Using the functional response to determine the nature of unequal interference among foragers

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 271, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2004, Pages

  Nilsson, P Anders ^a,c   Huntingford, Felicity A ^a   Armstrong, John D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Aggression; Atlantic salmon; Filtering; Functional response; Interference; Intimidation

Indexed keywords

FOOD INTAKE; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; SALMONID;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATLANTIC SALMON; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD INTAKE; JUVENILE; NONHUMAN; PREY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; SALMO SALAR; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 3242877092     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0170     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alanärä, A., Burns, M. D. & Metcalfe, N. B. 2001 Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: the temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 980-986.
2. Beddington, J. R. 1975 Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 44, 331-340.
3. Elliott, J. M. 2002 Shadow competition in wild juvenile sea-trout. J. Fish. Biol. 61, 1268-1281.
4. Ens, B. J. & Goss-Custard, J. D. 1986 Piping as a display of dominance by wintering oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus. Ibis 128, 382-391.
5. Fryxell, J. M. & Lundberg, P. 1998 Individual behavior and community dynamics. London: Chapman & Hall.
6. Giraldeau, L.-A. & Caraco, T. 2000 Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press.
7. Grant, J. W. A. 1997 Territoriality. In Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes (ed. J.-G. J. Godin), pp. 81-103. Oxford University Press.
8. Griffiths, S. W. & Armstrong, J. D. 2002 Kin-biased territory overlap and food sharing among Atlantic salmon juveniles. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 480-486.
9. Hogstad, O. 1986 It is expensive to be dominant. Auk 104, 333-336.
10. Höjesjö, J. 2002 Behavioural tactics and domestication effects in salmonids. PhD thesis, Department of Zoology, Gothenburg University, Sweden.
11. Holling, C. S. 1959 Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385-398.
12. Jakobsson, S., Brick, O. & Kullberg, C. 1995 Escalated fighting behaviour incurs increased predation risk. Anim. Behav. 49, 235-239.
13. Moody, A. L. & Ruxton, G. D. 1996 The intensity of interference varies with food density: support for behaviour-based models of interference. Oecologia 108, 446-449.
14. Pedersen, B. K. & Hoffman-Goetz, L. 2000 Exercise and the immune system: regulation, integration, and adaptation. Physiol. Rev. 80, 1055-1081.
15. Reinhardt, U. G. 1999 Predation risk breaks size-dependent dominance in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and provides growth opportunities for risk-prone individuals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1206-1212.
16. Ruxton, G. D. 1999 The differing effects of interference on individuals of different rank. Ecol. Lett. 2, 4-5.
17. Sirot, E. 2000 An evolutionary stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups. Behav. Ecol. 11, 351-356.
18. Sloman, K. A. & Armstrong, J. D. 2002 Physiological effects of dominance hierarchies: laboratory artefacts or natural phenomena? J. Fish Biol. 61, 1-23.
19. Sloman, K. A., Taylor, A. C., Metcalfe, N. B. & Gilmour, K. M. 2001 Effects of an environmental perturbation on the social behaviour and physiological function of brown trout. Anim. Behav. 61, 325-333.
20. Valdimarsson, S. K., Metcalfe, N. B., Thorpe, J. E. & Huntingford, F. A. 1997 Seasonal changes in sheltering: effect of light and temperature on diel activity in juvenile salmon. Anim. Behav. 54, 1405-1412.
21. Wilson, D. S. 1974 Prey capture and competition in the ant lion. Biotropica 6, 187-193.