Stakeholder participation in the design of environmental policy mixes

Ecological Economics

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 100-110

  Santos, Rui ^a   Antunes, Paula ^a   Baptista, Gualter ^a   Mateus, Pedro ^a   Madruga, Luísa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Design of environmental policy instruments; Market based instruments; Stakeholder participation; Sustainable pig farming; Voluntary approaches

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LIVESTOCK FARMING; PIG; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

EURASIA; EUROPE; PORTUGAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33749595612     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baeke S., De Clercq M., and Matthijs F. The nature of voluntary approaches: empirical evidence and patterns. Literature Survey. CAVA Working Paper no. 99/08/3 (1999)
2. Baumol W., and Oates W. The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. Swedish Journal of Economics 1 (1971) 42-54
3. Beierle T. Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review 16 3/4 (1999) 75-103
4. Bryner G. Cooperative instruments and policy making: participation in US environmental regulation. European Environment 11 (2001) 49-60
5. Burtraw D. Cost savings, market performance and economic benefits of the U.S. acid rain program. In: Scorrell S., and Skea J. (Eds). Pollution for Sale - Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation (1999), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
6. Cerin P., and Karlson L. Business incentives for sustainability: a property rights approach. Ecological Economics 40 (2002) 13-22
7. Coase R. The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics 3 4 (1960) 1-44
8. Coglianese C., and Nash J. Bolstering private environmental management. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Paper Series (2001) RWP01-011
9. In: Convery F., and Rooney S. (Eds). Making Markets Work for the Environment (1998), Environmental Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
10. Dales J. Land, water and ownership. Canadian Journal of Economics 1 (1968) 797-804
11. Daly H. Allocation, distribution and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable. Ecological Economics 6 (1992) 185-193
12. de Boer J. Sustainability labelling schemes: the logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders. Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (2003) 254-264
13. de Marchi B., and Ravetz J. Participatory approaches to environmental policy. Environmental Valuation in Europe, Policy Research Brief (2001), Cambridge Research for the Environment n° 10
14. Dietz F., and Vollebergh H. Explaining instruments choice in environmental policies. In: Van der Bergh J. (Ed). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
15. Field B., and Field M. Environmental Economics - An Introduction. 3rd Edition (2002), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
16. Funtowicz S., and Ravetz J. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics 10 (1994) 197-207
17. Funtowicz S., Martinez-Allier J., Munda G., and Ravetz J. Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. Environmental Issue Series Report No 9 (1999), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
18. Gallastegui I. The use of eco-labels: a review of the literature. European Environment 12 (2002) 316-331
19. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 402 (1999) C81-C84
20. Goodstein E. Economics and the Environment. 2nd Edition (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
21. Gustafsson B. Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management. Ecological Economics 24 (1998) 259-274
22. Irvin R., and Stansbury J. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review, January/February 2004 64 1 (2004) 55-65
23. Levinson A. Why oppose TDR's?: transferable development rights can increase overall development. Regional Science and Urban Economics 27 (1997) 283-296
24. Mech T., and Young M. VEMAs. Designing voluntary environmental management arrangements to improve natural resource management in agriculture and allied rural industries. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation - RIRDC (2001), CSIRO Land and Water, Australia
25. Mech T., Lowe K., and Cole A. Land Stewardship and Environmental Management Systems (2003), Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria
26. Montgomery W. Markets and licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory 5 (1972) 395-418
27. Muller E. Environmental labelling, innovation and the toolbox of environmental policy. Lessons Learned from the German Blue Angel Program (2002), Federation of German Consumer Organisations, Berlin
28. OECD. Citizens as partners. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Decision Making (2001), OECD, Paris
29. OECD. Voluntary approaches to environmental policy. Effectiveness, Efficiency and Use in Policy Mixes (2003), OECD, Paris
30. Panayotou T. Conservation of biodiversity and economic development: the concept of transferable development rights. Environmental and Resource Economics 4 (1994) 91-110
31. Petts J. Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 2 (2001) 207-226
32. Romstad E. Team approaches in reducing nonpoint source pollution. Ecological Economics 47 (2003) 71-78
33. Russell C., and Powell P. Practical considerations and comparison of instruments of environmental policy. In: Van der Bergh J. (Ed). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
34. Santos R., and Antunes P. Instrumentos económicos de política de ambiente. In: Conselho Económico e Social (Ed). Ambiente, Economia e Sociedade, Série Estudos e Documentos (1999), CES, Lisboa
35. Santos, R., Antunes, P., Augusto, Santos, J. P., Oliveira, P. 2002. Inquérito às Explorações Suinícolas de Montemor-o-Novo. Relatório Técnico - Projecto PIGS, Centro de Economia Ecológica e Gestão do Ambiente, DCEA FCT-UNL, Monte da Caparica.
36. Santos, R., Antunes, P., Mateus, P., Baptista, G., Madruga, L., 2003. Desenvolvimento de um Sistema de Instrumentos de Política de Ambiente para o Sector Suinícola de Montemor-o-Novo. Relatório Técnico, Centro de Economia Ecológica e Gestão do Ambiente, DCEA FCT-UNL.
37. Solomon B. New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics. Ecological Economics 30 (1999) 371-387
38. Stavins R. Experience with market based environmental policy instruments. In: Mäler K.-G., and Vincent J. (Eds). Handbook of Environmental Economics vol. 1 (2003), North-Holland Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 355-435
39. Tinbergen J. On the Theory of Economic Policy (1952), North Holland Press, Amsterdam
40. van den Hove S. Participatory approaches to environmental policy making: the European commission climate policy process as a case study. Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 457-472
41. Weersink A., Livernois J., Shogren J., and Shortle J. Economic instruments and environmental policy in agriculture. Canadian Public Policy - Analyse de Politiques vol. XXIV (1998) 309-327 N° 3