Diallel analysis of production traits among domestic, exotic and mutant germplasms of Lycopersicon

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 206-213

  Pratta, Guillermo ^a   Zorzoli, Roxana ^a   Picardi, Liliana A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Fruit quality; Fruit shelf life; Plant breeding; Plant genetic resources; Tomato

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALLEL ANALYSIS; FLOWER DEVELOPMENT; FRUIT BREEDING; FRUIT MORPHOLOGY; FRUIT SIZE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GERMPLASM; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOZYGOSITY; HYBRID GENE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; SHELF LIFE; TOMATO; WILD TYPE; CROSS BREEDING; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM;

CROSSES, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTATION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 2342429643     PISSN: 16765680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alpert, K.B. and Tanksley, S.D. (1996). High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: a major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 15503-15507.
2. Bernacchi, D., Beck-Bunn, T., Emmatty, D., Eshed, Y., Inai, S., Lopez, J., Petiard, V., Sayama, H., Uhlig, J., Zamir, D. and Tanksley, S.D. (1998). Advanced backcross QTL analysis of tomato. II. Evaluation of near isogenic lines carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 170-180.
3. Frary, A., Nesbitt, T.C., Grandillo, S., Knaap, E., Cong, B., Lin, J., Meller, J., Elber, R., Alpert, K.B. and Tanksley, S.D. (2000). fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
4. Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust. J. Biol. 9: 463-493.
5. Mather, K. and Jinks, J.L. (1977). Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London, England.
6. Ng, T.J. and Tigchelaar, E.C. (1977). Action of the non-ripening (nor) mutant on fruit ripening of tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102: 504-509.
7. Pratta, G., Zorzoli, R. and Picardi, L.A. (1996). Evaluación de caracteres de interés agronómico en especies del género Lycopersicon. Hort. Arg. 15: 25-32.
8. Rick, C.M. (1979). Potential improvement of tomatoes by controlled introgression of genes from wild species. Proceedings of the Conference on Broadening Genetic Base Crops, 1978. Pudoc, Wagenigen, pp. 167-173.
9. Shapiro, S.S. and Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591-611.
10. Soriano Viana, J.M. (2000). The parametric restrictions of the Griffing diallel analysis model: combining ability analysis. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 877-881.
11. Stevens, M.A. (1986). Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breed. Rev. 4: 273-311.
12. Stevens, M.A. and Rick C.M. (1986). Genetics and breeding. In: The Tomato Crop. A Scientific Basis for Improvement (Athernon, J.G. and Rudich, J., eds.). Chapman and Hall, London, England, pp. 35-109.
13. Tigchelaar, E.C. (1986). Tomato breeding. In: Breeding Vegetable Crops (Basset, M.J., ed.). AVI Publishing Company, Westport, CT, USA, pp. 135-170.
14. Tigchelaar, E.C., McGlason, W.B. and Buescher, R.W. (1978). Genetic regulation of tomato fruit ripening. HortScience 13: 508-513.
15. Weller, J.I., Soller, M. and Brody, T. (1988). Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interespecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pimpinellifolium) by means of genetics markers. Genetics 118: 329-339.
16. Zorzoli, R., Pratta, G. and Picardi, L.A. (1998). Efecto de los mutantes nor y rin y de genes silvestres sobre características del fruto en Lycopersicon. Mendeliana 13: 12-19.