Body inversion effect without body sense: Insights from deafferentation

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 44, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 2950-2958

  Bosbach, Simone ^a   Knoblich, Guenther ^b   Reed, Catherine L ^c   Cole, Jonathan ^d   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^d BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body inversion effect; Body schema; Configural processing; Deafferentation; Embodiment; Mental simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEAFFERENTATION; FACE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TOUCH; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN BODY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33749430253     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Astafiev S.V., Stanely C.M., Shulman G.I., and Corbetta M. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nature Neuroscience 7 5 (2004) 542-548
2. Bavelas J.B., Black A., Lemery C.R., and Mullett J. I show how you feel: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 322-329
3. In: Bermúdez J.L., Marcel A., and Eilan N. (Eds). The body and the self (1998), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Bernieri F. Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 12 (1988) 120-138
5. Blakemore S.-J., Frith C.D., and Wolpert D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensations. Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 635-640
6. Blakemore S.-J., Frith C.D., and Wolpert D. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 237-242
7. Boker S.M., and Rotondo J.L. Symmetry building and symmetry breaking in synchronized movement. In: Stamenov M.I., and Gallese V. (Eds). Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language (2002), Benjamins, Philadelphia 163-171
8. Bosbach S., Cole J., Prinz W., Paillard J., and Knoblich G. Understanding another's expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience 8 10 (2005) 1295-1297
9. Cole J. Pride and a daily marathon (1995), MIT Press, Boston
10. Cole J., and Paillard J. Living without touch and peripheral information about body. Position and movement: Studies with deafferented subjects. In: Bermudez J.L., Marcel A., and Eilan N. (Eds). The body and the self (1995), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 255-266
11. Cole J.D., and Sedgwick E.M. The perception of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. Journal of Physiology 449 (1992) 503-515
12. Crawford J.R., and Garthwaite P.H. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia 40 (2002) 1196-1208
13. Crawford J.R., and Howell D.C. Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 12 (1998) 482-486
14. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 107-117
15. Downing P.E., Jihang Y., Shuman M., and Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for processing of the human body. Science 293 (2001) 2470-2473
16. Farah M.J., Tanaka J.W., and Drain H.M. What causes the face inversion effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 3 (1995) 628-634
17. Fischer M.H. Action simulation for others is not constrained by one's own postures. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 28-34
18. Gallese V. The "shared manifold" hypothesis: From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 5-7 (2001) 33-50
19. Gallese V. Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2005) 23-48
20. Gallese V., and Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1998) 493-501
21. Head H., and Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34 (1911) 102-254
22. Keysers C., Wicker B., Gazzola V., Anton J.-L., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42 (2004) 246-335
23. In: Knoblich G., Thornton I., Grosjean M., and Shiffrar M. (Eds). Human body perception from the inside out (2005), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
24. Marr D. Vision (1982), Freeman, New York
25. Pavlova M., and Sokolov A. Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 889-899
26. Reed C.L. What is the body schema?. In: Prinz W., and Meltzhoff A. (Eds). The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 233-243
27. Reed C.L., and Farah M.J. The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 334-343
28. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., and McGoldrick J.E. Not just posturing: Configural processing of the human body. In: Knoblich G., Thornton I., Grosjean M., and Shiffrar M. (Eds). Perception of the human body (2005), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
29. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Bozova S., and Tanaka J. The body inversion effect. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 302-308
30. Reed, C. L., Nyberg, A., & Grubb, J., 2006. The embodiment of perceptual expertise and configural processing, submitted for publication.
31. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Grubb J.D., and McGoldrick J.E. Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 73-87
32. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., and Fogassi L. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research 3 (1996) 131-141
33. Shiffrar M., and Freyd J.J. Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 257-264
34. Shiffrar M., and Freyd J.J. Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science 4 (1993) 379-384
35. Shockley K., Santana M.-V., and Fowler C.A. Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 326-332
36. Stekelenburg J.J., and de Gelder B. The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study of the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport 15 5 (2004) 777-780
37. Stenneken P., Aschersleben G., Cole J., and Prinz W. Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects. Psychological Research 66 1 (2002) 40-49
38. Sumi S. Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception 13 (1984) 283-286
39. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A (1993) 225-245
40. Tanaka J.W., and Gauthier I. Expertise in object and face recognition. In: Goldstone R.L., Schyns P.G., and Medin D.L. (Eds). Psychology of learning and motivation: Perceptual mechanisms of learning Vol. 36 (1997), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 83-125
41. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (in press). Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology.
42. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., and Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 96 3 (2005) 215-231
43. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: A review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 79 (1988) 471-491
44. Wallbott H.G. Recognition of emotion from facial expression via imitation? Some indirect evidence for an old theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 30 (1991) 207-219
45. Wilson M. Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin 127 (2001) 543-553
46. Wilson M., and Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005) 460-473
47. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997) 209-216
48. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 141-145