The politics of domestication and curriculum as pasture in the United States

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 804-811

  Rodriguez, Alberto J ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum change; Education reform; Education standards; Equity, Critique of educational policies; National educational policy; Science education; Teacher education; Teaching for diversity; Teaching for understanding

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749530014     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.040     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bakhtin M.M. In: Holquist M. (Ed). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (1981), University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
2. Bakhtin M.M. In: Emerson C., and Holquist M. (Eds). Speech genres and other late essays (1986), University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
3. Beyer L.E., and Apple M.E. The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (1998), State University of New York Press, New York
4. Council of Chief State School Officers. State indicators of science and mathematics education 2005 (2005), Author, Washington, DC
5. Genesee F., Lindholm-Leary K., Saunders W., and Christian D. English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students at Risk 10 4 (2005) 363-385
6. Linn R.L., Baker E.L., and Betebenner D.W. Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher 31 6 (2002) 3-16
7. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Schools and staffing survey, 1999-2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary and secondary schools. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002313.
8. National Research Council. National Science Education Standards (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
9. Pinar W.F. What is curriculum theory? (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and State University of New York Press, Mahwah, NJ and New York
10. Reschovsky A., and Imazeki J. Let no child be left behind: Determining the cost of improving student performance. Public Finance Review 31 30 (2003) 263-290
11. Rodriguez A.J. The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 1 (1997) 19-37
12. Rodriguez, A. J. (2004). Turning despondency into hope: Charting new paths to improve students' achievement and participation in science education. Tallahassee, FL: Southeast Eisenhower Regional Consortium (SERVE). Retrieved from http://www.serve.org.
13. Rodriguez A.J. Rejecting mediocrity and the politics of domestication. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 21 3 (2005) 47-59
14. Rodriguez, A. J. (in press). Building rovers to bridge the achievement gap: Space exploration at school and at home. In K. Tobin (Ed.), Teaching and learning science: A handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishers.
15. In: Rodriguez A.J., and Kitchen R.S. (Eds). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
16. Rodriguez, A. J., & Zozakiewicz, C. (2005). Using sociotransformative constructivism (sTc) to unearth gender identity discourses in upper elementary schools. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.urbanedjournal.org/index.html.
17. Schmidt W., McKnight C., Cogan L., Jakwerth P., and Houang R. Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education (1999), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
18. Secada W.G., Chavez-Chavez R., Garcia E., Muñoz C., Oakes J., Santiago-Santiago I., and Slavin R. No more excuses: The final report of the Hispanic dropout project (1998), United States Department of Education, Washington, DC
19. Sleeter C. Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom (2005), Teachers College Press, New York
20. United States Census Bureau. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov.
21. United States Department of Education. (1994). Goals 2000: Educate America Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/GOALS2000/TheAct/sec102.html.
22. United States Department of Education. (2001). The No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved from http://ed.gov.nclb.
23. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Weiss I.R., Banilower E.R., McMahon K.C., and Smith P.S. Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education (2001), Horizon Research Inc, Chapel Hill, NC
25. Wertsch J.V. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action (1991), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA