. Rehabilitation Education, 14(3), 269-283.
27. Kaplan, S. P., & Thomas, K. R. (1981). Rehabilitation counseling student perceptions of obese clients. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 25, 106-109.
28. Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. (1994). Indirect methods of attitude measurement: Reply to Linkowski and Yuker. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 144-148.
29. Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. F. (1997). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
30. Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Lyons, M. (1991). Enabling or disabling? Students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(4), 311-316.
32. Paris, M. J. (1993). Attitudes of medical students and health-care professionals toward people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 818-825.
33. Rahimi, M., Rosenthal, D., & Chan, F. (2003). Effect of race on clinical judgment of African American undergraduate students in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 157-163.
34. Richardson, S. A., & Ronald, L. (1977). The effect of a physically handicapped interviewer on children's expression of values toward handicap. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 211-218.
35. Rosenthal, D. A., & Berven, N. L. (1999). Effects of client race on clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 243-265.
36. Schmelkin, L. P. (1985). Dimensionality of disability labels. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30, 221-233.
37. Shamir, M., & Shamir, J. (1995). Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis. Political Behavior, 17, 107-133.
38. Siller, J. (1976). Attitudes toward disability. In H. Rusalem & D. Malikin (Eds.), Contemporary vocational rehabilitation (pp. 67-79). New York: New York University Press.
39. Smart, J. (2002). Disability, society, and the individual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
40. Spengler, P. M., Strohmer, D. C., & Prout, H. T. (1990). Testing the robustness of the diagnostic overshadowing bias. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 204-214.
41. SPSS, Inc. (1997). SPSS Conjoint 8.0. Chicago: Author.
42. Strohmer, D. C., & Leierer, S. J. (2000). Modeling rehabilitation counselor clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 3-11.
43. Strohmer, D. C., & Shivy, V. A. (1994). Bias in counselor hypothesis testing: Testing the robustness of counselor confirmatory bias. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 191-198.
44. Sue, D. W., Bernier, J. E., Durran, A., Feinberg, L., Pedersen, P., Smith, E. J., et al. (1982). Position paper: Cross-cultural counseling competencies. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(2), 45-52.
45. Tsang, H. W. H., Chan, C. C. H., & Chan, F. (2001). Conjoint analysis: An alternative approach to studying stigma. Transcultural Psychiatry, 38(1), 136-139.
46. Tsang, H. W. H., Chan, F., & Chan, C. C. H. (in press). Factors influencing attitudes of occupational therapy students toward people with disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.
47. Tsang, W. H., Tam, K. C., Chan, F., & Cheung, W. M. (2003). Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong: Implications for their recovery. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 383-396.
48. Voeltz, L. M. (1980). Children's attitudes toward the amputee child. American Journal of the Mentally Deficient, 84, 455-464.
49. Wang, M. H., Thomas, K., Chan, F., & Cheing, G. (2003). A conjoint analysis of factors influencing American and Taiwanese college students' preferences for people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 195-201.
50. Wilkie, W. L., & Pessemier, E. A. (1973). Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute attitude models. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 428-441.
51. Wittink, D. R., & Cattin, P. (1989). Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. Journal of Marketing, 53, 91-96.
52. Wright, B. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
53. Wright, B. (1988). Attitudes and the fundamental negative bias: Conditions and corrections. In H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward people with disabilities (pp. 3-21). New York: Springer.