The actor-observer bias in beliefs of interpersonal insights

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 630-642

  Park, Jisun ^a   Choi, Incheol ^b   Cho, Gukhyun ^c  

^a JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actor observer bias; Culture; Interpersonal insights

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749617064     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022106290482     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Choi, I., & Choi, Y. (2002). Culture and self-concept flexibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1508-1517.
2. Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural difference in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949-960.
3. Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 47-63.
4. Fazio, R. H., Effrein, E. A., & Falender, V. J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 232-242.
5. Fiske, A., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differneces in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Johnson, J. T., Robinson, M. D., & Mitchell, E. B. (2004). Inferences about the authentic self: When do actions say more than mental states? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 615-630.
8. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions in the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
9. Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (1998). Yin and Yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 242-302). New York: Guilford.
10. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
11. Masuda, T., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Perceiver-induced constraint and attitude attribution in the Japan and the US: A case for the cultural dependence of the correspondence bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 409-416.
12. Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural similarities and differences in social inference: Evidence from behavioral predictions and lay theories of behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 109-120.
13. Pronin, E., Kruger, J., Savitsky, K., & Ross, L. (2001). You don't know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 639-656.
14. Sande, G. N., Goethals, G. R., & Radloff, C. E. (1988). Perceiving one's own traits and others': The multifaceted self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 13-20.
15. Snyder, M., & Jones, E. E. (1974). Attitude attribution when behavior when behavior is constrained. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.
16. Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
17. Tice, D. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 435-451.