Metadata-driven design of integrated environments for software performance validation

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-146

  D'Ambrogio, Andrea ^a   Iazeolla, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Lifecycle validation; Metamodeling; Software environments; Software performance

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; METADATA; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; XML;

LIFECYCLE VALIDATION; METAMODELING; SOFTWARE ENVIRONMENTS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 11144271040     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bernardi, S., Donatelli, S., Meseguer, J., 2002. From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petri nets. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP2002), Rome, Italy, July 24-26
2. Bezivin, J., 2001. From object composition to model transformation with the MDA. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Technology of Object-Oriented Language Systems (TOOLS39), Santa Barbara, CA, USA, August 2001
3. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I. Unified Modeling Language User Guide. 1997;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
4. Cortellessa, V., Mirandola, R., 2000. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP2000), pp. 58-70, Ottawa, Canada, September 2000
5. Cortellessa V., D'Ambrogio A., Iazeolla G. Automatic derivation of software performance models from CASE documents. Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;81-106
6. D'Ambrogio, A., 2003. SOON: a tool for software performance validation, Report RI.01.03, Laboratory for Computer Science, University of Roma TorVergata, Roma, Italy, January 2003
7. Gordon, R.F., Loewner, P.G., MacNair, E.A., 1992. The Research Queueing Package, Version 3, Language Reference Manual, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, March 1992
8. Gotta, D., Cico, G., 1993. Performance evaluation in a open system environment, in: Proceedings Convention Unix, Milano, Italy
9. Gu, G.P., Petriu, D.C., 2002. XSLT transformation from UML models to LQN performance models, in: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP2002), Rome, Italy, July 24-26
10. Herzog, U., 1996. A concept for graph-based process algebras, generally distributed activity times and hierarchical modelling. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Process Algebra and Performance Modelling, 1996, July, Torino, Italy
11. Hrischuk, C., Rolia, J., Woodside, C.M., 1995. Automatic generation of a software performance model using an object-oriented prototype. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS'95), pp. 399-409
12. Hrischuk C.E., Woodside C.M., Rolia J.A. Trace-based load characterization for generating performance software models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 25(1):1999;122-135
13. Iazeolla G., D'Ambrogio A., Mirandola R. Software performance validation strategies. Gelenbe E. System Performance Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications. 2000;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
14. King, P., Pooley, R., 1999. Derivation of petri net performance models from UML specifications of communication software. In: Proceedings of the XV UK Performance Engineering Workshop
15. Lavenberg S.S. Computer Performance Modeling Handbook. 1983;Academic Press, New York
16. Morrison M., Morrison J., Keys A. Integrating web sites and databases. Communications of the ACM. 45(9):2002;81-86
17. Object Management Group, 2001. Unified Modeling Language (UML) Specification, version 1.4, September 2001
18. Object Management Group, 2002. XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification, version 1.2, January 2002
19. Object Management Group, 2002. UML Profile for Scheduling, Performance and Time, March 2002
20. Object Management Group, 2002. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4, April 2002
21. Petriu D.C., Shen H. Applying the UML performance profile: graph grammar based derivation of LQN models from UML specifications. Fields T. Computer Performance Evaluation - Modelling Techniques and Tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2324:2002;159-177 Springer Verlag, Berlin
22. Petriu, D., Woodside, M., 2002. Software Performance Models from System Scenarios in Use Case Maps, Proceedings of Performance TOOLS 2002, London, UK, April 2002
23. Pooley, R., 1999. Using UML to derive stochastic process algebra models. In: Proceedings of the XV UK Performance Engineering Workshop
24. Rolia J.A., Sevcik K.C. The Method of Layers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 21(8):1995;689-700
25. Smith C.U. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. 1992;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
26. Smith C.U., Williams L.G. Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. 2002;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
27. Vinoski S. Web services interaction models - Part 1: current practice. Internet Computing. 6(3):2002;89-91
28. Vinoski S. Putting the "Web" into web services: web services interaction models - Part 2. Internet Computing. 6(4):2002;90-92
29. Woodside C.M., Majumdar S., Neilson J.E., Petriu D.C., Rolia J.A., Hubbard A., Franks R.B. A Guide to Performance Modelling of Distributed Client-Server Software Systems with Layered Queueing Networks. 1995;Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
30. Woodside M., Hrischuk C., Selic B., Bayarov S. Automated performance modeling of software generated by a design environment. Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;107-123
31. WWW Consortium, 1998. Document Object Model (DOM) Level 1 Specification Version 1, W3C Recommendation. Available from October 1998
32. WWW Consortium, 1999. eXtensible Stylesheet Language: Transformations (XSLT), W3C Recommendation. Available from November 1999
33. WWW Consortium, 2000. eXtensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation. Available from October 2000
34. WWW Consortium, 2001. XML Schema, W3C Recommendation, Available from May 2001