Effect of processing treatments on nutritional and antinutritional contents of green gram

Journal of Food Biochemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 535-546

  Grewal, Antu ^a   Jood, Sudesh ^a  

^a CCS HARYANA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIGNA RADIATA; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 33749032399     PISSN: 01458884     EISSN: 17454514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2006.00080.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, pp. 125-139, Association of Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
2. BISHNOI, S. 1992. Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods on nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum,). MSc Thesis, pp. 1-234, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
3. BISHNOI, S. and KHETARPAUL, N. 1994. Protein digestibility and field peas: Varietal differences and effect of domestic processing and cooking methods. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 46, 71-76.
4. CHANDRASEKHAR, C.P. and GHOSH, J. 2002. Food economy in disarray. Indian Food Ind. 21, 10-14.
5. DAVIES, N.T. and REID, H. 1979. An evaluation of phytate, zinc, copper, iron and manganese contents and zinc availability from soy based texture vegetable protein meat substitutes or meat entenders. Br. J. Nutr. 41, 576-589.
6. DUHAN, A., KHETARPAUL, N. and BISHNOI, S. 2002. Changes in phytates and HCl extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron of soaked, dulled, cooked and sprouted pigeonpea cultivar (UPAS-120). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 57, 275-284.
7. ESKIN, N.A.M. and WIEBE, S. 1983. Changes in phytase activity and phytate during germination of two faba bean cultivars. J. Food Sci. 48, 270-271.
8. HAZELL, T. and JOHNSON, I.T. 1987. In vitro estimation of iron availability from range of plant foods: Influence of phytate, ascorbate and citrate. Br. J. Nutr. 57, 223-233.
9. JOOD, S., CHAUHAN, B.M. and KAPOOR, A.C. 1987. Polyphenols of chickpea and blackgram as affected by domestic processing and cooking methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 39, 145-149.
10. JOOD, S., CHAUHAN, B.M. and KAPOOR, A.C. 1989. Protein digestibility (in vitro) of chickpea and blackgram seeds as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 39, 149-154.
11. JOOD, S., BISHNOI, S. and SHARMA, S. 1998a. Nutritional and physicochemical properties of chickpea and lentil cultivars. Die Nah./Fd. 42, 70-73.
12. JOOD, S., BISHNOI, S. and SEHGAL, S. 1998b. Effect of processing on nutritional and anti-nutritional factors of moongbean cultivars. J. Food Biochem. 22, 245-257.
13. KATARIA, A., CHAUHAN, B.M. and PUNIA, D. 1989. Antinutrients and protein digestibility (in vitro) of mungbean as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Food Chem. 32, 9-17.
14. KHOKHAR, S. 1984. Studies on nutrient composition and antinutritional factors of moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia). MSc Thesis, pp. 1-210, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
15. KIM, H. and ZEMEL, M.R. 1986. In vitro estimation of the potential bioavailability of calcium from sea mustard, milk and spinach under stimulated, normal and reduced gastric acid condition. J. Food Sci. 51, 957-963.
16. LINDSEY, W.L. and NORWELL, M.A. 1969. A new DPTA-TEA soil test for zinc and iron. Agron. Abstr. 61, 84.
17. MERTZ, E.I., KIRLEIZ, A.W. and AXTELL, J.D. 1983. In vitro digestibility of proteins in major food cereals. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 42, 6026-6029.
18. NEGI, A. 1999. Nutritional evaluation of some high yielding varieties of mothbean (Phaseolus aconitifolius Jacq.): Effect of domestic processing and cooking methods. MSc Thesis, pp. 1-289, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
19. PANSE, Y.G. and SUKHATME, P.V. 1978. Statistical Methods of Agricultural Workers, 2nd Ed., pp. 12-87, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
20. PREET, K. and PUNIA, D. 2000. Antinutrients and digestibility (in vitro) of soaked, dehulled and germinated cowpea. Nutr. Health 14, 109-117.
21. RAO, B.S.N. and PRABHAVATHI, T. 1982. Tannin content of food commonly consumed in India and its influence on ionisable iron. J. Sci. Food Agric. 33, 89-96.
22. ROY, D.N. and RAO, P.S. 1971. Evidence, isolation and some properties of trypsin inhibitor in Lathirus sativus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 19, 257-262.
23. SAHARAN, K. 1994. Studies on the development of products from ricebean and fababean: Their sensory and nutritional evaluation. PhD Thesis, pp. 1-275, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
24. SAHARAN, K., KHETARPAUL, N. and BISHNOI, S. 2002. Antinutrients and protein digestibility of fababean and ricebean as affected by soaking, dehulling and germination. J. Food Sci. Technol. 39, 418-422.
25. SINGH, U. and JAMBUNATHAN, R. 1981. Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars: The level of protease inhibitors, levels of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro digestibility. J. Food Sci. 46, 1364-1367.
26. SINHA, R. 1999. Nutritional evaluation processing and utilization of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). PhD Thesis, pp. 1-282, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
27. SINHA, R., KAWATRA, A. and SEGHAL, S. 2002. Digestibility of carbohydrate of cowpea as affected by processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 39, 246-250.
28. SOOD, M., MALHOTRA, S.R. and SOOD, B.C. 2002. Effect of processing and cooking on proximate composition of chickpea varieties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 39, 69-71.
29. SWAIN, J. and HILLS, W.E. 1959. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica the qualitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 10, 63.
30. WALKER, A.F. and KOCHHAR, N. 1982. Effect of processing including domestic cooking on nutritional quality of legumes. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 41, 41-51.