MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: A systematic review

BMC Medical Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Kaltenthaler, Eva C ^a   Walters, Stephen J ^a   Chilcott, Jim B ^a   Blakeborough, Anthony ^b   Vergel, Yolanda Bravo ^c   Thomas, Steven M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BILE DUCT DILATATION; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CLAUSTROPHOBIA; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; GASTROINTESTINAL PAIN; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 33749417890     PISSN: 14712342     EISSN: 14712342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-6-9     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. RCGP, OPCS, DHSS: Morbidity Statistics from General Practice Fourth national study 1991-1992 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, editor. Series MB5 no.3. London, HMSO; 1995.
2. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, Chung JJ, Song SY, Kim KS, Yoo, HS, Lee JT, Kim KW: MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology 2002, 224:410-416.
3. Sheridan MB: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should no longer be used as a diagnostic test: the case in favour. Digestive & Liver Disease 2002, 34:370-374.
4. Coakley FV, Qayyum A: Magnetic resonancecholangiopancreatography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002, 55(7 Suppl):S2-12.
5. Kaltenthaler E, Bravo Vergel Y, Chilcott J, Thomas S, Blakeborough A, Walters SJ, Bouchier H: A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Health Technology Assessment 2004, 8(1101-102) [http://www.ncchta.org/ProjectData/ 3_project_record_published.asp?Pjtld=1355].
6. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J: The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3(1):25. Nov 10 2003
7. Deeks JJ: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in context 2nd edition. Edited by: Eggers M Davey, Smith G, Altman D. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001:248-82.
8. Littenberg B, Moses LE: Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytical method. Med Decision Making 1993, 13:313-321.
9. Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M, Breer H, Schilling D, Riemann JF: A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998, 43(5):680-683.
10. Alcaraz MJ, De la Morena EJ, Polo A, Ramos A, De la Cal MA, Gonzalez MA: A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas 2000, 92(7):427-438.
11. Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, Henry JJ, LaRusso NF, Petersen BT, Lindor KD: Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Journal of Hepatology 2000, 33(4):520-527.
12. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT: MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. American Journal of Roentgenology 1995, 165(2):295-300.
13. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, Heras I, Cabriada JL, Bernal A, Orive V, Capelastegi A: Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002, 77(5):422-428.
14. Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW, Lee DW, Chung SS, Sung JJ, Cheung HS, Li AKC, Metreweli C: Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996, 200(1):85-89.
15. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F: Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Archives of Surgery 2000, 135(2):148-152.
16. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN: Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery 1998, 85(10):1364-1366.
17. Feldman DR, Kulling DP, Kay CL; Cole DJ, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Tarnasky PR, Cotton PB, Baron PL: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Annals of Surgical Oncology 1997, 4(8):634-638.
18. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN: Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995, 197(1):109-115.
19. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R: Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1997, 29(3):182-187.
20. Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sackmann M, Thoeni RF, Schurig J, Holl J, Weinzierl M, Heimberger T, Paumgartner G, Reiser M: Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1998, 206(3):657-664.
21. Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, Cessot F, Desport JC, Le Sidaner A, Pillegand B: American Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Journal of Gastroenterology 2001, 96(8):2354-2359.
22. Lee MG, Lee HJ, Kim MH, Kang EM, Kim YH, Lee SG, Kim PN, Ha HK, Auh YH: Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997, 202(3):663-669.
23. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Mazzocchi P, Fiocca F, Lezoche E, Passariello R, Speranza V: Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. American Journal of Surgery 1997, 174(1):33-38.
24. Lomas DJ, Bearcroft PW, Gimson AE: MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP. European Radiology 1999, 9(7):1411-1417.
25. Macaulay SE, Schulte SJ, Sekijima JH, Obregon RG, Simon HE, Rohrmann CAJ, Freeny PC, Schmiedl UP: Evaluation of a non-breathhold MR cholangiography technique. Radiology 1995, 196:1-232.
26. Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Magnuson T: Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. American Journal of Roentgenology 1996, 167:1441-1445.
27. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN, Wang L, Tafazoli F: Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998, 209(2):435-442.
28. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R: Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996, 110(2):589-597.
29. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, Medina S: Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000, 215(3):737-745.
30. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Munera F, Velez SM, Valencia J, Ramirez N: Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. American Journal of Roentgenology 2000, 175(4):1127-1134.
31. Stiris MG, Tennoe B, Aadland E, Lunde OC: MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiologica 2000, 41(3):269-272.
32. Sugiyama M, Baba M, Atomi Y, Hanaoka H, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J: Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surgery 1998, 123(4):391-397.
33. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV: Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. GASTROINTEST ENDOSC 2002, 55(1):17-22.
34. Textor HJ, Flacke S, Pauleit D, Keller E, Neubrand M, Terjung B, Gieseke J, Scheurlen C, Sauerbruch T, Schild HH: Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2002, 34(12):984-990.
35. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ: Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clinical Radiology 2000, 55(1):25-35.
36. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G: Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999, 44(1):118-122.
37. Menon K, Barkun AN, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta SN, Reinhold C, Bret PM: Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2001, 96(9):2646-2650.
38. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN: Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003, 139(7):547-557.
39. Misra SP, Dwivedi M: Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: diagnosis, management and prevention. National Medical Journal of India 2002, 15(1):27-31.
40. Cotton PB, Jowell PS, Baillie J: Spectrum of complications after diagnostic ERCP and effects of comorbidities [abstract]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1994, 40:18.
41. Baillie J: Predicting and preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Current Gastroenterology Reports 2002, 4:112-119.
42. Bravo Vergel Y, Chilcott J, Kaltenthaler E, Walters SJ, Blakeborough A, Thomas S: Economic evaluation of MR cholangiopancreatography compared to diagnostic ERCP for the investigation of biliary tree obstruction. International Journal of Surgery 2006, 4(1):12-19.
43. Altman DG: Some common problems in medical research. In Practical Statistics for Medical Research Volume Chapter 14. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991:418.