Influence of diurnal hyperosmotic loading on the metabolism and matrix gene expression of a whole-organ intervertebral disc model

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1957-1966

  Haschtmann, Daniel ^a   Stoyanov, Jivko V ^a   Ferguson, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Disc cell metabolism; Disc culture model; Disc degeneration; Matrix gene expression; Osmolarity

Indexed keywords

AGGRECAN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 2; DNA; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PROTEOGLYCAN; TETRAZOLIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE METABOLISM; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CELL DEATH; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL STIMULATION; CELL VIABILITY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DNA CONTENT; DNA DETERMINATION; DOWN REGULATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HYPEROSMOLARITY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; ISOLATION PROCEDURE; NITROBLUE TETRAZOLIUM TEST; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; RABBIT; TISSUE CULTURE; UPREGULATION;

AGGRECANS; ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FEMALE; FIBRILLAR COLLAGENS; GENE EXPRESSION; HYPERTONIC SOLUTIONS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LECTINS, C-TYPE; ORGAN CULTURE TECHNIQUES; OXIDOREDUCTASES; PROTEOCHONDROITIN SULFATES; PROTEOGLYCANS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33749856688     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20243     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. 1990. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403-408.
2. Powell MC, Wilson M, Szypryt P, et al. 1986. Prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration observed by magnetic resonance in symptomless women. Lancet 2:1366-1367.
3. Battie MC, Videman T, Parent E. 2004. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine 29:2679-2690.
4. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, et al. 2002. Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 27:2631-2644.
5. Ala-Kokko L. 2002. Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med 34:42-47.
6. Adams MA, Dolan P. 2005. Spine biomechanics. J Biomech 38:1972-1983.
7. Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP, et al. 2000. Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 25:1625-1636.
8. Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, et al. 1995. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine 20:2601-2612.
9. Biering-Sorensen F, Hansen FR, Schroll M, et al. 1985. The relation of spinal x-ray to low-back pain and physical activity among 60-year-old men and women. Spine 10:445-451.
10. Evans W, Jobe W, Seibert C. 1989. A cross-sectional prevalence study of lumbar disc degeneration in a working population. Spine 14:60-64.
11. Kerttula LI, Serlo WS, Tervonen OA, et al. 2000. Post-traumatic findings of the spine after earlier vertebral fracture in young patients: clinical and MRI study. Spine 25:1104-1108.
12. Riihimaki H, Mattsson T, Zitting A, et al. 1990. Radiographicaly detectable degenerative changes of the lumbar spine among concrete reinforcement workers and house painters. Spine 15:114-119.
13. Ariga K, Yonenobu K, Nakase T, et al. 2003. Mechanical stress-induced apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in organ-cultured mouse intervertebral discs: an ex vivo study. Spine 28:1528-1533.
14. Crean JK, Roberts S, Jaffray DC, et al. 1997. Matrix metalloproteinases in the human intervertebral disc: role in disc degeneration and scoliosis. Spine 22:2877-2884.
15. Iatridis JC, Mente PL, Stokes IA, et al. 1999. Compression-induced changes in intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model. Spine 24:996-1002.
16. Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, et al. 1996. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 80:839-846.
17. Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, et al. 2003. Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 21:597-603.
18. Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guegring T, et al. 2005. Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Spine 30:181-187.
19. Kroeber MW, Unglaub F, Wang H, et al. 2002. New in vivo animal model to create intervertebral disc degeneration and to investigate the effects of therapeutic strategies to stimulate disc regeneration. Spine 27:2684-2690.
20. Lotz JC, Chin JR. 2000. Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading. Spine 25:1477-1483.
21. Ohshima H, Urban JP, Bergel DH. 1995. Effect of static load on matrix synthesis rates in the intervertebral disc measured in vitro by a new perfusion technique. J Orthop Res 13:22-29.
22. Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. 2004. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine 29:2724-2732.
23. Urban JP. 2002. The role of the physicochemical environment in determining disc cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans 30:858-864.
24. Chen J, Baer AE, Paik PY, et al. 2002. Matrix protein gene expression in intervertebral disc cells subjected to altered osmolarity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293:932-938.
25. Devin A, Espie P, Guerin B, et al. 1998. Energetics of swelling in isolated hepatocytes: a comprehensive study. Mol Cell Biochem 184:107-121.
26. Ishihara H, Warensjo K, Roberts S, et al. 1997. Proteoglycan synthesis in the intervertebral disk nucleus: the role of extracellular osmolality. Am J Physiol 272: C1499-C1506.
27. Urban JP, Hall AC, Gehl KA. 1993. Regulation of matrix synthesis rates by the ionic and osmotic environment of articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol 154:262-270.
28. Urban JP, Maroudas A. 1981. Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 9:1-10.
29. Chen J, Yan W, Setton LA. 2004. Static compression induces zonal-specific changes in gene expression for extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal proteins in intervertebral disc cells in vitro. Matrix Biol 22:573-583.
30. Boos N, Wallin A, Gbedegbegnon T, et al. 1993. Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. Radiology 188:351-354.
31. Broberg KB. 1993. Slow deformation of intervertebral discs. J Biomech 26:501-512.
32. Hopewell B, Urban JP. 2003. Adaptation of articular chondrocytes to changes in osmolality. Biorheology 40:73-77.
33. Hung CT, LeRoux MA, Palmer GD, et al. 2003. Disparate aggrecan gene expression in chondrocytes subjected to hypotonic and hypertonic loading in 2D and 3D culture. Biorheology 40:61-72.
34. Haschtmann D, Stoyanov JV, Ettinger L, et al. 2006. Establishment of a novel intervertebral disc/endplate culture model - analysis of an ex-vivo in-vitro whole-organ rabbit culture system. Spine (in press).
35. Haschtmann D, Stoyanov JV, Ettinger L, et al. 2005. Establishment of an in-vitro whole organ intervertebral disc/endplate culture model. Eur Cell Mater 20(Suppl. 3): 57-57.
36. Poole CA, Brookes NH, Clover GM. 1993. Keratocyte networks visualised in the living cornea using vital dyes. J Cell Sci 106(Pt 2):685-691.
37. Burton JD. 2005. The MTT assay to evaluate chemosensitivity. Methods Mol Med 110:69-78.
38. Yamamoto Y, Mochida J, Sakai D, et al. 2004. Upregulation of the viability of nucleus pulposus cells by bone marrow-derived stromal cells: significance of direct cell-to-cell contact in coculture system. Spine 29:1508-1514.
39. Ishiyama M, Tominaga H, Shiga M, et al. 1996. A combined assay of cell viability and in vitro cytotoxicity with a highly water-soluble tetrazolium salt, neutral red and crystal violet. Biol Pharm Bull 19:1518-1520.
40. Kugler P. 1982. Quantitative dehydrogenase histochemistry with exogenous electron carriers (PMS, MPMS, MB). Histochemistry 75:99-112.
41. Bjornsson S. 1993. Simultaneous preparation and quantitation of proteoglycans by precipitation with alcian blue. Anal Biochem 210:282-291.
42. Lee CR, Iatridis JC, Poveda L, et al. 2006. In vitro organ culture of the bovine intervertebral disc: effects of vertebral endplate and potential for mechanobiology studies. Spine 31:515-522.
43. Pritchard S, Guilak F. 2004. The role of F-actin in hypoosmotically induced cell volume change and calcium signaling in anulus fibrosus cells. Ann Biomed Eng 32: 103-111.
44. Friis MB, Friborg CR, Schneider L, et al. 2005. Cell shrinkage as a signal to apoptosis in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. J Physiol 567:427-443.
45. Takahashi S, Abe T, Gotoh J, et al. 2002. Substrate-dependence of reduction of MTT: a tetrazolium dye differs in cultured astroglia and neurons. Neurochem Int 40: 441-448.
46. Duncan DR, Widhohn JM. 2004. Osmotic induced stimulation of the reduction of the viability dye 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride by maize roots and callus cultures. J Plant Physiol 161:397-403.
47. Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, et al. 1996. The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest 98:996-1003.
48. Cs-Szabo G, Ragasa-San Juan D, Turumella V, et al. 2002. Changes in mRNA and protein levels of proteoglyeans of the anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus during intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 27:2212-2219.
49. Hutton WC, Toribatake Y, Elmer WA, et al. 1998. The effect of compressive force applied to the intervertebral disc in vivo. A study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 23:2524-2537.
50. Roughley PJ. 2004. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine 29:2691-2699.
51. Sive JI, Baird P, Jeziorsk M, et al. 2002. Expression of chondrocyte markers by cells of normal and degenerate intervertebral discs. Mol Pathol 55:91-97.
52. Le Maitre CL, Hoyland JA, Freemont AJ. 2004. Studies of human intervertebral disc cell function in a constrained in vitro tissue culture system. Spine 29:1187-1195.
53. Anderson DG, Izzo MW, Hall DJ, et al. 2002. Comparative gene expression profiling of normal and degenerative discs: analysis of a rabbit annular laceration model. Spine 27: 1291-1296.
54. Sobajima S, Shimer AL, Chadderdon RC, et al. 2005. Quantitative analysis of gene expression in a rabbit model of intervertebral disc degeneration by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Spine J 5:14-23.
55. Murakami H, Yoon P, Tsai KJ, et al. 2005. Rabbit model of age related disc degeneration: differences in the disc matrix components. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine 32nd Annual Meeting, New York; 268 p.
56. Omlor G, Lorenz H, Engelleiter K et al. 2005. Gene expression profile in different stages of experimental disc degeneration. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine 32nd Annual Meeting, New York; 274 p.