|
Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 777-779
|
Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens
a b c d e f g h i j,k j,l m n m o b p h h,q r more.. |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DOUBLE STRANDED RNA;
RNA;
SHORT HAIRPIN RNA;
SMALL INTERFERING RNA;
ACCURACY;
ARTICLE;
CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;
FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS;
GENE EXPRESSION;
GENE SILENCING;
GENETIC DATABASE;
GENETIC SCREENING;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
MAMMAL CELL;
METHODOLOGY;
NONHUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RISK REDUCTION;
RNA ANALYSIS;
RNA INTERFERENCE;
RNA SEQUENCE;
STANDARD;
TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;
DATABASES, GENETIC;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
GENETIC SCREENING;
PHENOTYPE;
RISK;
RNA INTERFERENCE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 33749023011
PISSN: 15487091
EISSN: 15491676
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1006-777 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (387)
|
References (7)
|