An empirical study of standards development for E-businesses: A social network perspective

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Choi, Beomjin ^a   Raghu, T S ^b   Vinze, Ajay ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E business Standards; Online Standards Groups; Social Network Analysis

Indexed keywords

E-BUSINESS STANDARDS; ONLINE STANDARDS GROUPS; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGERS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STANDARDS;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 33749603935     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.52     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Ahuja, M.K. and Carley, K.M., "Network structure in virtual organizations", Organization Science, 10(6), 1999, 741-757.
2. Barabasi, A.-L., Linked: The new science of networks, Perseus Publishing, 2002.
3. Bijker, W.B., Hughes, T.P., and Pinch, T., The social construction of technological systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
4. Bishop, G.D. and Myers, D.G., "Informational influence in group discussion", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 1974, 92-104.
5. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Freeman, L.C., Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
6. Burt, R.S., Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
7. Cargill, C.F., Information technology standardization: Theory, process, and organizations, Digital Press, Bedford, MA, 1989.
8. Chiu, E., ebXML simplified: A guide to the new standard for global e-commerce, John Wiley, New York, NY, 2002.
9. Choi, B., Raghu, T.S., and Vinze, A., "Addressing a standards creation process: A focus on ebXML", International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 61(5), 2004, 627-648.
10. Connoly, T., "Information processing and decision making in organizations", in B. Staw and G. Salancik (eds.), New Directions in Organizational Behavior (pp. 205-234), 1977, St. Clair, Chicago.
11. David, P.A. and Shurmer, M., "Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services", Telecommunications Policy, 20(10), 1996, 789-815.
12. El-Shinnawy, M. and Vinze, A.S., "Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings", MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 1998, June, 165-198.
13. Finholt, T., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S., "Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups", in J. Galegher, R., E. Kraut, and C. Egido (eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 291-325), 1990, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Freeman, L.C., "Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification", Social Networks, 1, 1979, 215-239.
15. Freeman, L.C., "The sociological concept of "Group": An empirical test of two models", American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1992, 152-166.
16. Friedkin, N.E., "Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity", Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 1984, 235-261.
17. Hemenway, D., Industrywide voluntary product standards, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1975.
18. Garcia, D.L., "Standards setting in the United States: Public and private sector roles", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(8), 1992, 531-537.
19. Garud, R., Jain, S., and Kumaraswamy, A., "Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java", Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2002, 196-214.
20. Gibb, B., and Damodaran, S., ebXML: Concepts and application, Wiley, Indianapolis, IN, 2003.
21. Gibbons, A., Algorithmic graph theory, Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 1985.
22. Hawkins, R., "The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: Emerging implications for policy", Telecommunications Policy, 23(2), 1999, 159-173.
23. Kraut, R. and Streeter, L.A., "Coordination in software development", Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 1995, 69-81.
24. McGrath, J.E., Groups: Interaction and performance, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1984
25. Mintzberg, H., The structuring of organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.
26. Mintzberg, H., Structure in fives: designing effective organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
27. Monge, P.R and Contractor, N.S., Theories of communication networks, Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY, 2003.
28. Provan, K.G. and Milward, B., "Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks", Public Administration Review, 61(4), 2001, 414-424.
29. Putnam, R., Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY, 2000.
30. Rice, R.E., and Love, G., "Electronic emotion, socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated communication network", Communication Research, 14, 1987, 85-108.
31. Rice, RE., Grant, A., Schmitz, J., and Torobin, J., "Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging", Social Networks, 12(1), 1990, 27-55.
32. Richards, W.D. and Barnett, G.A. (Eds), Progress in communication science, 12, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1993.
33. Sivan, Y.Y., "Knowledge age standards: A brief introduction to their dimensions", in K. Jakobs (ed.), Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective, IDEA Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2000.
34. Spivak, S.M., and Winsell, K.A. (eds.), A sourcebook of standards information: Education, access and development, Macmillan, Riverside, NJ, 1991.
35. Stangor, C., Social groups in action and interaction, Psychology Press, New York, 2004.
36. Steiner, I.D, Group process and productivity, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
37. Thompson, J.D., Organizations in action, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1967.
38. Toffler, A., Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century, Bantam Books, New York, NY, 1990.
39. Tushman, M., "Work characteristics and submit communication structure: A contingency analysis", Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 1979, 82-97.
40. Van de Ven, A.H. and Delbecq, A.L., "A task contingent model of work-unit structure", Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 1974, 183-197.
41. Verman, L.C., Standardization: A New Discipline, Archon Books, Hamden, Conn, 1973.
42. Vinokur, A. and Burnstein, E., "The effects of partially shared persuasive arguments in group-induced shifts: A group problem solving approach", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 1974, 305-315.
43. Wageman, R., "Interdependence and group effectiveness", Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1995, 145-180.
44. Wasco, M.M. and Faraj, S., "It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 2000, 155-173.
45. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994
46. Watts, D.J., Six degrees: The science of a connected age, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, 2003.
47. Weiss, M.B.H., and Cargill, C., "Consortia in the standards creation process", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(8), 1992, 559-565.
48. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and Haythornthwaite, C., "Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community", Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 1996, 213-238.
49. Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., and McQueen, R.J., "A cognitive three process model of computer-mediated groups: Theoretical foundations for groupware design", Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(5), 2000, 431-456.