College in the information age: Gains associated with students' use of technology

Journal of Interactive Online Learning

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 143-155

  Strayhorn, Terrell L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749348653     PISSN: 15414914     EISSN: 15414914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ali, A., & Elfessi, A. (2004, Winter). Examining students performance and attitudes towards the use of information technology in a virtual and conventional setting. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3). Retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/2.3.5.pdf
2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bento, R., & Bento, A. (2000). Using the web to extend and support classroom learning. College Student Journal, 34(4), 603-608.
5. Cartwright, G. (1993). Do computers help students learn? EDUTECH Report, 9.
6. DeSousa, D. J., & King, P. M. (1992). Are White students really more involved in collegiate experiences than Black students? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 363-369.
7. Flowers, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Pierson, C. T. (1999). Information technology use and cognitive outcomes in the first year of college. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
8. Gatz, L., & Hirt, J. B. (2000). Academic and social integration in Cyberspace: How traditional aged, residential, first-year students use email. Review of Higher Education, 23, 299-318.
9. Gifford, L. J. (1998, November). Graduate students perceptions of time spent in taking a course by internet versus taking a course in a regular classroom. Paper presented at the annual Mid-South Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans.
10. Glaudieux, L., & Swail, S. (1999). The virtual university and educational opportunity: Issues of equity and access for the next generation. Washington, DC: College Board.
11. Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. In P. D. Umbach (Ed.), Survey research: Emerging Issues (pp. 73-89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Green, K. (1996). The coming ubiquity of information technology. Change, 28, 24-28.
13. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1998). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
14. Hofman, D. W. (2002). Internet-based distance education learning in higher education. TechDirections, 62(1), 28-32.
15. Institution for Higher Education Policy. (1999). Distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Karr, C. L., Week, B., Sunal, D. W., & Cook, T. M. (2003, Winter). Analysis of the effectiveness of online learning in a graduate engineering math course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(3). Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/1.3.3.pdf
17. Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., & Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.
18. Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2000). The effects of computer and information technology on student learning and other college experiences. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19. Kuh, G. D., Pace, C. R., & Vesper, N. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38, 435-454.
20. Kuh, G. D., & Vesper, N. (1999). Do computers enhance or detract from student learning? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
21. Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
22. Marttunen, M. (1997). Electronic mail as a pedagogical delivery system: An analysis of the learning of argumentation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 345-363.
23. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Education Digest, 2001, Table 207. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/ digest2001/tables/dt207.tsp
24. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation.
25. Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation.
26. Pace, C. R. (1990). The undergraduates: A report of their activities and progress in college in the 1980's. Los Angeles: University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation.
27. Pace, C. R., & Kuh, G. D. (1998). College student experiences questionnaire (4th ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
28. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
30. Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationships between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1-22.
31. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First and second generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 276-300.
32. Redding, T. R., & Rotzien, J. (2001). Comparative analysis of online learning vs. classroom learning. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 13(4), 3-12.
33. Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication: The new media in society. New York: The Free Press.
34. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
35. Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., McConnell, S., & Kogan, L. R. (2004, Fall). Taking it online-The effects of delivery medium and facilitator on student achievement in problem based learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2). Retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/3.2.3. pdf
36. Slate, J. R., Manuel, M., & Brinson Jr, K. H. (2002). The "Digital Divide": Hispanic college students' views of educational uses of the Internet. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 75.
37. Smeaton, A., & Keogh, G. (1999). An analysis of the use of virtual delivery on undergraduate lectures. Computers and Education, 32, 83-94.
38. Taraban, R., & Rynearson, K. (1998). Computer-based comprehension research in a content area. Journal of Developmental Education(21), 10.
39. Tjaden, V., & Martin, C. (1995). Learning effects of CAI on college students. Computers and Education, 24, 271-277.
40. Weller, H. (1997). What have we learned from eight y ears of research on computer-based science learning? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.