|
Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 370-374
|
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should no longer be used as a diagnostic test: The case in favour
|
Author keywords
Biliary neoplasm; Choledocholithiasis; Computed tomography; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatic neoplasm
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BILIARY TRACT CANCER;
BILIARY TRACT DISEASE;
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS;
COMMON BILE DUCT STONE;
COMPLICATION;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
HUMAN;
IMAGING SYSTEM;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL EXPERT;
NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT;
PANCREAS CANCER;
PANCREAS DISEASE;
PREDICTION;
SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
BILE DUCT DISEASE;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
GALLSTONE;
PANCREAS TUMOR;
RADIOGRAPHY;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
BILE DUCT DISEASES;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
GALLSTONES;
HUMANS;
PANCREATIC DISEASES;
PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0035986232
PISSN: 15908658
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80132-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (58)
|