Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.08.013);Variability of Force Magnitude and Force Duration in Manual and Instrument-Based Manipulation Techniques

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 611-618

  Kawchuk, Gregory N ^a   Prasad, Narasimha G ^a   McLeod, Randall C ^b   Liddle, Tasha ^a   Li, Tianye ^a   Zhu, Qiaohao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Stony Plain ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Instrument; Manipulation, Spinal; Reproducibility of Results

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FORCE; INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MATERIALS TESTING; MUSCLE FORCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SENSOR;

EID: 33749438251     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.014     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. International Chiropractic Association, Recommended clinical protocols and guidelines for the practice of chiropractic (1992), International Chiropractic Association, Arlington
2. Haldeman S., Chapman-Smith D., and Peterson D. Guidelines for chiropractic quality assurance and practice parameters. Proceedings of the Mercy Center Consensus Conference (1992), Aspen, Gaithersburg
3. In: Henderson D., Chapman-Smith D., Mior S., and Vernon H. (Eds). Clinical guidelines for chiropractic practice in Canada (1994), Canadian Chiropractic Association, Toronto (ON)
4. Assendelft W., Morton S., Yu E., Suttorp M., and Shekelle P. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) CD000447
5. Astin J., and Ernst E. The effectiveness of spinal manipulation for the treatment of headache disorders: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Cephalalgia 22 (2002) 617-623
6. Bronfort G., Haas M., Evans R., and Bouter L. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 4 (2004) 335-356
7. Bronfort G., Nilsson N., Haas M., Evans R., Goldsmith C., Assendelft W., et al. Non-invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) CD001878
8. Gross A., Hoving J., Haines T., Goldsmith C., Kay T., Aker P., et al. Cervical overview group. Manipulation and mobilisation for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) CD004249
9. Brennan G., Fritz J., Hunter S., Thackeray A., Delitto A., and Erhard R. Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute "nonspecific" low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31 (2006) 623-631
10. Childs J., Fritz J., Flynn T., Irrgang J., Johnson K., Majkowski G., et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 920-928
11. Harms M., and Bader D. Variability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 12 (1997) 393-399
12. Rogers C., and Triano J. Biomechanical measure validation for spinal manipulation in clinical settings. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 (2003) 539-548
13. Kawchuk G., Herzog W., and Hasler E. Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15 (1992) 275-278
14. Perle S., and Kawchuk G. Pressures generated during spinal manipulation and their association with hand anatomy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) e1-e7
15. Bisbinas I., Belthur M., Said H., Green M., and Learmonth D. Accuracy of needle placement in ACJ injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2006) 1-4
16. Boon J., Abrahams P., Meiring J., and Welch T. Lumbar puncture: anatomical review of a clinical skill. Clin Anat 17 (2004) 544-553
17. Chen L., Tang J., White P., Sloninsky A., Wender R., Naruse R., et al. The effect of location of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative opioid analgesic requirement: acupoint versus nonacupoint stimulation. Anesth Analg 87 (1998) 1129-1134
18. Edwards P. Promoting correct site surgery: a national approach. Br J Perioper Nurs 16 (2006) 80-86
19. Franco C. Posterior approach to the sciatic nerve in adults: is Euclidean geometry still necessary?. Anesthesiology 98 (2003) 723-728
20. Wiklund C., Romand J., Suter P., and Bendjelid K. Misplacement of central vein catheters in patients with hemothorax: a new approach to resolve the problem. J Trauma 59 (2005) 1029-1031
21. Lee S., Yang D., Choi M., and Kim C. Development of respiratory motion reduction device system (RMRDs) for radiotherapy in moving tumors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34 (2004) 686-691
22. Jekelis A. Increased instrument intelligence-can it reduce laboratory error?. Biomed Instrum Technol 39 (2005) 232-236
23. Guchelaar H., and Kalmeijer M. The potential role of computerisation and information technology in improving prescribing in hospitals. Pharm World Sci 25 (2003) 83-87
24. Croswell R., Dilley D., Lucas W., and Vann Jr. W. A comparison of conventional versus electronic monitoring of sedated pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent 17 (1995) 332-339
25. Christensen M., Kerkhoff D., and Kollasch M. Job analysis of chiropractic (2000), National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Greeley (Colo)
26. Fuhr A., and Smith D. Accuracy of piezoelectric accelerometers measuring displacement of a spinal adjusting instrument. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 9 (1986) 15-21
27. Herzog W., Kats M., and Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine 26 (2001) 2105-2110
28. Wood J., and Adams A. Forces used in selected chiropractic adjustments of the low back: a preliminary study. Res Forum 1 (1984) 16-23
29. Descarreaux M., Dugas C., Lalanne K., Vincelette M., and Normand M. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters. Spine J 6 (2006) 138-145
30. Enebo B., and Sherwood D. Experience and practice organization in learning a simulated high-velocity low-amplitude task. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) 33-43
31. Forand D., Drover J., Suleman Z., Symons B., and Herzog W. The forces applied by female and male chiropractors during thoracic spinal manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 49-56
32. Chiradejnant A., Latimer J., and Maher C. Forces applied during manual therapy to patients with low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25 (2002) 362-369
33. Kawchuk G., and Herzog W. Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 16 (1993) 573-577
34. Cohen E., Triano J., McGregor M., and Papakyriakou M. Biomechanical performance of spinal manipulation therapy by newly trained vs. practicing providers: does experience transfer to unfamiliar procedures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 347-352
35. Colloca C., Keller T., Black P., Normand M., Harrison D., and Harrison D. Comparison of mechanical force of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instruments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) 414-422
36. Fuhr A., and Menke J. Status of activator methods chiropractic technique, theory, and practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) e1-e20
37. Neuromechanical Innovations, Impulse [homepage on the Internet]. Phoenix: NeuroMechanical Innovations; c 2006 [cited April 18, 2006]. Impulse; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.neuromechanical.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=50.
38. Chiropractic Biophysics Online [homepage on the Internet]. JMPT publications: impulse fair best. Phoenix: Clinical Biomechanics of Posture; c2004-2006 [updated 2006 March 21; cited 2006 April 18]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.idealspine.com/pages/ajcc_october_2005_impulse_fairs_best_among_adjusting_instruments.htm.
39. The Integrator [homepage on the Internet]. The torque release technique. Miami Beach: Holder Research Institute; c2001-2006 [cited 2006 April 18]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.torquerelease.com/overview.htm.