Steps towards the automatic production of performance models of web applications

Computer Networks

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-39

  D'Ambrogio, Andrea ^a   Iazeolla, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Model production; Performance prediction; Web configuration; Web performance

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PACKET NETWORKS; PERFORMANCE; QUEUEING NETWORKS;

PERFORMANCE PREDICTION;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 0037437673     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1286(02)00324-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bolch G., Greiner S., de Meer H., Trivedi K.S. Queueing Networks and Markov Chains. 1998;Wiley, New York.
2. Lavenberg S.S. Computer Performance Modeling Handbook. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
3. Smith C.U. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. 1992;Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Smith C.U., Williams L.G. Performance engineering evaluation of object-oriented systems with SPEED. Marie R.et al. Computer Performance Evaluation Modelling Techniques and Tools, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1245. 1997;Springer, Berlin.
5. Sauer C.H., MacNair E.A. Simulation of Computer Communications Systems. 1983;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. R. Fielding, U.C. Irvine, J. Gettys, J.C. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach, T. Berners-Lee, Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.1, Internet Request for Comments RFC 2616, June 1999.
7. Cortellessa V., D'Ambrogio A., Iazeolla G. Automatic derivation of software performance models from case documents. Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;81-105.
8. Iazeolla G. Special Issue on Performance Validation of Software Systems. - Guest Editorial Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;77-79.
9. Korner U., Fdida S., Perros H., Shapiro G. End-to-end delays in a catenet environment. Performance Evaluation Review. 15:1988;20-27.
10. Rolia J.A., Sevcik K.C. The method of layers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 21(8):1995;689-700.
11. Herzog U., Rolia J.A. Performance validation tools for software/hardware systems. Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;125-146.
12. Woodside M., Hrischuk C., Selic B., Bayarov S. Automated performance modeling of software generated by a design environment. Performance Evaluation. 45(2-3):2001;107-123.
13. V. Cortellessa, R. Mirandola, Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP2000), Ottawa, Canada, September 2000, pp. 58-70.
14. D. Gotta, G. Cico, Performance evaluation in a open system environment, in: Proceedings Convention Unix, Milano, Italy, 1993.
15. C. Hrischuk, J. Rolia, C.M. Woodside, Automatic generation of a software performance model using an object-oriented prototype, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS'95), 1995, pp. 399-409.
16. Iazeolla G., D'Ambrogio A., Mirandola R. Software performance validation strategies, Performance'99 Conference. 1999;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
17. M. Woodside, C. Hrischuk, B. Selic, S. Bayarov, A wideband approach to integrating performance prediction into a software design environment, in: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP98), October 1998, pp. 31-41.
18. R.F. Gordon, P.G. Loewner, E.A. MacNair, The research queueing package, version 3, Language Reference Manual, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, March 1992.