Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization

Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies

Volumn , Issue 319, 2005, Pages 1-38

  Mainwaring, Scott ^a,b   Torcal, Mariano ^c,d,e,f,g  

^a Department of Political Science ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^d European Social Survey   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^f UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^g European Science Foundation   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOCRATIZATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; ELECTION; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; PARTY POLITICS;

EID: 33749476670     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Alcántara, Manuel (1995). La elite parlamentaria latinoamericana y el continuo izquierda-derecha. In Wilhelm Hofmeister and Josef Thesing (Eds.), Transfomación de los sistemas políticos en América Latina (pp. 385-410). Buenos Aires: Konrad Adenauer/CIEDLA.
2. Ames, Barry (2001). The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Barnes, Samuel H. (1977). Representation In Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4. Bartolini, Stefano and Mair, Peter (1990). Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bendel, Petra (1993). Partidos políticos y sistemas de partidos en Centroamérica. In Dieter Nohlen (Ed.), Elecciones y sistemas de Partidos en America Latina (pp. 315-353). San José: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos/CAPEL.
6. Bielasiak, Jack (2002). The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States. Comparative Politics, 34(2), 189-210.
7. Budge, Ian (1994). A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science, 24, 443-467.
8. Chalmers, Douglas (1964). The Social Democratic Party of Germany: From Working Class Movement to Modern Political Party. New Haven: Yale University Press.
9. Conaghan, Catherine M. (2000). The Irrelevant Right: Alberto Fujimori and the New Politics of Pragmatic Peru. In Kevin J. Middlebrook (Ed.), Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America (pp. 255-284). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Converse, Philip E. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In David Apter (Ed.) Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: The Free Press.
11. _ (1969). Of Time and Stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2(2), 139-171.
12. Converse, Philip E. and Pierce, Roy (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Coppedge, Michael (1998). The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems. Party Politics, 4(4), 547-568.
14. Cox, Gary (1990). Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems. American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 903-935.
15. Dalton, Robert J. (1985). Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations, Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 276-299.
16. Dalton, Robert J.; McAllister, Ian and Wattenberg, Martin (2000). The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment. In Robert J. Dalton and Martin Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (pp. 37-63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Dix, Robert (1992). Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties. Comparative Political Studies, 24(1), 488-496.
18. Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
19. Enelow, James and Hinich, Melvin (1984). The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ferejohn, John (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice, 50, 5-25.
21. Fleury, Christopher J. and Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1993). Anchoring the French Voter: Ideology versus Party. The Journal of Politics, 55(4), 1100-1109.
22. Fiorina, Morris (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. Fuchs, Dieter and Klingemann, Hans Dieter (1990). The Left-Right Schema. In M. Kent Jennings, Jan W. van Deth, et al. (Eds.), Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies (pp. 203-243). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
24. Fukuyama, Frances (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
25. Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2002). The Effects of Communist Party Transformation on the Institutionalization of Party Systems. In András Bozéki and John Ishiyama (Eds.), The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 323-340). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
26. Guevara Mann, Carlos (2001). Forsaken Virtue: An Analysis of the Political Behavior of Panamanian Legislators, 1984-1999. PhD Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.
27. Gunther, Richard P. and Hopkin, Jonathan (2002). A Crisis of Institutionalization: The Collapse of the UCD in Spain. In Richard P. Gunther, Juan Ramón Montera, and Juan J. Linz (Eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges (pp. 191-230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Hagopian, Frances (1996). Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hartlyn, Jonathan (1988). The Politics of Coalition Rule in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hibbing, John and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hinich, Melvin and Munger, Michael (1994). Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32. Huntington, Samuel (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33. _ (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
34. Inglehart, Ronald (1979). The Impact of Values, Cognitive Level and Social Background. In Samuel H. Barnes, Max Kaase et al. (Eds.), Political Action (pp. 343-380). Beverly Hills: Sage.
35. _ (1984). The Changing Structure of Political Cleavages in Western Society. In Russell J. Dalton, Scott Flanagan, and Paul Beck (Eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? (pp. 24-69). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. _ (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Inglehart, Ronald and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1976). Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left-Right Dimension Among Western Mass Publics. In Ian Budge, Ian Crewe and Dennis Farlie (Eds.), Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition (pp. 243-273). London: John Wiley and Sons.
38. Iversen, Torben (1994a). The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects. Comparative Political Studies, 27(2), 155-189.
39. _ (1994b). Political Leadership and Representation in West European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 45-74.
40. Janda, Kenneth (1980). Political Parties: A Cross National Survey. New York: Free Press.
41. Johnson, Elaine Paige (2002). Streams of Least Resistance: The Institutionalization of Political Parties and Democracy in Indonesia. PhD dissertation, University of Virginia.
42. Kalyvas, Stathis N. (1996). The Rise of Christian Democracy in Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
43. Kiewet, Roderick D. and Kinder, Donald (1979). Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 495-527.
44. Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. _ (2000). Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6/7), 845-879.
46. _ (2003). "Party Competition in Latin America and Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Divergence of Patterns, Similarity of Explanatory Variables." Paper prepared for delivery at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Philadelphia, August 27-31.
47. Kitschelt, Herbert, et al. (1999). Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-party Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1979). Measuring Ideological Conceptualizations. In Samuel H. Barnes, Max Kaase et al. (Eds.), Political Action (pp. 279-303). Beverly Hills: Sage.
49. Knutsen, Oddbjørn (1997). The Partisan and Valuebased Component of the Left-Right Self-placement: Comparative Study. International Political Science Review, 18(2), 191-225.
50. Kuenzi, Michalle and Lambright, Gina (2001). Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries. Party Politics, 7(4), 437-468.
51. Laponce, Jean. A. (1981). Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
52. Legg, Keith and Lemarchand, Rene (1972). Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis. Comparative Politics, 4(2), 149-178.
53. Levitsky, Steven (2003). Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (pp. 1-64). New York: Free Press.
55. Mainwaring, Scott P. (1999). Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. _ (2003). Party Objectives in Contexts of Authoritarianism or Fragile Democracy: A Dual Game. In Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully (Eds.), Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflicts (pp. 3-33). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
57. Mainwaring, Scott; Brinks, Daniel and Pérez-Liñan, Aníbal (2001). Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945-1999. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 37-65.
58. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (1995). Party Systems in Latin America. In Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully (Eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (pp. 1-34). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Mair, Peter (1997). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
60. Markowski, Radek (2000). Party System Institutionalization and Democratic Consolidation: On the Idiosyncracies of the Polish Case. In Janina Frentzel-Zagorska and Jacek Wasilewski (Eds.), The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 65-89). Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences.
61. Mayorga, René Antonio (forthcoming). "Outsiders and Neo-Populism: The Road to Plebiscitary Democracy." In Scott Mainwaring, Ana María Bejarano, and Eduardo Pizarro (Eds.), The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Stanford: \Stanford University Press.
62. Mény, Yves (1990). Government and Politics in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Merrill, III, Samuel and Grofman, Bernard (1999). A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Molina, José and Pérez, Carmen (2004). Radical Change at the Ballot Box: Causes and Consequences of Electoral Behavior in Venezuela's 2000 Elections. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(1), 103-134.
65. Moser, Robert (1995). The Emergence of Political Parties in Post-Soviet Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
66. _ (1999). Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Post-Communist States. World Politics, 51(3), 359-384.
67. _ (2001). Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
68. O'Donnell, Guillermo (1996). Illusions about Consolidation. The Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 34-51.
69. Ostiguy, Pierre (1998). Peronism and Anti-Peronism: Class-Cultural Cleavages and Political Identity in Argentina. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
70. Panebianco, Angelo (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Pedersen, Mogens N. (1983). Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems: Explorations in Explanation. In Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (Eds.), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change (pp. 29-66). Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage.
72. Pizzorno, Alessandro (1981). Interests and Parties in Pluralism. In Suzanne Berger (Ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics (pp. 247-284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Przeworski, Adam (1975). Institutionalization of Voting Patters, or is Mobilization the Source of Decay? American Political Science Review, 69(1), 49-67.
74. Rabinowitz, George and MacDonald, Stuart Elaine (1989). A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 93-121.
75. Rabinowitz, George; MacDonald, Stuart Elaine and Listhaug, Ola (1991). Old Players in an Old Game: Party Strategy in Multiparty Systems. Comparative Political Studies, 24(2), 147-185.
76. Randall, Vicky and Svåsand, Lars (2002). Party Institutionalization in New Democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5-29.
77. Remmer, Karen (1991). The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 777-800.
78. Roberts, Kenneth M. (1995). Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case. World Politics, 48(1), 82-116.
79. Roberts, Kenneth M. and Wibbels, Erik (1999). Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 575-590.
80. Rose, Richard and Munro, Neil (2003). Elections and Parties in New European Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
81. Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio (2003). "How Can Governments be Accountable if Voters Vote Ideologically? Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences." Institute Juan March Working Paper 191 (May).
82. Sani, Giacomo and Sartori, Giovanni (1983). Polarization, Fragmentation, and Competition in Western Democracies. In Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (Eds.), Western European Party Systems (pp. 307-340). Beverly Hills: Sage.
83. Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. _ (1989). Video-Power. Government and Opposition, 24(1), 39-53.
85. Schattschneider, Elmer Eric (1942). Party Government. New York: Farrar and Reinhart.
86. Schedler, Andreas (1995). "Under- and Overinstitutionalization: Some Ideal Typical Propositions Concerning Old and New Party Systems." University of Notre Dame, Kellogg Institute for International Studies Working Paper 213 (March).
87. Scott, James (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91-113.
88. Scully, Timothy R. (1992). Rethinking the Center: Cleavages, Critical Junctures, and Party Evolution in Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
89. Simon, Herbert A. (1996). The Science of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
90. Silveira, Flávio (1998). A Decisão do Voto no Brasil. Porto Alegre: EDIPUC/RS.
91. Stockton, Hans (2001). Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons From Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 94-119.
92. Stokes, Susan (2001). Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Stoner Weiss, Kathryn (2001). The Limited Reach of Russia's Party System: Underinstitutionalization in Dual Transitions. Politics and Society, 29(3), 385-414.
94. Tilly, Charles (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
95. Tóka, Gábor (1997). Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in East Central Europe. In Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien (Eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives (pp. 93-134). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
96. Torcal, Mariano; Gunther, Richard P. and Montero, José Ramön (2002). Anti-Party Sentiments in Southern Europe. In Richard P. Gunther, José Ramón Montero, and Juan J. Linz (Eds.), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. United Nations Development Programme (2003). Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
98. Valenzuela, J. Samuel (1997). The Origins and Transformations of the Chilean Party System. In Fernando J. Devoto and Torcuato S. Di Tella (Eds.), Political Culture, Social Movements and Democratic Transitions in South America in the XXth Century (pp. 47-99). Milan: Feltrinelli.
99. Van Cott, Donna Lee (2000). Party System Development and Indigenous Populations in Latin America: The Bolivian Case. Party Politics, 6(2), 155-174.
100. Wallis, Darren (2003). Democratizing a Hegemonic Regime: From Institutionalized Party to Institutionalized Party System in Mexico? Democratisation, 10(3): 15-38.
101. Weffort, Francisco (1978). O Populisme na Politico Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
102. Westholm, Anders (1997). Distance Versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 865-883.
103. Weyland, Kurt (1999). Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379-401.
104. White, Stephen; Rose, Richard and McAllister, Ian (1997). How Russia Votes. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.