Why oppose TDRs?: Transferable development rights can increase overall development

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 283-296

  Levinson, Arik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Marketable permits; Transferable development rights; Zoning

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; MODELLING APPROACH; PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS; URBAN ZONING;

EID: 0031414980     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0462(96)02163-1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Civitas Citizens Inc., 1991, The ABC of Zoning (Civitas, New York).
2. Coase, R.H., 1960, The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1-44.
3. Dales, J., 1968, Pollution, property and prices, (University Press of Toronto, Toronto).
4. Department of City Planning (DCP), New York City, 1989, Regulating residential towers and plazas: issues and options, NYC DCP #89-46, (DCP, New York).
5. Hahn, R.W., 1989, Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 95-114.
6. James, F.J., Jr., and D. Gale, 1977, Zoning for sale: transferable development rights, (Urban Institute, Washington DC).
7. Mills, D.E., 1980, Transferable development rights markets, Journal of Urban Economics 7, 63-74.
8. Oates, W.E., P.R. Portney and A.M. McGartland, 1989, The Net benefits of incentive-based regulation: a case study of environmental standard setting, American Economic Review 79, 1233-1242.
9. Steidlmeier, P., 1993, The morality of pollution permits, Environmental Ethics 15, 133-150.
10. Tripp, J.T.B. and D.J. Dudek, 1989, Institutional guidelines for designing successful transferable rights programs, Yale Journal on Regulation 6, 369-391.
11. The Urban Land Institute, 1982, Office development handbook (Urban Land Institute, Washington DC).
12. Washington Post, May 18, 1987, A-14.