Web-based versus face-to-face learning of diabetes management: The results of a comparative trial of educational methods

Family Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 647-652

  Wiecha, John M ^a,d   Chetty, V K ^a   Pollard, Timothy ^c   Shaw, Peter F ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Greater Lawrence Community Health Center   (United States)

^d BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT CARE PLANNING;

CURRICULUM; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET;

EID: 33749379026     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: 07423225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Schroeder SA. Expanding the site of clinical education: moving beyond the hospital walls. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3(2 Suppl):S5-S14.
2. O'Neil EH, and the Pew Health Professions Commission. Recreating health professional practice for a new century. San Francisco: Pew Health Professions Commission, 1998.
3. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Thirteenth report of the Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME): physician education for a changing health care environment. Rockville, Md: COGME, March 1999.
4. Contemporary issues in medicine - medical informatics and population health: report II of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999;74(2):130-41.
5. National Center for Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2004. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 2006.
6. Harris MI, Hadden WC, Knowler WC, Bennett PH. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance and plasma glucose levels in US population aged 20-74 years. Diabetes 1987;36(4):523-34.
7. Harris MI. Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues. Diabetes Care 1993;16(4):642-52.
8. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21(4): 518-24.
9. King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults. WHO Ad Hoc Diabetes Reporting Group. Diabetes Care 1993;16(1):157-77.
10. Wiecha JM, Gramling R, Joachim P, Vanderschmidt H. Collaborative e-learning using streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of medical interviewing: a case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003;5(2):e13.
11. Wiecha JM, Barrie N. Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME. Acad Med 2002;77(9):928-9.
12. Wiecha JM, Vanderschmidt H, Schilling K. HEAL: an instructional design model applied to an online clerkship in family medicine. Acad Med 2002;77(9):925-6.
13. Stagnaro-Green A. Applying adult learning principles to medical education in the United States. Med Teach 2004;26(1):79-85.
14. Novack DH, Epstein RM, Paulsen RH. Toward creating physician-healers: fostering medical students' self-awareness, personal growth, and well-being. Acad Med 1999;74(5):516-20.
15. Davis BG. Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
16. Pugnaire MP, Leong SL, Quirk ME, Mazor K, Gray JM. The standardized family: an innovation in primary care education at the University of Massachusetts. Acad Med 1999; 74(1 Suppl):S90-S97.
17. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28(4):990.
18. Collison G, Elbaum B, Haavind S, Tinker R. Facilitating online learning: effective strategies for moderators. Madison, Wis: Atwood, 2000.
19. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of three methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283(13):1715-22.
20. Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, et al. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294(9):1043-51.
21. Cook DA, Dupras DM, Thompson WG, Pankratz VS. Web-based learning in residents' continuity clinics: a randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med 2005;80(1):90-7.
22. Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med 2001;76:1060-4.
23. Battles JB, Carpenter JL, McIntire DD, Wagner JM. Analyzing and adjusting for variables in a large-scale standardized patient examination. Acad Med 1994;69(5):370-6.
24. Mehta MP, Sinha P, Kanwar K, Inman A, Albanese M, Fahl W. Evaluation of Internet-based oncologic teaching for medical students. J Cancer Educ 1998;13(4):197-202.
25. Lynch TG, Woelfl NN, Steele DJ, Hanssen CS. Learning style influences student examination performance. Am J Surg 1998;176(1):62-6.
26. Cook DA. Learning and cognitive styles in Web-based learning: theory, evidence, and application. Acad Med 2005;80(3):266-78.
27. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002;77(10 Suppl):S86-S93.
28. Imel S. Trends and issues alerts: distance education. Eric Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Ohio State University, 1996.
29. Imel S. Distance education: myths and realities. Eric Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Ohio State University, 1998.
30. Sherry L. Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1996;1(4):337-65.
31. Wiecha JM, Pollard T. The interdisciplinary eHealth team: chronic care for the future. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004;6(3):e22.