Geometric morphometrics defines shape differences in the cortical area map of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Airey, David C ^a   Wu, Fangbai ^b   Guan, Monica ^b   Collins, Christine E ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MODIFICATION; FEMALE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HEREDITY; HISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NEOCORTEX; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; VISUAL CORTEX;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY CORTEX; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STAINING AND LABELING; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 33749173191     PISSN: 14712202     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-63     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. O'Leary D, Nakagawa Y: Patterning centers, regulatory genes and extrinsic mechanisms controlling arealization of the neocortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002, 12:14-25.
2. Grove E, Fukuchi-Shimogori T: Generating the cerebral cortical area map. Annu Rev Neurosci 2003, 26:355-380.
3. Rash B, Grove E: Area and layer patterning in the developing cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16:25-34.
4. Mallamaci A, Stoykova A: Gene networks controlling early cerebral cortex arealization. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 23(4):847-856.
5. Hamasaki T, Leingartner A, Ringstedt T, O'Leary D: EMX2 regulates sizes and positioning of the primary sensory and motor areas in neocortex by direct specification of cortical progenitors. Neuron 2004, 43(3):359-372.
6. Airey D, Robbins A, Enzinger K, Wu F, Collins C: Variation in the cortical area map of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice predicts strain identity. BMC Neurosci 2005, 6:18.
7. Dryden IL, Mardia KV: Statistical shape analysis Volume Wiley series in probability and statistics Probability and statistics Chichester; New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
8. Klingenberg C: Morphometrics and the role of the phenotype in studies of the evolution of developmental mechanisms. Gene 2002, 287(1-2):3-10.
9. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets DH, Fink WL: Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists Academic Press; 2004.
10. Gharaibeh W, Rohlf F, Slice D, DeLisi L: A geometric morphometric assessment of change in midline brain structural shape following a first episode of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 48(5):398-405.
11. Bookstein F, Sampson P, Streissguth A, Connor P: Geometric morphometrics of corpus callosum and subcortical structures in the fetal-alcohol-affected brain. Teratology 2001, 64:4-32.
12. Styner M, Gerig G, Lieberman J, Jones D, Weinberger D: Statistical shape analysis of neuroanatomical structures based on medial models. Med Image Anal 2003, 7(3):207-220.
13. Davatzikos C: Voxel-based morphometric analysis using shape transformations. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005, 66:125-146.
14. Li C, Wei X, Lu L, Peirce J, Williams R, Waters R: Genetic analysis of barrel field size in the first somatosensory area (SI) in inbred and recombinant inbred strains of mice. Somatosens Mot Res 2005, 22(3):141-150.
15. Riddle D, Purves D: Individual variation and lateral asymmetry of the rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 1995, 15(6):4184-4195.
16. Xu Y, Sari Y, Zhou F: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor disrupts organization of thalamocortical somatosensory barrels during development. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2004, 150(2):151-161.
17. Van der Loos H, Dorfl J, Welker E: Variation in pattern of mystacial vibrissae in mice. A quantitative study of ICR stock and several inbred strains. J Hered 1984, 75(5):326-336.
18. Airey D, Lu L, Shou S, Williams R: Genetic sources of individual differences in the cerebellum. Cerebellum 2002, 1(4):233-240.
19. Chesler E, Lu L, Shou S, Qu Y, Gu J, Wang J, Hsu H, Mountz J, Baldwin N, Langston M, Threadgill D, Manly K, Williams R: Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function. Nat Genet 2005, 37(3):233-242.
20. Rohlf F, Bookstein F: Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Syst Biol 2003, 52:66-69.
21. Airey D, Lu L, Williams R: Genetic control of the mouse cerebellum: identification of quantitative trait loci modulating size and architecture. J Neurosci 2001, 21(14):5099-5109.
22. Klingenberg C, Leamy L, Cheverud J: Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 2004, 166(4):1909-1921.
23. Flint J, Valdar W, Shifman S, Mott R: Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6(4):271-286.
24. Leygraf A, Hohoff C, Freitag C, Willis-Owen S, Krakowitzky P, Fritze J, Franke P, Bandelow B, Fimmers R, Flint J, Deckert J: Rgs 2 gene polymorphisms as modulators of anxiety in humans? J Neural Transm 2006.
25. Yalcin B, Willis-Owen S, Fullerton J, Meesaq A, Deacon R, Rawlins J, Copley R, Morris A, Flint J, Mott R: Genetic dissection of a behavioral quantitative trait locus shows that Rgs2 modulates anxiety in mice. Nat Genet 2004, 36(11):1197-1202.
26. Sansom S, Hebert J, Thammongkol U, Smith J, Nisbet G, Surani M, McConnell S, Livesey F: Genomic characterisation of a Fgf-regulated gradient-based neocortical protomap. Development 2005, 132(17):3947-3961.
27. Funatsu N, Inoue T, Nakamura S: Gene expression analysis of the late embryonic mouse cerebral cortex using DNA microarray: identification of several region- and layer-specific genes. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14(9):1031-1044.
28. Peirce J, Lu L, Gu J, Silver L, Williams R: A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice. BMC Genet 2004, 5:7.
29. WebQTL [http://www.genenetwork.org]
30. Wong-Riley M: Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Brain Res 1979, 171:11-28.
31. Image Processing and Analysis in Java [http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/]
32. SUNY Stoneybrook Morphometrics [http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/ index.html]
33. Kendall D: The diffusion of shape. Advances in Applied Probability 1977, 9:428-430.
34. Rohlf F, Slice D: Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 1990, 39:40-59.
35. Rohlf F: Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. J Hum Evol 2003, 44(6):665-683.
36. Goodall C: Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1991, 53(2):285-339.
37. Thompson DW: On growth and form Cambridge [Eng.]: University press; 1917.