A 24-month follow-up of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in non-carious cervical lesions

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 523-529

  Reis, Alessandra ^a,b   Loguercio, Alessandro D ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK FLOW; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; SINGLE BOND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH ATTRITION; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 33749519197     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/05-116     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. American Dental Association-Council on Scientific Affairs American Dental Association Program Guidelines: Products for Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials, June 2001 (available on-line: www.ada.org).
2. Ausiello P, Apicella A & Davidson CL (2002) Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations-a 3D finite element analysis Dental Materials 18(4) 295-303.
3. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC & Ritter AV (2003) Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: Three-year results Operative Dentistry 28(5) 482-487.
4. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC & Gilner PP (1995) A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified. Glass ionomer restorative material Journal of the American Dental Association 126(9) 1245-1253.
5. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD & Sluder TB (1991) Contributing co-variables in clinical trials American Journal of Dentistry 4(5) 247-250.
6. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P & Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites Journal of the American Dental Association 129(5) 567-577.
7. Belluz MR, Gagliani M, Pedrocca M & Strohmenger L (2004) Class V restorations: In vivo comparison between hybrid and flowable composites Journal of Dental Research 83 Abstract #547 (available on-line:www.iadr.org).
8. Braga RR, Hilton TJ & Ferracane JL (2003) Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers Journal of the American Dental Association 134(6) 721-728.
9. Browning WD, Brackett WW & Gilpatrick RO (2000) Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions Operative Dentistry 25(1) 46-50.
10. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS & Ireland EJ (2004) Clinical evaluation of four Class V restorative materials: 3-year recall American Journal of Dentistry 17(3) 147-150.
11. Choi KK, Condon JR & Ferracane JL (2000) The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite Journal of Dental Research 79(3) 812-817.
12. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB & Brunson WD (1991) Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study Journal of the American Dental Association 122(5) 41-47.
13. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990a) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility Journal of Dental Research 69(6) 1240-1243.
14. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990b) Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 64(6) 658-664.
15. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B & Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives Dental Materials 15(2) 128-137.
16. Landis JR & Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33(1) 159-174.
17. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK & Platt JA (2001) Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners Operative Dentistry 26(3) 302-307.
18. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA & Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 22(4) 195-207.
19. Li Q, Jepsen S, Albers HK & Eberhard J (2006) Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities Dental Materials 22(3) 250-257.
20. Loguercio AD, Bauer JR, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE & Busato AL (2002) Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials Journal of Clinical Dentistry 13(3) 111-115.
21. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN & Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(4) 323-332.
22. Loguercio AD, Zago C, Leal K, Ribeiro NR & Reis A (2005) One-year clinical evaluation of a flowable resin liner associated with a microhybrid resin in non-carious cervical lesions Clinical Oral Investigations 9(1) 18-20.
23. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J & Pashley DH (2000) Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin American Journal of Dentistry 13(6) 324-328.
24. Narhi TO, Tanner J, Ostela I, Narva K, Nohrstrom T, Tirri T & Vallittu PK (2003) Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: One-year evaluation of clinical performance Clinical Oral Investigations 7(4) 241-243.
25. Perdigão J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC & García-Godoy F (2000) Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding Dental Materials 16(5) 311-323.
26. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials Dental Materials 21(9) 864-881.
27. Powell LV, Johnson GH & Gordon GE (1995) Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations Operative Dentistry 20(1) 7-13.
28. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, Carvalho RM, da Julio Singer M & Grande RH (2003) Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(3) 183-192.
29. Reusens B, D'Hoore W & Vreven J (1999) In vivo comparison of a microfilled and hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year follow-up Clinical Oral Investigations 3(2) 62-69.
30. Staninec M & Kawakami M (1993) Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system Dental Materials 9(3) 204-208.
31. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR & Roberson TM (2001) Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 1-6.
32. Tjandrawinata R, Irie M & Suzuki K (2005) Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage Operative Dentistry 30(2) 239-249.
33. Tung F, Estafan D & Scherer W (2000) Microleakage of a condensable composite resin composite: An in vitro investigation Quintessence International 31(6) 430-434.
34. Tyas MJ & Burrow MF (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions American Journal of Dentistry 15(5) 309-311.
35. Unterbrink GL & Liebenberg WH (1999) Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": Literature review and clinical recommendations Quintessence International 30(4) 249-257.
36. Van Dijken JW (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions Dental Materials 16(4) 285-291.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1994) Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems Journal of Dental Research 73(11) 1690-1702.
38. Van Meerbeek B, Conn LJ Jr, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ & Guerrero D (1996) Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of non-demineralized and demineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems Journal of Dentistry 75(3) 879-888.
39. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrecths P & Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235.