Dynamic consultation: Towards process and challenge

Educational Psychology in Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 47-62

  Hymer, Barry ^a   Michel, Deborah ^a   Todd, Liz ^b  

^a CUMBRIA COUNTY COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749453691     PISSN: 02667363     EISSN: 14695839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02667360120122813     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BLACK, P., and WlLLAM, D., 1998. Inside the Black Box: raising standards through classroom assessment, London: King's College School of Education.
2. BRANSFORD, J.D., DELCLOS, V.R., VYE, N.J., BURNS, M.S., and HASSELBRING, T.S., 1987. “ State of the art and future directions ”. In Dynamic Assessment----an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, Edited by: LIDZ, C.S., New York: Guilford.
3. BURDEN, R., 1996. “ Meaningful questions or meaningful answers: worthwhile assessment in a changing world ”. In Perspectives onLearning Difficulties: International Concerns and South African Realities, Edited by: ENGELBRECHT, P., KRLEGLER, S.M., and BOOYSEN, M.I., Pretoria: van Schaik.
4. CAPLAN, G., 1970. The Theory and Practice of Mental Health Consultation, New York: Basic Books.
5. CONOLEY, J.C., and CONOLEY, C.W., 1982. School Consultation: A Guide to Practice and Training, New York: Pergamon.
6. CUMBRIA COUNTY COUNCIL. 1997. Special Educational Needs Handbook, Carlisle: Cumbria Education Service.
7. DANIELS, H., 1992. “ Dynamic assessment. Pitfalls and prospects ”. In The Assessment of Special Educational Needs: international perspectives, Edited by: CLINE, T., London: Routledge.
8. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION. 1993. Draft Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs, London: HMSO.
9. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION. 1994. Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs, London: HMSO.
10. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 2000a. Revised SEN Code of Practice, London: HMSO.
11. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 2000b. Educational Psychology Services (Eng-land): Current Role, Good Practice and Future Directions-Report of the Working Group, London: HMSO.
12. DONALDSON, M., 1978. Children's Minds, London: Fontana.
13. DRAPER, R., 1997. Workshop, London: Institute for Family Therapy.
14. ELLIOTT, J, LAUCHLAN, F., and STRPNGER, P., 1996. Dynamic Assessment and its potential for educational psychologists, part 1: theory and practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(3): 152–160.
15. FEUERSTEPN, R., and FEUERSTEIN, S., 1991. “ Mediated learning experience: a theoretical review ”. In Mediated Learning Experiences (MLE) Theoretical, Psychosocial and Learning Implications, Edited by: FEUERSTEIN, R., KLEIN, P.S., and TANNENBAUM, A.J., Freund: London.
16. FEUERSTEIN, R., RAND, J., and HOFFMAN, M., 1979. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
17. FEUERSTEIN, R., RAND, Y., and RYNDERS, J.E., 1988. The Learning Potential Assessment Device (Chapter 11). Don't Accept Me as I Am: helping retarded people to excel, New York: Plenum Press.
18. FlSHER, R., 1998. Teaching Thinking-philosophical enquiry in the classroom, London: Cassell.
19. FUCHS, D., FUCHS, L., DULAN, J., ROBERTS, H., and FERNSTROM, P., 1992. Where is the research on consultation effectiveness?. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3(2): 151–174.
20. GlLLHAM, B., ed. 1978. Reconstructing Educational Psychology, London: Groom Helm.
21. GRIGORENKO, E.L., and KORNILOVA, T.V., 1997. “ The resolution of the nature-nurture controversy by Russian psychology: culturally biased or culturally specific? ”. In Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, Edited by: STERNBERG, R.J., and GRIGORENKO, E.L., Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
22. HART, S., 2000. Thinking Through Teaching, London: David Fulton.
23. HOBBS, C., TAYLOR, J., and TODD, L., 2000. Consulting with children and young people. Enabling educational psychologists to work collaboratively with children and young people. Educa-tional and Child Psychology, 14(4): 107–115.
24. HOLZMAN, L., 1995. Creating developmental learning environments: a Vygotskian practice. School Psychology International, 16(2): 199–212.
25. KARPOV, Y.V., and HAYWOOD, H.C., 1998. Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53(1): 27–36.
26. LlDZ, C.S., 1987. “ Historical perspectives ”. In Dynamic Assessment ---- an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, Edited by: LlDZ, C.S., New York: Guilford.
27. LUNT, I., 1993. “ The practice of assessment ”. In Charting the Agenda. Educational activity after Vygotsky, Edited by: DANIELS, H., London: Routledge.
28. MACHARDY, L., CARMICHAEL, H., and PROCTOR, J., 1996. School consultation: it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing. An Evaluative Study of a Consultation Model of Service Delivery, Aberdeen: Aberdeen City Council Psychological Service.
29. MAINES, B., 1999. Re: assessment/ghettoes/future etc. EPNET Mailbase posting, 31 January 1999
30. MEADOWS, S., 1998. I have a dream. Educational and Child Psychology, 15(2): 21
31. ROGOFF, B., 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. SEWELL, T.E., 1987. “ Dynamic Assessment as a non-discriminatory procedure ”. In Dynamic Assessment----an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, Edited by: LlDZ, C.S., New York: Guilford.
33. SHARRON, H., and COULTER, M., 1996. Changing Children's Minds-Feuerstein's revolution in the teaching of intelligence, Birmingham: Imaginative Minds.
34. STRINGER, P.H., STOW, L., HIBBERT, K., POWELL, J., and Louw, E., 1992. Establishing staff consul-tation groups in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 8(2): 87–96.
35. STRINGER, P., ELLIOTT, J, and LAUCHLAN, F., 1997. Dynamic Assessment and its potential for educational psychologists, part 2: the zone of next development?. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4): 234–239.
36. TURNER, S., ROBBINS, H., and DORAN, C., 1996. Developing a model of consultancy practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(2): 86–93.
37. VYGOTSKY, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. WAGNER, P., 2000. Consultation: developing a comprehensive approach to service delivery. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(1): 9–18.
39. WAGNER, P., 2001. Consultation: a solution-focused approach. Solutions in Schools. Creative applications of solution focused brief thinking with young people and adults, London: Brief Therapy Press.
40. WATKINS, C., 2000. Introduction to the articles on consultation. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(1): 5–8.
41. WOOD, R., 1990. “ The agenda for educational measurement ”. In Assessment Debates, Edited by: HORTON, T., London: Hodder & Stoughton.
42. WOOD, D., BRUNER, J.S., and Ross, G., 1976. The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 17: 89–100.
43. ZOZULIN, A., 1990. Vygotsky's Psychology, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.