Retinal microscotomas revealed with adaptive-optics microflashes

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 4160-4167

  Makous, Walter ^a   Carroll, Joseph ^a,d   Wolfing, Jessica I ^a,b   Lin, Julianna ^a   Christie, Nathan ^c   Williams, David R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE OPTICS MICROPERIMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEUTERANOPIA; HUMAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA CONE; RETINA DISEASE; RETINA IMAGE; SCOTOMA; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;

CONES (RETINA); FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINAL DISEASES; SCOTOMA;

EID: 33749129570     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1195     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
2. Johnson CA. Early losses of visual function in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:359-370.
3. Johnson CA. Selective vs. nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994;3:S32-S44.
4. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Pease ME. Foveal ganglion-cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:395-400.
5. Drum BA, Severns M, O'Leary DK, et al. Selective loss of pattern-discrimination in early glaucoma. Appl Opt. 1989;28:1135-1144.
6. Drum BA, Severns M, O'Leary DK, et al. Pattern discrimination and light detection test different types of glaucomatous damage. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/1989. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1989; v. 28.
7. Sample PA. Short-wavelength automated perimetry: its role in the clinic and for understanding ganglion cell function. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:369-383.
8. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;28:413-425.
9. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:863-871.
10. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry: central field retino-retinal correlates. Vision Res. 1995;35:293-301.
11. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion-cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300:5-25.
12. Neitz M, Carroll J, Renner A, Knau H, Werner JS, Neitz J. Variety of genotypes in males diagnosed as dichromatic on a conventional clinical anomaloscope. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21:205-216.
13. Carroll J, Neitz M, Hofer H, Neitz J, Williams DR. Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:8461-8466.
14. Crognale MA, Fry M, Highsmith J, et al. Characterization of a novel form of X-linked incomplete achromatopsia. Vis Neurosci. 2004;21:197-203.
15. Packer O, Diller LC, Verweij J, et al. Characterization and use of a digital light projector for vision research. Vision Res. 2001;41:427-439.
16. Harrington DO, Flocks M. Visual field examination by a new tachystoscopic multiple-pattern method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1954;37:719-723.
17. Henson DB. Visual Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
18. Frisen L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rare-bit probing. Vision Res. 2002;42:1931-1939.
19. Trick LM, Pylyshyn ZW. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently-a limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev. 1994;101:80-102.
20. Basak C, Verhaeghen P. Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: capacity differences and speed equivalence. Psychol Aging. 2003;18:240-249.
21. Jevons WS. The power of numerical discrimination. Nature. 1871;3:281-282.
22. Kaufman EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J. The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol. 1949;62:498-525.
23. Sharma V, Levi DM, Klein SA. Undercounting features and missing features: evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:496-501.
24. Putnam NM, Hofer HJ, Doble N, Chen L, Carroll J, Williams DR. The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. J Vis. 2005;5:632-639.
25. Artal P, Chen L, Fernandez EJ, Singer B, Manzanera S, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:281-287.
26. Hofer H, Chen L, Yoon GY, Singer B, Yamauchi Y, Williams DR. Improvement in retinal image quality with dynamic correction of the eye's aberrations. Opt Express. 2001;8:631-643.
27. Roorda A, Williams DR. The arrangement of the three cone classes in the human eye. Nature (Lond). 1999;397:520-522.
28. Hofer H, Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M, Williams DR. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9669-9679.
29. MacLeod DIA, Williams DR, Makous W. A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones. Vision Res. 1992;32:347-363.
30. Chen B, Makous W, Williams DR. Serial spatial filters in vision. Vision Res. 1993;33:413-427.
31. He S, MacLeod DIA. Contrast-modulation flicker: dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process. Vision Res. 1998;38:985-1000.
32. Qi X. Spatial Summation and Antagonism of Foveal Cone Signals at Different Illuminances on the Human Retina. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester; 1997. Dissertation.
33. Cicerone CM, Nerger JL. The density of cones in the fovea centralis of the human dichromat. Vision Res. 1989;29:1587-1595.
34. Cicerone CM, Nerger JL. The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis. Vision Res. 1989;29:115-128.
35. Nerger JL, Cicerone CM. The ratio of L-cones to M-cones in the human parafoveal retina. Vision Res. 1992;32:879-888.
36. Otake S, Cicerone CM. L and M cone relative numerosity and red-green opponency from fovea to midperiphery in the human retina. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000;17:615-627.
37. Geller AM, Sieving PA. Assessment of foveal cone photoreceptors in Stargardt's macular dystrophy using a small dot detection task. Vision Res. 1993;33:1509-1524.
38. Vimal RLP, Pokorny J, Smith VC, Shevell SK. Foveal cone thresholds. Vision Res. 1989;29:61-78.
39. Wesner MF, Pokorny J, Shevell SK, Smith VC. Foveal cone detection statistics in color-normals and dichromats. Vision Res. 1991;31:1021-1037.
40. Williams DR, MacLeod DIA, Hayhoe MM. Punctate sensitivity of the blue sensitive mechanism. Vision Res. 1981;21:1357-1376.
41. Marriott FHC. The foveal absolute threshold for short flashes and small fields. J Physiol (Lond). 1963;169:416-423.
42. Krauskopf J, Srebro R. Spectral sensitivity of color mechanisms: derivation from fluctuations of color appearance near threshold. Science. 1965;150:1477-1479.
43. Watson AB. Visual detection of spatial contrast patterns: evaluation of five simple models. Opt Express. 2000;6:12-33.
44. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ Jr. A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. J Vis. 2005;5:717-740.
45. Bex PJ, Makous W. Spatial frequency, phase and the contrast of natural images. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:1096-1106.
46. Quick RF. A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik. 1974;16:65-67.
47. Van Trees HL. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I: Detection, Estimation, and Linear Modulation Theory. New York: Wiley; 1968.
48. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company; 1974.
49. MacMillan NA. Signal detection theory. In: Wixted J, ed. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
50. Curcio CA, Sloan KR. Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy. Vis Neurosci. 1992;9:169-180.
51. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol. 1990;292:497-523.
52. Snodderly DM, Weinbaus RS, Choi JC. Neural-vascular relationships in central retina of macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Neurosci. 1992;12:1169-1193.
53. Conrath J, Giorgi R, Raccah D, Ridings B. Foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy: quantitative vs qualitative assessment. Eye. 2005;19:322-326.
54. Hendley CD. The relation between visual acuity and brightness discrimination. J Gen Physiol. 1948;31:433-457.
55. Graham CH, Bartlett NR. The relation of the size of stimulus and intensity in the human eye, III: the influence of area on foveal intensity discrimination. J Exp Psychol. 1940;27:149-159.
56. Willmer EN. The relationship between area and threshold in the central fovea for lights of different colours. Q J Exp Psychol. 1950;2:53-59.
57. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley; 1966.
58. Hofer H, Singer B, Williams DR. Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment. J Vis. 2005;5:444-454.