Friends and foes in foraging: Intraspecific interactions act on foraging-cycle stages

Behaviour

Volumn 143, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 733-745

  Nilsson, P Anders ^a   Turesson, Håkan ^a   Brönmark, Christer ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Eurasian perch; Facilitation; Interference; Northern pike; Pikeperch; Predation

Indexed keywords

ESOX LUCIUS;

EID: 33748959342     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853906777791379     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams, P.A. & Ginzburg, L.R. (2000). The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 337-341.
2. Beddington, J.R. (1975). Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. - J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 331-340.
3. Bruno, J.F., Stachowitcz, J.J. & Bertness, M.D. (2003). Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 119-125.
4. Cowx, I.G. (1997). Introduction of fish species into European freshwaters: economic success or ecological disasters? - Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 344-345: 51-11.
5. Craig, J. (2000). Percid fishes: systematics, ecology and exploitation. - Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
6. Cresswell, W. (1997). Interference competition at low competitor densities in blackbirds Turdus merula. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 461-471.
7. Eklöv, P. (1992). Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. - Anim. Behav. 44: 313-326.
8. Elshoud-Oldenhave, M.J.W. (1979). Prey capture in the pike-perch, Stizostedion lucioperca (Teleostei, Percidae): a structural and functional analysis. - Zoomorphologie 93: 1-32.
9. Endler, J.A. (1991). Interactions between predators and prey. - In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach (Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B., eds). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
10. Fryxell, J.M. & Lundberg, P. (1998). Individual behavior and community dynamics. - Chapman & Hall, London.
11. Giraldeau, L.-A. & Caraco, T. (2000). Social foraging theory. - Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
12. Godin, J.-G.J. (1997). Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. - Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Grimm, M.P. & Klinge, M. (1996). Pike and some aspects of its dependence on vegetation. - In: Pike: biology and exploitation (Craig, J.F., ed.). Chapman & Hall, London, p. 125-156.
14. Hansson, L.-A., Annadotter, H., Bergman, E., Hamrin, S.F., Jeppesen, E., Kairesalo, T., Luokkanen, E., Nilsson, P.-Å., Søndergaard, M. & Strand, J. (1998). Biomanipulation as an application of food-chain theory: constraints, synthesis, and recommendations for temperate lakes. - Ecosystems 1: 558-574.
15. Hassell, M.P. & Varley, G.C. (1969). New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. - Nature 223: 1133-1137.
16. Hawkins, L.A., Armstrong, J.D. & Magurran, A.E. (2005). Aggregation in juvenile pike (Esox lucius): interactions between habitat and density in early winter. - Funct. Ecol. 19:794-799.
17. Holling, C.S. (1966). The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. - Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 48: 1-86.
18. Krause, J. & Ruxton, G.D. (2002). Living in groups. - Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Loose, C.J., von Elert, E. & Dawidowicz, P. (1993). Chemically-induced diel vertical migration in Daphnia: a new bioassay for kairomones exuded by fish. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 126:329-337.
20. Major, P.F. (1978). Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Caranx ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus. - Anim. Behav. 26: 760-777.
21. Nilsson, P.A. (2001). Predator behaviour and prey density: evaluating density-dependent intraspecific interactions on predator functional responses. - J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 14-19.
22. Nilsson, P.A. (2006). Avoid your neighbours: size-determined spatial distribution patterns among northern pike individuals. - Oikos 113: 251-258.
23. Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. (1999). Foraging among cannibals and kleptoparasites: effects of prey size on pike behavior. - Behav. Ecol. 10: 557-566.
24. Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. (2000a). Prey vulnerability to a gape-size limited predator: behavioural and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. - Oikos 88: 539-546.
25. Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. (2000b). The role of gastric evacuation rate in handling time of equal-mass rations of different prey sizes in northern pike. - J. Fish. Biol. 57: 516-524.
26. Nilsson, P.A., Huntingford, F.A. & Armstrong, J.D. (2004). Using the functional response to determine the nature of unequal interference among foragers. - Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 271: S334-S337.
27. van der Meer, J. & Ens, B.J. (1997). Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 846-858.
28. Persson, L. & Greenberg, L.A. (1990). Optimal foraging and habitat shift in perch (Perca fluviatilis) in a resource gradient. - Ecology 71(5): 1699-1713.
29. Pettersson, L.B., Nilsson, P.A. & Brönmark, C. (2000). Predator recognition and defence strategies in crucian carp. - Oikos 88: 200-212.
30. Rafacz, M. & Templeton, J.J. (2003). Environmental unpredictability and the value of social information for foraging starlings. - Ethology 109: 951-960.
31. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. - McGraw-Hill, New York.
32. Skov, C., Berg, S., Jacobsen, L. & Jepsen, N. (2002). Habitat use and foraging success of 0+ pike (Esox lucius L.) in experimental ponds related to prey fish, water transparency and light intensity. - Ecol. Freshw. Fish 11: 65-73.
33. Søndergaard, M., Jeppesen, E. & Berg, S. (1997). Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool 2. Effects on lower trophic levels in Lake Lyng, Denmark. - Hydrobiologia 342/343: 319-325.
34. Stillman, R.A., Goss-Custard, J.D. & Alexander, M.J. (2000). Predator search pattern and the strength of interference through prey depression. - Behav. Ecol. 11: 597-605.
35. Turesson, H., Persson, A. & Brönmark, C. (2002). Prey selection in piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) includes active prey choice. - Ecol. Freshw. Fish 11: 223-233.
36. Vahl, W.K., van der Meer, J., Weissing, F.J., van Dullemen, D. & Piersma, T. (2005). The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders. - Behav. Ecol. 16:845-855.
37. Webb, P.W. (1986). Locomotion and predator-prey relationships. - In: Predator-prey relationships (Feder, M.E. & Lauder, G.V., eds). The University of Chicago Press, London, p. 24-41.
38. Webb, P.W. & Skadsen, J.M. (1980). Strike tactics of Esox. - Can. J. Zool. 58: 1462-1469.