The external effects of place-based subsidized housing

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 679-707

  Schwartz, Amy Ellen ^a   Ellen, Ingrid Gould ^a   Voicu, Ioan ^a   Schill, Michael H ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Development revitalization; Externalities; Housing; Neighborhood

Indexed keywords

HEDONIC ANALYSIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; PROJECT DESIGN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING;

NEW YORK [NEW YORK (STT)]; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749128096     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Briggs X., Darden J.T., and Aidala A. In the wake of desegregation: early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 1 (1999) 27-49
2. Caplin A., and Leahy J. Miracle on Sixth Avenue: information externalities and search. The Economic Journal 108 (1998) 60-74 January
3. Cummings, J.L., DiPasquale, D., Kahn, M.E., 2000, Inner City Homeownership Opportunities and Black Community Choice (unpublished paper presented at the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Annual Meetings, 2001).
4. Downes T., and Zabel J. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2002) 1-25
5. Ellen I.G., Schill M.H., Susin S., and Schwartz A.E. Building homes, reviving neighborhoods: spillovers from subsidized construction of owner-occupied housing in New York City. Journal of Housing Research 12 2 (2002) 185-216
6. Farber S. Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies. Ecological Economics 24 1 (1998) 1-14
7. Galster G.C., Tatian P., and Smith R. The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate 10 4 (1999) 879-917
8. Glaeser E.L., and Sacerdote B. The social consequences of housing. Journal of Housing Economics 9 1-2 (2000) 1-23
9. Goetz, E., H.K. Lam, and A. Heitlinger,1996, There Goes the Neighborhood? The Impact of Subsidized Multi-Family Housing on Urban Neighborhoods, Minneapolis: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, Working Paper 96-1.
10. Hamilton J.T., and Viscusi K.W. How costly is "clean"? An analysis of the benefits and costs of superfund site remediations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 1 (1999) 2-27
11. Kiel K.A., and McClain K.T. The effect of an incinerator siting on housing appreciation rates. Journal of Urban Economics 37 3 (1995) 311-323
12. Kiel K.A., and Zabel J. Estimating the economic benefits of cleaning up superfund sites: the case of Woburn, Massachusetts. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22:2/3 (2001) 163-184
13. Koch, E.I., 1985, The State of the City: Housing Initiatives, (undated text of speech dated January 30, 1985).
14. Kohlhase J.E. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics 30 (1991) 1-26
15. Lee C., Culhane D.P., and Wachter S.M. The differential impacts of federally assisted housing programs on nearby property values: a Philadelphia case study. Housing Policy Debate 10 1 (1999) 75-93
16. Lyons, R.F. and S. Loveridge, 1993, An Hedonic Estimation of the Effect of Federally Subsidized Housing on Nearby Residential Property Values, Staff Paper P93-6, St. Paul, MN: Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
17. Michaels G.R., and Smith K.V. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics 28 2 (1990) 223-242
18. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. The 10 Year Plan (1989), New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, New York
19. Nourse H.O. The effects of public housing on property values in St., Louis. Land Economics 39 (1963) 433-441
20. E.O., Olsen. 2003. Housing Programs for Low-Income Households in Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the U.S., ed., Robert Moffitt, National Bureau of Economic Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
21. Park M.W. Mayor Bloomberg's housing plan: down payment for the future. New York City Independent Budget Office Fiscal Brief (2003)
22. Pollakowski H.O. The Effects of Rent Deregulation in New York City (1997), MIT Center for Real Estate, Cambridge, MA
23. Poterba J.M. Tax subsidies to owner-occupied housing: an asset market approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 4 (1984) 729-752
24. Rabiega W.A., Lin T., and Robinson L. The property value impacts of public housing projects in low and moderate density residential neighborhoods. Land Economics 60 (1984) 174-179
25. Santiago A.M., Galster G.C., and Tatian P. Assessing the property value impacts of the dispersed housing subsidy program in Denver. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 1 (2001) 65-88
26. Schill M.H., Ellen I.G., Schwartz A.E., and Voicu I. Revitalizing inner city neighborhoods: New York City's Ten Year Plan for housing. Housing Policy Debate 13 3 (2002) 529-566
27. Schwartz A.E., Susin S.J., and Voicu I. Has falling crime driven New York City's real estate boom?. Journal of Housing Research 14 1 (2003) 101-135
28. Smolen G.E., Moore G., and Conway L.V. Economic effects of hazardous waste landfills on surrounding real estate values in Toledo, Ohio. Research Report vol. 44 (1991), Center for Real Estate Education and Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
29. Wallin D., Schill M.H., and Daniels G. The State of New York City's Housing and Neighborhoods, 2002 (2002), Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University, New York