Changes in nicotine intake and cigarette use over time in two nationally representative cross-sectional samples of smokers

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 164, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 750-759

  O'Connor, Richard J ^a   Giovino, Gary A ^a   Kozlowski, Lynn T ^b   Shiffman, Saul ^c,d   Hyland, Andrew ^a   Bernert, John T ^e   Caraballo, Ralph S ^f   Cummings, K Michael ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d PINNEY ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^f NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Nicotine; Nutrition surveys; Smoking; Tobacco use disorder

Indexed keywords

COTININE; NICOTINE; TOBACCO SMOKE;

SMOKING; SURVEY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD LEVEL; CIGARETTE SMOKING; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SELF REPORT; TOBACCO; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY MASS INDEX; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; NICOTINE; NUTRITION SURVEYS; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 33749456217     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj263     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nicotine addiction. A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1988.
2. Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine addiction in Britain: a report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. London, United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians, 2000.
3. Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction-the implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:123-5.
4. Chaiton MO, Collishaw NE, Callard AJ. Smoker preference for "elastic cigarettes" in the Canadian cigarette market. Chronic Dis Can 2005;26:20-4.
5. Kozlowski LT, Dreschel NA, Stellman SD, et al. An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system. Tob Control 2005;14:64-70.
6. Kozlowski LT, O'Connor RJ, Sweeney CT. Cigarette design. In: Burns DM, Benowitz NL, eds. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 13). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2001:13-37. (NIH publication no. 02-5074).
7. Byrd GD, Davis RA, Caldwell WS, et al. A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers. Psychopharmacology 1998;139:291-9.
8. Kozlowski LT, O'Connor RJ. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control 2002;11(suppl):i40-i50.
9. Byrd GD, Robinson JH, Caldwell WS, et al. Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers. Psychopharmacology 1995;122:95-103.
10. Gori GB, Lynch CJ. Smoker intake from cigarettes in the 1-mg Federal Trade Commission tar class. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1983;3:110-20.
11. Gori GB, Lynch CJ. Analytical cigarette yields as predictors of smoke bioavailability. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1985;5:314-26.
12. Jarvis MJ, Boreham R, Primatesta P, et al. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:134-8.
13. Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Self-titration of nicotine: evidence from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Addiction 1993;88:821-30.
14. Ueda K, Kawachi I, Nakamura M, et al. Cigarette nicotine yields and nicotine intake among Japanese male workers. Tob Control 2002;11:55-60.
15. Benowitz NL, Jacob P III, Bernert JT, et al. Carcinogen exposure during short-term switching from regular to "light" cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1376-83.
16. Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Carmella SG, et al. Similar uptake of lung carcinogens by smokers of regular, light, and ultralight cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:693-8.
17. Harris JE. Incomplete compensation does not imply reduced harm: yields of 40 smoke toxicants per milligram nicotine in regular filter versus low-tar cigarettes in the 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:797-807.
18. Hyland A, Cummings KM. Changes in measures of nicotine dependence using cross-sectional and longitudinal data from COMMIT. In: Marcus SE, ed. Those who continue to smoke: is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 15). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003:61-70. (NIH publication no. 03-5270).
19. Burns DM, Major JM, Shanks TG. Changes in number of cigarettes smoked per day: cross-sectional and birth cohort analyses using NHIS. In: Marcus SE, ed. Those who continue to smoke: is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 15). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003:83-99. (NIH publication no. 03-5270).
20. Burns DM, Major JM, Anderson CM, et al. Changes in cross-sectional measures of cessation, numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, and time to first cigarette-California and national data. In: Marcus SE, ed. Those who continue to smoke: is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 15). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003:101-25. (NIH publication no. 03-5270).
21. Celebucki CC, Brawarsky P. Hardening of the target: evidence from Massachusetts. In: Marcus SE, ed. Those who continue to smoke: is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 15). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003:127-45. (NIH publication no. 03-5270).
22. Giovino GA. Epidemiology of tobacco use in the United States. Oncogene 2002;21:7326-40.
23. Hassmiller KM, Warner KE, Mendez D, et al. Nondaily smokers: who are they? Am J Public Health 2003;93:1321-7.
24. Wortley PM, Husten CG, Trosclair A, et al. Nondaily smokers: a descriptive analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:755-9.
25. Trosclair A, Caraballo R, Malarcher A, et al. Cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005;54:509-13.
26. Husten C, Jackson K, Lee C. Cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;53:427-31.
27. Porter S, Jackson K, Trosclair A, et al. Prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and changes in prevalence of current and some day smoking-United States, 1996-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;52:303-4, 306-7.
28. Evans WN, Farrelly MC. The compensating behavior of smokers: taxes, tar, and nicotine. Rand J Econ 1998;29:578-95.
29. Cummings KM. Programs and policies to discourage the use of tobacco products. Oncogene 2002;21:7349-64.
30. Hughes JR. The case for hardening of the target. In: Marcus SE, ed. Those who continue to smoke: is achieving abstinence harder and do we need to change our interventions? (Smoking and tobacco control monograph no. 15). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2003:33-9. (NIH publication no. 03-5270).
31. Benowitz NL, Jacob P. Nicotine and cotinine elimination pharmacokinetics in smokers and nonsmokers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993;53:316-23.
32. Bernert JT Jr, Turner WE, Pirkle JL, et al. Development and validation of sensitive method for determination of serum cotinine in smokers and nonsmokers by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 1997;43:2281-91.
33. Benowitz NL, Jacob P III. Metabolism of nicotine to cotinine studied by a dual stable isotope method. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994;56:483-93.
34. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES III data files. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1996. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/nh3data.htm).
35. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 1999-2000. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2005. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/NHANES99_00.htm).
36. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 2001-2002. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2005. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/NHANES01-02.htm).
37. Pirkle JL, Flegan KM, Bernert J, et al. Exposure of the U.S. population to environmental tobacco smoke. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. JAMA 1996;275:1233-40.
38. Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in serum cotinine levels of cigarette smokers: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. JAMA 1998;280:135-9.
39. Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF, et al. Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinine levels among persons aged 17 years or older: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:807-14.
40. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: the evidence report. (NIH publication no. 98-4083). Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1998. (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/ obesity/ob_gdlns.pdf).
41. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Analytic and reporting guidelines: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES III (1988-94). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1996. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/ nhanes3/nh3gui.pdf).
42. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES analytic guidelines-June 2004 version. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2004. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ nhanes/nhanes_general_guidelines_june_04.pdf).
43. Caban AJ, Lee DJ, Fleming LE, et al. Obesity in U.S. workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 1986 to 2002. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1614-22.
44. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission cigarette report for 2003. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, 2005. (http://www.ftc.gov/ reports/cigarette05/050809cigrpt.pdf).
45. Mustonen TK, Spencer SM, Hoskinson RA Jr, et al. The influence of gender, race, and menthol content on tobacco exposure measures. Nicotine Tob Res 2005;7:581-90.
46. Pickett KE, Rathouz PJ, Kasza K, et al. Self-reported smoking, cotinine levels, and patterns of smoking in pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005;19:368-76.
47. Woodward M, Moohan M, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Self-reported smoking, cigarette yields and inhalation biochemistry related to the incidence of coronary heart disease: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. J Epidemiol Biostat 1999;4:285-95.
48. Kozlowski LT, Herman CP. The interaction of psychosocial and biological determinants of tobacco use: more on the boundary model. J Appl Soc Psychol 1984;14:244-56.
49. Warner KE, Burns DM. Hardening and the hard-core smoker: concepts, evidence, and implications. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:37-48.
50. Hughes JR, Brandon TH. A softer view of hardening. (Letter). Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:961-2.
51. Shiffman S, Gitchell J, Pinney JM, et al. Public health benefit of over-the-counter nicotine medications. Tob Control 1997;6:306-10.
52. Godtfredsen NS, Osler M, Vestbo J, et al. Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and incidence of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in Denmark 1976-1998: a pooled cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:412-16.
53. Prescott E, Scharling H, Osler M, et al. Importance of light smoking and inhalation habits on risk of myocardial infarction and all cause mortality. A 22 year follow up of 12 149 men and women in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:702-6.
54. Godtfredsen NS, Holst C, Prescott E, et al. Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and mortality: a 16-year follow-up of 19,732 men and women from the Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:994-1001.
55. Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Carmella SG, et al. Effects of reduced cigarette smoking on the uptake of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:107-15.
56. Benowitz NL, Jacob P III, Kozlowski L, et al. Influence of smoking fewer cigarettes on exposure to tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide exposure. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1310-13.
57. Hyland A, Levy D, Rezaishiraz H, et al. Reduction in amount smoked predicts future cessation. Psychol Addict Behav 2005;19:221-5.
58. Hughes JR, Carpenter MJ. The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update. Addiction 2005;100:1074-89.
59. Hughes JR. Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidence. Addiction 2000;95(suppl 1):S3-7.
60. Shiffman S, Waters A, Hickcox M. The Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale: a multidimensional measure of nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:327-48.
61. Shadel WG, Shiffman S, Niaura R, et al. Current models of nicotine dependence: what is known and what is needed to advance understanding of tobacco etiology among youth. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000;5(suppl 1):S9-22.