Adequacy in the South African context: A concept analysis

Perspectives in Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 25-34

  Amsterdam, Christina ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749334734     PISSN: 02582236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Augenblick JG, Meyrs JL & Anderson AB 1997. Equity and adequacy in school funding. The Future of Children, 7(3), 63-78. Retrieved from: http://www.futureofchildren.org/information2826/information_show.htm?doc_id= 73377.
2. Berne R & Stiefel L 1984. The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological and empirical Dimensions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
4. Castro-Leal F (December, 1996). Poverty and inequality in the distribution of public education spending in South Africa. Poverty and Social Policy Department, Human Capital Development, World Bank.
5. Claremont School District v. Gregg, 635 A.2d 1375 (NH 1993).
6. Clune WH 1993. The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance. Tha World & I, 8(9), 389-405.
7. Crouch L 2004. The hard slog of implementation: South African reforms from early post-apartheid to the future. International Working Group on Education (IWGE), Washington: DC Retrieved from: http:/ /www/unesco.og/iiep/eng/ networks/iwge/docs/decentralisation/iwge9.doc.
8. Department of Education, Republic of South Africa 1995. White Paper on education and training. Notice 196 of 1995, 15 March. Pretoria: Government Printer.
9. Department of Education, Republic of South Africa 1996. South African Schools Act, 15 November 1996. Government Gazette, (Vol., No. 1867). Pretoria: Government Printers.
10. Department of Education, Republic of South Africa 1998. National Norms and Standards for School Funding, 12 October 1998. Government Gazette, (Vol. 400, No. 19347). Pretoria: Government Printers.
11. Department of Education, Republic of South Africa 2001. Brochure for the 2000 School Register of Needs Report. Retrieved from: www.education.gov.za/ content/documents/295.pdf.
12. Department of Education, Republic of South Africa (December) 2005. Grade 6 Intermediate Phase Systemic Evaluation Report. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/content/documents/ GR%206%20Intermediate%20Phase%20Systemic%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf.
13. Financial and Fiscal Commission (February) 2005. FFC comments on amendments to the Norms and Standards for School Funding. Retrieved from: http://www.ffc.co.za/docs/submissions/other/funding.pdf.
14. Fiske EB & Ladd HF 2002. Financing Schools in Post Apartheid South Africa: Initial Steps Toward Fiscal Equity. Working Papers Series SAN02-05.
15. Fiske EB & Ladd HF 2004. Elusive Equity. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
16. Grant Lewis S. & Motala S 2004. In Changing Class: Education and Social Change in Post-apartheid South Africa. L Chisholm (ed.). London and Cape Town: Zed and HSRC.
17. Greenwald R, Hedges L & Laine R 1996. The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-397.
18. Guthrie JW 2001. Constructing new finance models that balance equity, adequacy and efficiency with responsiveness. Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. Retrieved February 10, 2006 from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/ 28/19/2819.htm.
19. Hadderman M (August) 1999. Equity and adequacy in educational finance. ERIC Digest, 129. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from: http://eric.uoregon.edu/ publications/digests/digest129.html.
20. Human Sciences Research Council 2000. Third International Mathematics and Science Study Repeat (TIMSS-R). Retrieved from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/research/ timss/index.html.
21. Jansen JD July, 2005. Does money matter? Towards an explanation for the relationship between spending and performance in education in South Africa. Prepared for the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
22. King RA, Swanson AD & Sweetland SR 2005. Designing finance structures to satisfy equity and adequacy goals. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(15). Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n15/.
23. Ladd HF & Hansen JS (eds) 1999. Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.: Committee on Education Finance. Retrieved from http:/ /books.nap.edu/catalog/ 9606.html.
24. Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (June, 2003). Education: Federal Rights and Racial Equity, Adequacy, and Standards in K-12 Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http:// www.lawyerscomm.org.
25. McGrath S 1993. Equity and efficiency in educational finance: An operational conundrum. Retrieved September, 2005 from: http://www.mun.ca/educ/ faculty/mwatch/voll/mcgrath2.html.
26. McUsic M 1991. The use of education clauses in school finance reform litigation. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 307-340.
27. Minorini PA & Sugarman SD 1999. Educational adequacy and the courts: The promise and problems of moving to a new paradigm. In Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives. HF Ladd & JS Hansen (eds) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.: Committee on Education Finance. Retrieved from: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9606.html.
28. th Annual Conference of CIES, Palo Alto, California.
29. National Conference of State Legislatures 2002. Accountability, standards and assessments. Retrieved from: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/educ/ahomepage. htm.
30. Nicolau K 2001. The link between macroeconomic policies, education policies and the education budget. In Education and equity. E Motala & J pampallis (eds). Centre for Education Policy Development, Evaluation and Management, Johannesburg: Heinemann, 53-104.
31. Picus LO 2000. Adequate funding. Available online: http://www.asbj.com/ schoolspending/picus.html.
32. Reschovsky A 2006. Financing schools in the new South Africa. Comparative Education Review, 50(1). Retrieved from: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CER/ journal/issues/v50n1/5001202/ 500102.text.html.
33. Reschovsky A & Imazeki J (October) 2000. Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform. CPRE Research Report Series, RR-045. Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE), Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from: http://www.cpre.org.
34. Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc. 790 SW 2d 186, 210.
35. The Presidency, Republic of South Africa (January) 2006. Education Laws Amendment Act, 2005. Government Gazette No. 28426. Pretoria South Africa.
36. U.S. Department of Education (December 2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005005.pdf.
37. Versiegen DA 2004. (February 29). Calculation of the cost of an adequate education in Kentucky: A professional judgment approach. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(8). Retrieved [February 07, 2006] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n8/.
38. Versiegen DA & Whitney T 1997. From courthouses to schoolhouses : Emerging judicial theories of adequacy and equity. Educational Policy, 11(3), 29-36.
39. Wildeman R 2004. A progress report on the implementation of the Norms and Standards for School Funding 2000. Brief number 76. Retrieved from: http://www.idasa.org.za/bis.