Concurrent engineering teams II: Performance consequences of usage

Team Performance Management: An International Journal

Volumn 12, Issue , 2006, Pages 125-137

  Todd, Boyle ^a   Vinod, Kumar ^b   Uma, Kumar ^b  

^a ST FRANCIS XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cross functional integration; Product development; Production engineering; Team working

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749076245     PISSN: 13527592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13527590610687893     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barclay, I. and Dann, Z. (2000), “New product development performance evaluation: a product-complextity-based method”, IEE Proc.-Sci. Meas. Technol., Vol. 147 No. 2, pp. 41-55.
2. Boyle, T.A., Kumar, V. and Kumar, U. (2005), “Concurrent engineering teams I: organizational determinants of usage”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 11 Nos 7 / 8, pp. 263-79.
3. Cooper, R., Edgett, S. and Kleinschmidt, E. (2004), “Benchmarking best NPD practices-III”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 43-56.
4. Ettlie, J.E. (1995), “Product-process development integration in manufacturing”, Management Science, Vol. 41 No. 7, pp. 1224-31.
5. Falk, R.F. and Miller, N.B. (1992), A Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.
6. Gerwin, D. and Barrowman, N. (2002), “An evaluation of research on concurrent engineering”, Management Science, Vol. 48 No. 7, pp. 938-53.
7. Griffin, A. (1997), “PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, pp. 429-58.
8. Griffin, A. and Page, A. (1993), “An interim report on measuring product development success and failure”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, pp. 291-308.
9. Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. (2001), “Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence”, Organization Science, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 435-49.
10. Moffat, L. (1998), “Tools and teams: competing models of concurrent engineering project performance”, Journal of Engineering Technology Management, Vol. 15, pp. 55-85.
11. Olson, E., Walker, O., Ruekert, R. and Bonner, J. (2001), “Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations, and R&D: implications for project performance”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 258-71.
12. PDMA (2006), available at: www.pdma.org/library/glossary.html (accessed May 2006).
13. Terwiesch, C. and Lock, C. (1999), “Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities”, Management Science, Vol. 45, pp. 455-65.
14. Trygg, L. (1993), “Concurrent engineering practices in selected Swedish companies: a movement or an activity of the few?”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 403-15.
15. Bochenek, G. and Ragusa, J. (2004), “Improving integrated project team interaction through virtual (3 D) collaboration”, Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, p. 3.
16. Gerwin, D. (2002), “Conceptualizing and implementing concurrent engineering”, working paper, Research Program in Managing Technological Change, Carleton University. Ottawa.