A surgical telemanipulator for femur shaft fracture reduction

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 238-250

  Westphal, R ^a   Winkelbach, S ^a   Gosling T ^b   Hufner T ^b   Faulstich, J ^b   Martin, P ^b   Krettek, C ^b   Wahl, F M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Femur fracture; Force feedback; Fracture reduction; Orthopaedic surgery; Surgical robotics; Telemanipulation

Indexed keywords

BONE; FEEDBACK; MANIPULATORS; NAVIGATION; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

% REDUCTIONS; FEMUR FRACTURE; FORCE-FEEDBACK; FRACTURE REDUCTION; LONG BONE FRACTURES; ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; SURGICAL ROBOTICS; TELEMANIPULATION; WORKING GROUPS;

FRACTURE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR SHAFT FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; ROBOTICS; TELESURGERY; X RAY;

EID: 33750037314     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.81     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 709-720.
2. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Treatment of femoral shaft fractures with an unreamed solid nail (UFN) and standard locking. Op Orthop Traumatol 1998; 6: 179-192.
3. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of 520 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 529-539.
4. Wolinsky PR, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K. Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases. J Trauma 1999; 46: 392-399.
5. Sugarman ID, Adam I, Bunker TD. Radiation dosage during AO locking femoral nailing. Injury 1988; 19: 336-338. doi:10.1016/0020-1383(88)90107-6.
6. Grover J, Wiss DA. A prospective study of fractures of the femoral shaft treated with a static, intramedullary, interlocking nail comparing one versus two distal screws. Orthop Clin N Am 1995; 26: 139-146.
7. Prevot N, Charissoux JL, Fiorenza F, et al. Utilisation d'un clou non fendu de Russel-Taylor pour la stabilisation des fractures du femur. A propos de 57 fractures avec 30 etudes tomodensitometriques de la rotation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1998; 84: 33-40.
8. Strecker W, Suger G, Kinzl L. Lokale Komplikationen der Marknagelung. Orthopade 1996; 25: 274-291.
9. Yang KH, Han DY, Jahng JS, et al. Prevention of malrotation deformity in femoral shaft fracture. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12: 558-562. doi:10.1097/00005131- 199811000-00005.
10. Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robotics Automat 2003; 19(5): 765-781. doi:10.1109/TRA.2003. 817058.
11. Bouazza-Marouf K, Browbank I, Hewit JR. Robotic-assisted internal fixation of femoral fractures. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1995; 209: 51-58.
12. Westphal R, Faulstich J, Gösling T, et al. Fracture reduction using a telemanipulator with haptical feedback. CARS 2003: Proceedings of the 37th International Congress and Exhibition, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. International Congress Series 1256, 25-28 June 2003, London, UK. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; 1369.
13. Westphal R, Winkelbach S, Finkemeyer B, et al. Progress in Robot Assisted Fracture Reduction. Video-proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April 26-30 2004, New Orleans, USA.
14. Gösling T, Westphal R, Hüfner T, et al. Robot-assisted fracture reduction: A preliminary study in the femur shaft. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005; 43: 115-120.
15. BrainLAB AG [homepage on the internet]. BrainLAB AG: Heimstetten, Germany. http://www.brainlab.com/(accessed 27 September 2005).
16. Pelich C, Wahl F. ZERO++-An OOP environment for multiprocessor robot control. IASTED Int J Robotics Automat 1997; 49-57.
17. Microsoft Corp. DirectX [homepage on the internet]. Microsoft Corp: Redmond, USA. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ directx/default.aspx (accessed 27 September 2005).
18. AO Foundation [homepage on the internet]. AO Foundation: Davos, Switzerland. http://www.aofoundation.org/ed (accessed 27 September 2005).
19. Rüedi TP, Murphy WM. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme: Stuttgart, 2000.
20. Winkelbach S, Westphal R, Gösling T. Automatic computation of reposition parameters of fractured long bones based on CT-analysis. CARS 2003, Proceedings of the 17th International Congress and Exhibition, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. International Congress Series 1256, 25-28 June 2003, London, UK. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; 1348.
21. Winkelbach S, Westphal R, Gösling T. Pose Estimation of Cylindrical Fragments for Semi-automatic Bone Fracture Reduction. Pattern Recognition (DAGM 2003). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2781, 10-12 September 2003, Magdeburg, Germany. Springer: Heidelberg, 2003; 566-573.
22. Westphal R, Gösling T, Citak M, et al. Automatisierte Fraktur-reposition basierend auf Kraftmomentensensorik am Beispiel des Femurschaftes. DGU 2004, 68. Jahrestagung Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, 21-23 October 2004, Berlin, Germany [abstract on the internet]. DGU: Berlin, Germany. http://193.97.204.182/dguc2004/frames/fs_start.html (accessed 27 September 2005).
23. Institute for Robotics and Process Control. Robot-assisted Fracture Reduction [homepage on the internet]. Institute for Robotics and Process Control: Braunschweig, Germany. http://www.cs.tu-bs.de/rob/femur.html (accessed 27 September 2005).