Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: The European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study

Ecological Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 457-472

  Van Den Hove, Sybille ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Climate change; Environmental policy making; European Commission; Participatory approaches; Research Policy interface; Stakeholders participation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING;

EUROPE;

EID: 0034124844     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00165-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beierle, T.C., 1998. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals. Discussion Paper No. 99-06, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
2. Blowers, A., Leroy, P., 1996. Environment and society: shaping the future. In: Blowers, A., Glasbergen, P. (Eds.), Environmental Policy in an International Context, III Prospects for Environmental Change. Arnold, London, pp. 255-283.
3. Blowers A. Environmental policy: ecological modernisation or the risk society? Urban Studies. 34(5-6):1997;845-871.
4. de Marchi B. Uncertainty in environmental emergencies: A diagnostic tool. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 3(2):1995;103-112.
5. Dryzek J., 1990. Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. European Commission, 1997. Towards Sustainability: The European Commission's progress report and action plan on the fifth programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
7. European Communities, 1993. Towards Sustainability: A European community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 138, 17.5.93.
8. Faucheux, S., 1997. The Multi-Stakeholder Paradigm, ESEE Newsletter, No. 2, European Society for Ecological Economics, Paris, 1-2.
9. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures. 25(7):1993;735-755.
10. Gundersen, A., 1995. The Environmental Promise of Democratic Liberation. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
11. Holland, A., O'Connor, M., O'Neill, J., 1996. Costing Environmental Damage: A Critical Survey of Current Theory and Practice and Recommendations for Policy Implementation. European Parliament STOA, Luxembourg.
12. IPCC, 1996. Climate Change 1995: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Second Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Lafferty, W., Meadowcroft, J., 1996. Democracy and the environment: prospects for greater congruence. In: Lafferty, W., Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.), Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 256-272.
14. Mormont M. Towards concerted river management in Belgium. J. Environ. Planning Manag. 39(1):1996;131-141.
15. O'Connor, M., 1998. Walking in the garden(s) of Babylon. An overview of the VALSE Project. C3ED Rapport de Recherche, University of Versailles-St. Quentin en Yvelines.
16. O'Connor M. Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: A reflection. Futures. 31:1999;671-687.
17. O'Connor, M., Faucheux, S., van den Hove, S., 1998. EU Climate Policy: Research Support for Kyoto and Beyond. Policy-Research Interface Workshops Series. EC-DGXII, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
18. O'Connor, M., Faucheux, S., van den Hove, S., 1998. Stakeholders' Perspectives on Climate Change Policies. Workshop Report. EC-DGXII, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg.
19. O'Riordan, T., 1996. Democracy and the sustainability transition. In: Lafferty, W., Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.), Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 140-156.
20. PCSD - The President's Council on Sustainable Development, 1996. Sustainable America. A New Consensus. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
21. Poncelet, E., 1998. When 1+1=3: Synergy and Cultural Production in Multi-Sectoral Environmental Partnerships. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, December 1998.
22. Sors, A., Liberatore, A., Funtowicz, S., Hourcade, J.C., Fellous, J.L., 1997. Prospects for integrated environmental assessment: Lessons learnt from the case of climate change. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Toulouse, October 24-26, 1996.
23. United Nations, 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Annex I. United Nations, New York.
24. United Nations, 1992. Agenda 21. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Annex II. United Nations, New York.
25. van den Hove, S., O'Connor, M., 1997. Social perceptions of environmental issues: a case study looking at people's representations of environmental issues. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 7, (4) (Special Issue), 560-578.
26. van den Hove, S., (Ed.), 1998. Special issue: EU Climate Policy: The European Commission Policy/Research Interface for Kyoto and Beyond. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 10 (4).
27. Yamin, F., 1998. Climate change negotiations: An analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. In: van den Hove, S. (Ed.), Special issue: EU Climate Policy: The European Commission Policy/Research Interface for Kyoto and Beyond. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 10 (4), 428-453.