Recombinant lines obtained from an interspecific cross between Lycopersicon species selected by fruit weight and fruit shelf life

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 651-656

  Rodríguez, Gustavo R ^a   Pratta, Guillermo R ^a   Zorzoli, Roxana ^a   Picardi, Liliana A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Divergent antagonistic selection; Lycopersicon esculentum; Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium; Random drift; Tomato breeding

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

EID: 33750041652     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.131.5.651     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alpert, K. and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: A major fruit weight quantitative locus in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:15503-15507.
2. Buescher, R.W., W.A. Sistrunk, E.C. Tigchelaar, and T.J. Ng. 1976. Softening, pectolytic activity and storage life of rin and nor tomato hybrids. HortScience 11:603-605.
3. de Vicente, M.C. and S.D. Tanskley. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134:585-596.
4. Eisen, E.J. 1978. Single-trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice. Genetics 88:781-811.
5. Falconer, D.S. and T.F.C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman Group, Edinburgh Gate, England.
6. Ferratto, J.A., A. Longo, R. Grasso, M.C. Mondino, and A.C. Fernández. 1997. Ajuste del diagnóstico agronómico del Proyecto Hortícola Rosario. Publicación miscelánea Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 32:1-48.
7. Foolad, M.R., L.P. Zhang, A.A. Khan, D. Nino-Liu, and G.L. Lin. 2002. Identification of QTLs for early blight, Alternaria solani resistance in tomato using backcross populations of a Lycopersicon esculentum × L. hirsutum cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:945-958.
8. Fulton, T.M., P. Bucheli, E. Voirol, V. Petriard, and S.D. Tanksley. 2002. Quantitative trait loci, QTL affecting sugars, organic acids and other biochemical properties possibly contributing to flavor, identified in four advanced backcross populations of tomato. Euphytica 127:163-177.
9. Grandillo, S., H.M. Ku, and S.D. Tanksley. 1999. Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit and shape in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:978-987.
10. Hallauer, A.R. 1981. Selection and breeding methods, p. 3-55. In: K.J. Frey (ed.). Plant breeding II. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
11. Kearsey, M. and H. Pooni. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman and Hall, Birmingham, U.K.
12. MacArthur, J.W. and L. Butler. 1938. Size inheritance and geometric growth processes in the tomato fruit. Genetics 23:253-268.
13. Miller, J.C. and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationship and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:437-448.
14. Moore S., J. Vrebalov, P. Payton, and J. Giovannoni. 2002. Use of genomics tools to isolate key ripening genes and analyse fruit maturation in tomato. J. Expt. Bot. 53:2023-2030.
15. Mutschler, M.A., D.W. Wolfe, E.D. Cobb, and K.S. Yourstone. 1992. Tomato fruit quality and shelf life in hybrids heterozygous for the alc ripening mutant. HortScience 27:352-355.
16. Ng, T.J. and E.C. Tigchelaar. 1977. Action of the nonripening (nor) mutant on fruit ripening of tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:504-509.
17. Paterson, A.H., S. Damon, J.D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H.D. Rabinowitch, S.E. Lincoln, E.S. Lander, and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: Comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181-197
18. Pratta, G., R. Zorzoli, and L.A. Picardi. 1996. Evaluación de caracteres de interés agronómico en especies del género Lycopersicon. Horticultura Argentina 15:25-32.
19. Pratta, G., R. Zorzoli, and L.A. Picardi. 2000. Interacciones genéticas entre germoplasma silvestre y cultivado de Lycopersicon spp. con efectos sobre la calidad del fruto de tomate. Plant Genet. Resources Nwsl. 124:7-12.
20. Pratta, G., R. Zorzoli, and L.A. Picardi. 2003. Diallel analysis of production traits among domestic, exotic and mutant germplasms of Lycopersicon. Genet. Mol. Res. 2:206-213.
21. Rick, C.M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum, p. 667-678. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester, and A.D. Skelding (eds.). The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic, New York.
22. Schuelter, A.R., F.L. Finger, V.W.D. Casali, S.H. Brommonschenkel, and W.C. Otoni. 2002. Inheritance and genetic linkage analysis of a firm-ripening tomato mutant. Plant Breeding 121:338-342.
23. Shapiro, S.S. and M.B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
24. Sokal, R. and F. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.
25. Tanksley, S.D. and S.R. McCouch. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063-1066.
26. Thompson, A.J., M. Tor, C.S. Barry, J. Vrebalov, C. Orfila, M.C. Jarvis, J.J. Giovannoni, D. Grierson, and G.B. Seymour. 1999. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol. 120:383-389.
27. Weller, J.I., M. Soller, and T. Brody. 1988. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118:329-339.
28. Zorzoli, R., G. Pratta, and L.A. Picardi. 1998. Efecto de los mutantes nor y rin y de genes silvestres sobre características del fruto en Lycopersicon. Mendeliana 13:12-19.
29. 3 de un híbrido interespecífico. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 35:2423-2427.