Does articulating study casts make a difference to treatment planning?

Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-49

  Ellis, P E ^a   Benson, P E ^a  

^a CHARLES CLIFFORD DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centric relation; Orthodontics; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 19244383911     PISSN: 14653125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ortho/30.1.45     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cordray FE. Centric relation treatment and articulator mountings in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1996;66:153-158.
2. Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the Orthodontist. Part III. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:174-179, 182-198.
3. Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:32-40, 44-51.
4. Roth RH, Rolfs DA. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. Part II. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:100-123.
5. Williamson EH, Caves SA, Edenfield RJ, Morse PK. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation. Am J Orthod 1978;74:672-677. (Pubitemid 9077665)
6. van Blarcom CW. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, 6th edn. (Supplement) J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:43-104.
7. Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:212-219.
8. Ribarevski R, Vig P, Vig KD, Weyant R, O'Brien K. Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:77-80. (Pubitemid 126421985)
9. Lee R, MacFarlane T, O'Brien K. Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2:79-84.
10. Wood DP, Floreani KJ, Galil KA, Teteruck WR. The effect of incisal bite force on condylar seating. Angle Orthod 1994;64:53-61.
11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
12. Ingervall B, Helkimo M, Carlsson GE. Recording of the retruded position of the mandible with application of varying external pressure to the lower jaw in man. Arch Oral Biol 1971;16:1165-1171.
13. Helkimo M, Ingervall B, Carlsson GE. Comparison of different methods in active and passive recording of the retruded position of the mandible. Scand J Dent Res, 1973;81:265-271.
14. Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B, Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:152-157.
15. Assif D, Himel R, Grajower Y. A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:672-676.
16. Simon RL, Nicholls JI. Variability of passively recorded centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:21-26.
17. Williamson EH, Steinke RM, Morse PK, Swift TR. Centric relation: a comparison of muscle-determined position and operator guidance. Am J Orthod 1980;77:133-145.
18. Utt TW, Meyers CE, Jr., Wierzba TF, Hondrum SO. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:298-308.
19. Rinchuse DJ. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar change between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1995;107:319-328.
20. Roth RH. Occlusion and condylar position. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1995;107:315-318.
21. Clark JR, Hutchinson I, Sandy JR. Functional occlusion: II. The role of articulators in orthodontics. J Orthod 2001;28:173-177.