A functional analysis of the 2002 Korean presidential debates

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 115-132

  Lee, Cheolhan ^a   Benoit, William L ^b  

^a Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749367370     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292980500118193     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Benoit, W. L., 1995. Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies, Albany: State University of New York Press.
2. Benoit, W. L., 1999. Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996, Westport, CT: Praeger.
3. Benoit, W. L., 2001. The functional approach to presidential television spots: Acclaiming, attacking, and defending 1952–2000. Communication Studies, 52: 109–126.
4. Benoit, W. L., Blaney, J. R., and Pier, P. M., 1998. Campaign ‘96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, defending discourse, Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Benoit, W. L., and Brazeal, L. M., 2002. A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush–Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38: 219–233.
6. Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., and Verser, R. M., 2003. A meta-analysis of the effects of watching U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70: 335–350.
7. Benoit, W. L., and Harthcock, A., 1999. Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 66: 341–357.
8. Benoit, W. L., McHale, J. P., Hansen, G. J., Pier, P. M., and McGuire, J. P., 2003. Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of presidential campaign discourse, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9. Benoit, W. L., Pier, P. M., Brazeal, L. M., Klyukovski, A., and Airne, D., 2002. The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries, Westport, CT: Praeger.
10. Benoit, W. L., and Wells, W. T., 1996. Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11. Benoit, W. L., Wells, W. T., Pier, P. M., and Blaney, J. R., 1999. Acclaiming, attacking, and defending in nomination convention acceptance addresses, 1960–1996. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 85: 247–267.
12. Berelson, B., 1952. Content analysis for social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
13. Carlin, D. P., 1994. “ A rational for focus group study ”. In The 1992 presidential debates in focus, Edited by: Carlin, D. B., and McKinney, M. S., 3–19. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Choi, Y., (2002, December 8). Presidential debates. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.kinds.or.kr
15. Jamieson, K. H., 1987. “ Television, presidential campaigns, and debates ”. In Presidential debates 1988 and beyond, Edited by: Swerdlow, J. L., 27–33. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
16. Kim, K., (2002a, December 15). Lee, Roh poles apart on North Korea policy. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.kinds.or.kr
17. Kim, K., (2002b, December 18). Finally, the nation goes to polls. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.kinds.or.kr
18. Korean Press Foundation. (2003). Datongryung sunkuwa media [Presidential elections and media] (No. 2303.01). Seoul: Hanul.
19. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159–174.
20. Lee, C., and Benoit, W. L., 2004. A functional analysis of presidential television spots: A comparison of Korean and American ads. Communication Quarterly, 52: 68–79.
21. Lowe, A., 1996. Face saving in business relationships: A basic social process, Helsingfors: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
22. Pomper, G. M., 1975. Voters’ choice: Varieties of American electoral behavior, New York: Dodd, Mead.
23. Popkin, S. L., 1994. The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Racine Group. 2002. White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy: The Journal of the American Forensic Association, 38: 199–218.
25. Ryu, J., (2002a, November 17). Korea Times national. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.kinds.or.kr
26. Ryu, J., (2002b, December 2). Lee, Roh in TV debates tonight. Korea Times. Retrieved from the http://www.kinds.or.kr
27. Schtuz, A., 1995. Entertainer, experts, or public servants? Politicians’ self-presentation on television shows. Political Communication, 12: 211–222.
28. Song, J., 2003. 2002 Presidential television debates, Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Institute.
29. Steinberg, D. I., (2002, December 16). Korean politics and policies. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.kinds.or.kr
30. Wattenberg, M. P., 1990. The decline of American political parties, 1952–1988, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Wattenberg, M. P., 1991. The rise of candidate-centered politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Wells, W. T., (1999). An analysis of attacking, acclaiming, and defending strategies in the 1976, 1980, and 1984 debates. Unpublished dissertation, University of Missouri.
33. Yang, S., 2003. 16dae daetongryung sunkawa media. [The 16th presidential election and media], Seoul: Korean Press Foundation.