Variability in initial spray deposit in apple trees in space and time

Pest Management Science

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 947-956

  Xu, Xiangming ^a   Wu, Pihong ^a   Thorbek, Pernille ^b   Hyder, Kieran ^b  

^a EAST MALLING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Initial deposition; Orchard; Scale; Spatiotemporal variation

Indexed keywords

CHELATING AGENT; EDETIC ACID; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; ZINC;

EXPERIMENTAL MINERALOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; ORCHARD; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPRAY; TRACER;

APPLE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FRUIT; PLANT LEAF; TIME;

CHELATING AGENTS; EDETIC ACID; FRUIT; MALUS; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; PLANT LEAVES; TIME FACTORS; ZINC;

LONCHOCARPUS CAPASSA; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 33748945424     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1262     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Food consumption and exposure assessment of chemicals. World Health Organization in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, WHO/FSF/FOS/97.5, pp. 1-70 (1997).
2. Report from the commission to the council on the application of Article 7 of Council Directive 86/362/EEC and Article 4 of Council Directive 90/642/EEC, concerning the monitoring of pesticide residues. Commission of the European Communities, pp. 1-7 (2000).
3. Harris CA and Davis TJ, Unit to unit variation of pesticide residues in celery, plums and kiwi fruit. Pesticide Safety Directorate (UK), pp. 1-62 (1998).
4. Harris CA, How the variability issue was uncovered: the history of the UK residue variability findings. Food Addit Contam 17:491-495 (2000).
5. Ambrus Á, Within and between field variability of residue data and sampling implications. Food Addit Contam 17:519-537 (2000).
6. Hill ARC, Residue variability and sampling - practical problems and consequences for residues monitoring. Food Addit Contam 17:539-546 (2000).
7. Hill ARC and Reynolds SL, Unit-to-unit variability of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables. Food Addit Contam 19:733-747 (2002).
8. Cross J, Walklate P, Murray R and Richardson G, Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 1. Effects of spray liquid flow rate. Crop Prot 20:13-30 (2001).
9. Bruhn JA and Fry WE, A mathematical model of the spatial and temporal dynamics of chlorothalonil residues on potato foliage. Phytopathology 72:1306-1312 (1982).
10. Hamilton D, Ambrus Á, Dieterle R, Felsot A, Harris C, Petersen B, et al, Pesticide residues in food - acute dietary exposure. Pest Manag Sci 60:311-339 (2004).
11. Cross J, Walklate P, Murray R and Richardson G, Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 2. Effects of spray quality. Crop Prot 20:333-343 (2001).
12. Travis JW, Effects of travel speed, application volume, and nozzle arrangement on deposition and distribution of pesticides in apple trees. Plant Dis 71:606-612 (1987).
13. Travis JW, Effects of canopy density on pesticide deposition and distribution in apple trees. Plant Dis 71:613-615 (1987).
14. Hall FR, Downer RA, Cooper JA, Ebert TA and Ferree D, Changes in spray retention by apple leaves during a growing season. Hort Sci 32:858-860 (1997).
15. Smith FD and MacHardy WE, The retention and redistribution of captan on apple foliage. Phytopathology 74:884-899 (1984).
16. Holland PT, Malcolm CP, Mowat AD, Rohitha BH and Gaskin RE, Modelling of pesticide residues on fruit II: Persimmon. Proc 49th New Zealand Plant Protection Conf, pp. 192-197 (1996).
17. Weins JA, Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385-397 (1989).
18. Levin SA, The problem of pattern and scales in ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967 (1992).
19. Tilman D and Kareiva P (eds) Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997).
20. Underwood AJ and Chapman MG, Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107:212-224 (1996).
21. Hyder K, Johnson MP, Hawkins SJ and Gurney WSC, Barnacle demography: evidence for an existing model and spatial scales of variation. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 174:88-99 (1998).
22. Travis JW, Skroch WA and Sutton TB, A technique for determining the deposition of heavy metals in pesticides. Phytopathology 75:783-785 (1985).
23. Murray RA, Cross JV and Ridout MS, The measurement of multiple spray deposits by sequential application of metal chelate tracers. Ann Appl Biol 137:245-252 (2000).
24. Cross JV, Murray RA, Walklate PJ and Richardson GM, Pesticide dose adjustment to the crop environment (PACE): efficacy evaluations in UK apple orchards 2002-2003. Asp Appl Biol 71:287-294 (2004).
25. Walklate PJ, Cross JV, Richardson GM, Baker DE and Murray RA, A generic method of pesticide dose expression: application to broadcast spraying of apple trees. Ann Appl Biol 143:11-23 (2003).
26. Patterson HD and Thompson R, Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545-554 (1971).
27. Payne R (ed.) The Guide to GenStat® Release 6.1 - Part 2: Statistics. VSN International, Oxford (2002).
28. Robinson D, Thompson R and Digby P, REML - a program for the analysis of non-orthogonal data by restricted maximum likelihood, Compstat 1982 Proceedings in Computational Statistics, Part II (supplement). Physica-Verlag, Vienna, pp. 231-232 (1982).
29. Gilmour A, Thompson R, Cullis B and Welham S, ASREML. Biometric Bulletin. NSW Agriculture (1996).
30. Hamilton DJ, Holland PT, Ohlin B, Murray WJ, Ambrus Á, Baptista GCD, et al, Optimum use of available residue data in the estimation of dietary intake of pesticides. Pure Appl Chem 69:1373-1410 (1997).
31. Ambrus Á, Estimation of uncertainty of sampling for analysis of pesticide residues. J Environ Sci Health Part B - Pesticides, Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes B31:435-442 (1996).
32. Hamilton DJ, Making best use of available residue data for acute intake assessment. Food Add Contam 17:563-568 (2000).
33. Ambrus Á, Quality of residue data, in Pesticide Chemistry and Bioscience: the Food-Environment Challenge, ed. by Brooks GT and Roberts TR. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp. 339-350 (1999).
34. Ambrus Á, Measurement of uncertainty in pesticide residue analysis: implications in legal limits. Ital J Food Sci 12:259-278 (2000).
35. Hamey PY, A practical application of probabilistic modelling in assessment of dietary exposure of fruit consumers to pesticide residues. Food Addit Contam 17:601-610 (2000).
36. Bruhn JA and Fry WE, A statistical model of fungicide deposition on potato foliage. Phytopathology 72:1301-1305 (1982).
37. Ambrus Á and Soboleva E, Contribution of sampling to the variability of pesticide residue data. JAOAC Internat 87:1368-1379 (2004).
38. Helsel DR, Less than obvious: statistical treatment of data below the detection limit. Environ Sci Technol 24:1766-1774 (1990).
39. Aguilera-del Real A, Valverde-Garcia A and Camacho-Ferre F, Behavior of methamidophos residues in peppers, cucumbers, and cherry tomatoes grown in a greenhouse: evaluation by decline curves. J Agric Food Chem 47:3355-3358 (1999).
40. Brenneman TB, Summer HR and Harrison GW, Deposition and retention of chlorothalonil applied to peanut foliage: effects of application methods, fungicide formulations and oil additives. Peanut Sci 17:80-84 (1990).
41. Ade G, Pezzi F, Cooper SE and Taylor WA, The influence of some application variables on spray deposition in field-grown tomatoes. Asp Appl Biol 57:225-233 (2000).
42. Whitney JD, Salyani M, Churchill BD, Knapp JL, Whiteside JO and Littell RC, A field investigation to examine the effects of sprayer type ground speed and volume rate on spray deposition in Florida USA Citrus. J Ag Engng Res 42:275-284 (1989).