Academic and social integration in cyberspace: Students and e-mail

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 299-318

  Gatz, Lisa B ^a   Hirt, Joan B ^b  

^a VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350360     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American College Testing Program (1990). Student Opinion Survey. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
3. Caswell, S. A. (1988). E-Mail. Boston, Artech House.
4. DeLoughry, T. J. (1993, April 7.). Chemistry students ask more questions with e-mail. Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(31), p. A21.
5. Deloughry, T. J. (1996, November 22). Campus computer use is increasing, but not as fast as in previous year: Colleges are still trying to cope with influx of new technology users from 1995. Chronicle of Higher Education, 43(13), pp. A21-A22.
6. Farquhar, J. D., McGinty, B., & Kotcho, C. (1996). The internet as a tool for the social construction of knowledge. In Simonson, Hays, & Hall, pp. 211-217.
7. Hawley, C., Moore, J., Chuang, W., & Angeli, C. (1996). Electronic mail: An examination of high-end users. In Simonson, Hays, & Hall, pp. 264-269.
8. Holden, M., & Mitchell, W. (1993). The future of computer-mediated communication in higher education. EDUCOM Review, 28, 31-37.
9. Kurshan, B. (1990). Educational telecommunications: Connections for the classroom, part 1. Computing Teacher, 17, 30-31.
10. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2d ed.). London: Sage.
11. Pace, C. R. (1990). College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation.
12. Russell, A. L. (1996). Six stages for learning to use technology. In Simonson, Hays, & Hall, pp. 633-641.
13. Russell, R. V., & Stage, F. K. (1992). Triangulation: Intersection assessment and research methods. In F. K. Stage (Ed.), Diverse methods for research and assessment of college students. Alexandria, VA: American College Personnel Association.
14. Simonson, M. R., M. Hays, & S. Hall (Eds.). 18th Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 849)
15. Swartz, V. R., & Walters, T. L. (November, 1995). The U.S. mail versus e-mail: Understanding interpersonal communication through traditional pedagogical pathways. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 393 127)
16. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition research (2d ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
17. Trudell, L., Bruman, J., & Oliver, J. (1984). Options for electronic mail. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
18. Wilson, P. A. (1983). Introducing the electronic mailbox. Manchester, ENG: National Computing Centre Publications.
19. Wilson, B., Ryder, M. McCahan, J., & Sherry, L. (1996). Cultural assimilation of the internet: A case study. In Simonson, Hays, & Hall, pp. 810-820.
20. Winston, R. B., Miller, T. K., & Prince, J. S. (1987). Student Development Task and Lifestyle Inventory. Athens, GA: Student Development Associates.
21. Wishnietsky, D. H. (1991). Using electronic mail in an educational setting. (PDK Fastback Series No. 316). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
22. Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. In Simonson, Hays, & Hall, pp. 821-844.